Full Order Text
Order 1 · 29 Jul 2019 · CNR MHCC010032712018
Order Details: Notice of Motion Pdf Text: N/m No. 4274/18 in Suit No. 1842/18. 1 Order. IN THE BOMBAY CITY CIVIL COURT AT BOMBAY. NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 4274 OF 2018 (CNR NO. MHCC010142142018) IN SUIT NO. 1842 OF 2018 (CNR NO. MHCC010032712018) Rajendra K. Goradia ...Plaintiff Versus M/s. Baby Shop and Others ...Defendants CORAM : HIS HONOUR JUDGE SHRI G.G.BHANSALI. (C.R.NO.31). DATE : 29th JULY, 2019. Ms. Poonam Sharma, Advocate for Plaintiff. None for Defendants. ORAL ORDER This is a motion taken out by plaintiff under Order 38 Rule 5 of CPC for attachment of the properties i.e. a) All movable goods lying in a shop premises i.e. M/s. Baby Shop, Opposite Railway Station, Kottayam. b) Flat No.9B, PPD, Kurvankunam Junction, Trivendrum. c) Open Plot 3817/3 at Village Kavadiyar. 2. Ld. Advocate Poonam Sharma for plaintiff argued at length that in view of the roznama dated 05/03/2018 suit is proceeded ex parte against defendant no.1 and 2. It is requested to peruse letter of agent namely Bharat Mehta and postal endorsement on two envelopes endorsed by the postman. As mentioned in the letter by Bharat Mehta, -- 1 of 3 -- N/m No. 4274/18 in Suit No. 1842/18. 2 Order. defendants 1 to 3 are indebted due to various loan in market and they may abscond at any time. It is claimed for attachment of aforesaid properties. 3. It is to note that there is no supportive affidavit of agent Bharat Mehta. It is to note that the document in respect of title about aforesaid plot is a photocopy. There is no document in respect of the flat no.9B is owned and possessed by defendants no.2 and 3. On perusal of endorsement of postal department on summons sent by RPAD, it bears memo i.e. addressee left. It is not clarified by plaintiff that whether the Baby Shop is still in possession of defendants 1 to 3. 4. Plaintiff has exclusively relied on a letter addressed by agent Mr. Bharat Mehta. There is no sufficient ground shown by the plaintiff to satisfy that the property may be sold or removed by the defendants. In short, motion deserves to be rejected. Hence the order : ORDER 1. Notice of Motion No. 4274/2018 stands rejected. 2. N/m No. 4274/18 is disposed off accordingly. (G.G.BHANSALI) Judge, City Civil & Sessions Court, Date : 29/07/2019. Mumbai. 1. Dictated on : 29/07/2019. 2. Transcribed on : 30/07/2019. 3. Signed on : 31/07/2019. 4. Delivered to Certified : Copy Section on -- 2 of 3 -- N/m No. 4274/18 in Suit No. 1842/18. 3 Order. “CERTIFIED TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF THE ORIGINAL SIGNED JUDGMENT/ORDER” UPLOAD DATE AND TIME NAME OF STENOGRAPHER 01/08/2019. 11.07 a.m. Miss M.A.Kulkarni Name of the Judge (with Court Room no.) HHJ Shri G.G.Bhansali. (Court Room No.31). Date of Pronouncement of Judgment/Order 29/07/2019. Judgment/Order signed by P.O. on 31/07/2019. Judgment/Order uploaded on 01/08/2019. -- 3 of 3 --
