Skip to main content
NOTICE OF MOTION

Mr. Jagmohan alias Jaggan Bhaggan GuptaVsB.R.Construction Builder and Developer +2 more

CNR MHCC01003279201813-COURT 13 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE
City Civil Court, Mumbai
Mumbai · Maharashtra (MH)
CASE DISPOSED
Uncontested--DISMISSED
Decision Date: 31st January 2020

TrustJury record updated 10 Sept 2026

Case Overview

Registration Number
101003/2018
Registration Date
08 Mar 2018

Advocates

1

For Petitioner

    Not available

    For Respondent

    Parties

    4

    Petitioner

    1. 1Mr. Jagmohan alias Jaggan Bhaggan Gupta

    Respondent

    1. 1B.R.Construction Builder and Developer
    2. 2Brahmadeo Rampher Sharma
    3. 3Raj Chaturvedi

    Acts & Sections

    1
    Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act · Sec 9

    Case History / Proceedings

    Case History
    Date: 02-05-2018
Business: None present.
Adjd to 19/09/2018 for N.M. hearing.
Next Purpose: N/M FOR SET ASIDE
Next Hearing Date: 19-09-2018

Date: 19-09-2018
Business: Court is vacant.
Next Purpose: N/M FOR SET ASIDE
Next Hearing Date: 10-10-2018

Date: 10-10-2018
Business: Court is vacant.
Next Purpose: N/M FOR SET ASIDE
Next Hearing Date: 15-01-2019

Date: 15-01-2019
Business: Adv. Rajneesh Upadhyay for defendant No. 2 present. And tendered NM No. 1003/18 tor.
Adjd for reply to 28/03/2019.
Next Purpose: REPLY
Next Hearing Date: 28-03-2019

Date: 28-03-2019
Business: None present.
Matter is adjd for on 26.06.2019.
Next Purpose: REPLY
Next Hearing Date: 26-06-2019

Date: 26-06-2019
Business: Adv. Yogesh K. Tripathi I/b Lavkush Sharma for defendant present.
Defendant is not taking steps to serve the notice of NM to the plaintiff.
Hence keep for dismissal order of NM  to 31/08/2019.
Next Purpose: DISMISSAL
Next Hearing Date: 31-08-2019

Date: 31-08-2019
Business: Nobody present .
Adjd for dismissal to 21/11/2019.
Next Purpose: DISMISSAL
Next Hearing Date: 21-11-2019

Date: 21-11-2019
Business: Nobody present.
Adjd for dismissal to 31/01/2020
Next Purpose: DISMISSAL
Next Hearing Date: 31-01-2020

Date: 31-01-2020
Business: Both the parties absent.
Advocate for plaintiff and defendant are absent.
The Notice of Motion is filed by defendant in the year 2018. The deft is not appearing for taking steps to proceed with the Notice of Motion. It seems that defendant is not interested.
                ORDER passed in NM No. 1003/18
The defendant absent. Not taking steps to proceed. Till date not served the plaintiff. There is no record to show that he served the coy of notice of motion to plaintiff. Hence notice of motion is dismissed for not taking steps.
Nature Of Disposal: DISMISSED
Disposal Date: 31-01-2020

    Additional Case Details

    Additional Case Details
    Filing Number: 103695/2018
Filing Date: 08-03-2018
First Hearing Date: 02nd May 2018
Decision Date: 31st January 2020
Court Number And Judge: 13-COURT 13 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE

    Orders

    2
    Final Order 1
    31 Jan 2020
    Order Details: Notice of Motion
Pdf Text: -- 1 of 3 --
-- 2 of 3 --
Dt.31/01/2020
NM 1003/18 in
SUM 593/15
IN THE COURT OF H.H.J. SMT. S. S. NAGUR JUDGE CITY
CIVIL COURT C.R. NO. 13
Both the parties absent.
Advocate for plaintiff and defendant are absent.
The Notice of Motion is filed by defendant in the year 2018.
The deft is not appearing for taking steps to proceed with the
Notice of Motion. It seems that defendant is not interested.
ORDER passed in NM No. 1003/18
The defendant absent. Not taking steps to proceed. Till date not
served the plaintiff. There is no record to show that he served
the coy of notice of motion to plaintiff. Hence notice of motion
is dismissed for not taking steps.
Judge.
-- 3 of 3 --
    Order 1
    31 Jan 2020
    Order Details: Notice of Motion
Pdf Text: -- 1 of 3 --
-- 2 of 3 --
Dt.31/01/2020
NM 1003/18 in
SUM 593/15
IN THE COURT OF H.H.J. SMT. S. S. NAGUR JUDGE CITY
CIVIL COURT C.R. NO. 13
Both the parties absent.
Advocate for plaintiff and defendant are absent.
The Notice of Motion is filed by defendant in the year 2018.
The deft is not appearing for taking steps to proceed with the
Notice of Motion. It seems that defendant is not interested.
ORDER passed in NM No. 1003/18
The defendant absent. Not taking steps to proceed. Till date not
served the plaintiff. There is no record to show that he served
the coy of notice of motion to plaintiff. Hence notice of motion
is dismissed for not taking steps.
Judge.
-- 3 of 3 --

    TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.