TRANSFER APPL
ABNCO VIE WIN ENT Private Limited - Dindoshi Suit No. 599/2015 and 2945/2015VsJaya Anand Sawant
CNR MHCC01003330201819-COURT 19 PRINCIPAL JUDGE CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS COURT
City Civil Court, Mumbai
Mumbai · Maharashtra (MH)
CASE DISPOSED
Uncontested--ALLOWED
Decision Date: 16th March 2018
TrustJury record updated 10 Sept 2026
Case Overview
- Registration Number
- 100067/2018
- Registration Date
- 08 Mar 2018
Advocates
1For Petitioner
For Respondent
Not available
Parties
2Acts & Sections
1Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Land (Vidarbha Region and Kutch Area) Act · Sec 9
Case History / Proceedings
Case History
Date: 09-03-2018 Business: Fresh matter. Adv. Sayyad Ahmed for applicant present. None for respondent. Adjd for service on 16.03.18. Next Purpose: SERVICE Next Hearing Date: 16-03-2018 Date: 16-03-2018 Business: Adv. Sayyed Rehmat for applicant present. He files affidavit of service. Adv. Sandesh Godes for respondent present. Heard both sides. It is submitted that the subject matter of both the suits and parties in both the suits are the same. Ld. Counsel for respondent has no objection for the proposed transfer. In this circumstances, it is desirable that both the suits shall be tried by the one Court to avoid conflicting decisions. Hence I pass the following order. O R D E R Suit No.2945/2015 be withdrawn from C.R.No.3 of Dindoshi Court and made over to C.R.No.2 of Dindoshi Court where suit No.599/2015 is pending. Nature Of Disposal: ALLOWED Disposal Date: 16-03-2018
Additional Case Details
Additional Case Details
Filing Number: 103742/2018 Filing Date: 08-03-2018 First Hearing Date: 09th March 2018 Decision Date: 16th March 2018 Court Number And Judge: 19-COURT 19 PRINCIPAL JUDGE CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS COURT
Orders
2Final Order 116 Mar 2018
16 Mar 2018
Order Details: Other Pdf Text: 16/03/2018 CORAM : HER HONOUR THE PRINCIPAL JUDGE MRS. P.V. GANEDIWALA T.A. 67/18 Adv. Sayyed Rehmat for applicant present. He files affidavit of service. Adv. Sandesh Godes for respondent present. Heard both sides. It is submitted that the subject matter of both the suits and parties in both the suits are the same. Ld. Counsel for respondent has no objection for the proposed transfer. In this circumstances, it is desirable that both the suits shall be tried by the one Court to avoid conflicting decisions. Hence I pass the following order. O R D E R Suit No.2945/2015 be withdrawn from C.R.No.3 of Dindoshi Court and made over to C.R.No.2 of Dindoshi Court where suit No.599/2015 is pending. Principal Judge, Gr. Mumbai. -- 1 of 1 --
Order 116 Mar 2018
16 Mar 2018
Order Details: Other Pdf Text: 16/03/2018 CORAM : HER HONOUR THE PRINCIPAL JUDGE MRS. P.V. GANEDIWALA T.A. 67/18 Adv. Sayyed Rehmat for applicant present. He files affidavit of service. Adv. Sandesh Godes for respondent present. Heard both sides. It is submitted that the subject matter of both the suits and parties in both the suits are the same. Ld. Counsel for respondent has no objection for the proposed transfer. In this circumstances, it is desirable that both the suits shall be tried by the one Court to avoid conflicting decisions. Hence I pass the following order. O R D E R Suit No.2945/2015 be withdrawn from C.R.No.3 of Dindoshi Court and made over to C.R.No.2 of Dindoshi Court where suit No.599/2015 is pending. Principal Judge, Gr. Mumbai. -- 1 of 1 --
TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.
