Skip to main content
Court Order

Order 1

CNR MHCC01003363201820 Mar 2018
City Civil Court, Mumbai
Mumbai · Maharashtra (MH)
Back to Case

Full Order Text

Order 1 · 20 Mar 2018 · CNR MHCC010033632018

Order Details: Notice of Motion
Pdf Text: BA EXH.3 IN S.C.278/2017 1
IN THE COURT OF SESSIONS JUDGE FOR GREATER BOMBAY AT
BOMBAY
BAIL APPLICATION EXH.3
IN
S.C. NO. 278 OF 2017
Ajazali Imamali Chaudhary ... Applicant
V/s
State of Maharashtra
(Wadala T.T.Police station) .. Respondent.
MR. Arjun Lingalod avocate for Applicant .
Ms.Ashwini Raykar APP for State/Respondent.
Coram : Her Honour Judge
(Smt.) Pushpa N. Rao
CR no. : 32
Dated : 30th June,2017
ORDER
Applicant/accused is charge sheeted for the offence
punishable u/s. 399, 402 of I.P.C. r/w.4,25 of Indian Arms Act.r/w.
37(1)(a),135 of Bombay Police Act registered in C.R.No.628/16.
2. Perused application and say filed by prosecution.
3. Heard Ld.advocate Shri.Arjun Lingalod for the
applicant/accused and Ld.APP Ms.Raykar for the State/Respondent.
-- 1 of 3 --
BA EXH.3 IN S.C.278/2017 2
4. The Ld.advocate for the applicant submitted that applicant
is innocent and falsely implicated in the case. He was returning to his
home after his labour work but the police has implicated him falsely.
Applicant has no concerned with the alleged seized goods. Entire family
of the applicant is dependent on him as he is in jail. His family is facing
the starvation, hence, prays that applicant be released on bail.
5. I have perused the FIR. Nylon rope and one black colour
mobile was seized from the possession of applicant/accused. There was
no explanation for what purpose he was carrying out the nylon rope
with him. Therefore, the submission of Ld.advocate for the applicant is
not found to be correct. On the other hand, Ld.APP submitted that if the
applicant released on bail again he will commit the same nature of
offence. Therefore, he should not be released on bail.
6. As such, there is no grounds made out by the applicant to
release him on bail. Hence, I proceed to pass following order.
ORDER
Bail application vide Exh.3 stands rejected.
Dated : 30/6/2017 (Pushpa N. Rao)
Judge
City Civil Court
Greater Mumbai
Dictation Direct typed on computer: 30/6/2017
Transcribed by steno. On : 30/6/2017
Signed by HHJ on : 30/6/2017
-- 2 of 3 --
BA EXH.3 IN S.C.278/2017 3
CERTIFIED TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF THE ORIGINAL SIG
JUDGMENT/ORDER”.
UPLOAD DATE AND TIME NAME OF STENOGRAPHER
03/7/2017at ( 5.48p.m.) Mrs. J.V.Pawar
Name of the Judge (With Court room No.) HHJ Smt. Pushpa N. Rao
(Court Room no.32)
Date of Pronouncement of JUDGMENT/ORDER 30/6/2017
JUDGMENT/ORDER signed by P.O.on 30/6/2017
JUDGMENT/ ORDER uploaded on 03/7/2017
-- 3 of 3 --

TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.