SUIT - SHORT CAUSE CIVIL SUIT
Mohammed Parvez A.S. PatelVsThe Assistant Commissioner
CNR MHCC0100333120196-COURT 06 ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE
City Civil Court, Mumbai
Mumbai · Maharashtra (MH)
CASE DISPOSED
Uncontested--DISMISSED
Decision Date: 26th March 2019
TrustJury record updated 19 Sept 2026
Case Overview
- Registration Number
- 100816/2019
- Registration Date
- 24 Mar 2019
Advocates
1For Petitioner
For Respondent
Not available
Parties
2Petitioner
Respondent
Acts & Sections
1Hindu Marriage Act · Sec 34 · 37
Case History / Proceedings
Case History
Date: 26-03-2019
Business: Advocate Mr. Atul Singh for plaintiff present with plaintiff.
Advocate Mr. Giri for deft./MMC present with officer Shri Sushil Nangare (Rent Supervisor) and Ms. Shalini Lad (Rent Collector).
Heard both the sides.
Advocate for plaintiff submitted that advocate for defendant issued notice u/s 314 of MMC Act dated 22.03.2019. Plaintiff could not get time to give reply to the notice. Plaintiff has documents to show the authorization of the structure. Hence, in this circumstances plaintiff is directed to file reply to the notice within four days from today and thereafter, defendant corporation shall pass speaking order. Till then and in case of adverse order one week thereafter corporation is directed not to take any coercive action. In view of this suit and draft NM are disposed of. Proceeding is closed.
Judge
Nature Of Disposal: DISMISSED
Disposal Date: 26-03-2019Additional Case Details
Additional Case Details
Filing Number: 103607/2019 Filing Date: 24-03-2019 First Hearing Date: 26th March 2019 Decision Date: 26th March 2019 Court Number And Judge: 6-COURT 06 ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE
Orders
1Final Order 126 Mar 2019
26 Mar 2019
Order Details: Other Pdf Text: IN THE COURT OF :COURT 6 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE Case No. :SUIT/0100816/2019 Mohammed Parvez A.S. Patel Vs The Assistant Commissioner Date : 26-03-2019 Business : Advocate Mr. Atul Singh for plaintiff present with plaintiff. Advocate Mr. Giri for deft./MMC present with officer Shri Sushil Nangare (Rent Supervisor) and Ms. Shalini Lad (Rent Collector). Heard both the sides. Advocate for plaintiff submitted that advocate for defendant issued notice u/s 314 of MMC Act dated 22.03.2019. Plaintiff could not get time to give reply to the notice. Plaintiff has documents to show the authorization of the structure. Hence, in this circumstances plaintiff is directed to file reply to the notice within four days from today and thereafter, defendant corporation shall pass speaking order. Till then and in case of adverse order one week thereafter corporation is directed not to take any coercive action. In view of this suit and draft NM are disposed of. Proceeding is closed. Judge Nature of Disposal : DISMISSED Disposal Date : 26-03-2019 COURT 6 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE -- 1 of 1 --
TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.
