Full Order Text
Order 1 · 03 Mar 2020 · CNR MHCC010033602018
Order Details: Notice of Motion Pdf Text: NM No.1024/2018 ..1.. Suit No.2459/2017 CNR No. MHCC01-003360-2018 IN THE CITY CIVIL COURT FOR GREATER MUMBAI NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 1024 OF 2018 IN SUIT NO.2459 OF 2017 Mishrilal Bhurilalji Jain. .. Plaintiff Versus Lalmiya Nawab Khan and one. .. Defendants. Advocates Bal R. Patil for the plaintiff. Samir Bhandari for defendants. CORAM : HIS HONOUR JUDGE Sunil T. Soor. (COURT No.: 2) DATED : 3rd March, 2020 ORAL ORDER Present notice of motion is taken out on behalf of the plaintiff for mesne profit, appointment of court receiver to take physical possession of suit premises and injunction against defendants from creating third party right in suit premises in terms of prayer clause 1 to 3. 2. Advocate for defendants filed written statement at Exh.3 and filed pursis (Exh.4) to treat their written statement as reply to this notice of motion. 3. Perused notice of motion, affidavit in support of it, written statement of defendants and proceedings of the case. Heard advocate for both parties. -- 1 of 3 -- NM No.1024/2018 ..2.. Suit No.2459/2017 4. Advocate for defendants fairly submitted that defendants will not create third party interest in suit premises till decision of the suit but he strongly opposed prayer of the plaintiff for mesne profit and appointment of Court receiver on the ground that these prayers are not tenable at this stage. 5. Perused the plaint. Plaintiff is claiming mesne profit and damages from defendants as well as possession of suit premises. Defendants are in possession of suit premises i.e., shop no. 208-1/2 situated at Nari Seva Sadan Road, Narayan Nagar, Ghatkopar West, Mumbai. As suit is pending, relief of mesne profit and appointment of court receiver to take physical possession of suit premises cannot be granted at this interim stage. 6. Though plaintiff taken out this notice of motion for mesne profit, appointment of court receiver to take physical possession of suit premises and injunction against defendants from creating third party right in suit premises but in affidavit in support of notice of motion, plaintiff claimed only injunction against defendants from creating third party interest in suit premises. Under the facts, circumstances and fair submission of advocate for defendants, prayer clause 3 in the notice of motion can be made absolute. In the result, following order. ORDER 1. Notice of Motion No.1024 of 2018 is partly allowed and made absolute in terms of prayer clause 3 only. 2. Accordingly, notice of motion is disposed of. (Sunil T. Soor) Judge Date : 03.03.2020 Gr. Mumbai. Typed on : 03.03.2020 HHJ signed on : 03.03.2020 -- 2 of 3 -- NM No.1024/2018 ..3.. Suit No.2459/2017 “CERTIFIED TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF THE ORIGINAL SIGNED JUDGMENT/ORDER.” 03.03.2020, 5.30 p.m. UPLOAD DATE AND TIME Mrs. V. N. Rajgole. NAME OF STENOGRAPHER Name of the Judge (With Court Room No.) H.H.J. Shri. S. T. Soor C.R.No.02 Date of Pronouncement of JUDGMENT/ORDER 03.03.2020 JUDGMENT/ORDER signed by P.O. on 03.03.2020 JUDGMENT/ORDER uploaded on 03.03.2020 -- 3 of 3 --
