Full Order Text
Final Order 1 · 04 Jul 2019 · CNR MHCC010032472019
Order Details: Notice of Motion Pdf Text: NM No. 1261/2019 in Suit No.7367/1997 IN THE BOMBAY CITY CIVIL COURT AT BOMBAY NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 1261 OF 2019 IN SUIT NO. 7367 OF 1997 (CNR NO. –) Mr. Ambalal Gulabchand Jain ) Residing at ) Shop No. 21, Abhinandan Market, ) Kalbadevi Raod, Mumbai 400 002 ) …. Plaintiff Versus 1. Mr. Ghisu Parekh ) Since deceased through his legal heir ) Mr. Bhadraj Ghisu Parekh ) Residing at ) Amantran Jewellers, Shop No. 3 ) Shivram Palace, Near Shankar Temple, ) Angre Chowk, Alibaug (Raigarh) ) 2. Mr. Balkrishna Rama Thakur ) Residing at ) Parekh Jewellers, Balaji Naka, ) in front of Kalambika Devi, ) Alibaug (Raigarh) ) ….Defendants Appearance: Adv. Sankalan Das for applicant present. ...1/ -- 1 of 6 -- NM No. in Suit No. 2 CORUM : SMT. S.S. NAGUR, AD HOC JUDGE & ASST. SESSIONS JUDGE, (C.R.NO.13) DATE : 04/07/2019 ORAL ORDER 1) The notice of motion is filed by the applicant who are the legal heirs of defendant No. 1 to set aside the exparte decree. The Notice of Motion is supported by Affidavit of Bhadraj Ghisu Parekh. He on oath stated that the plaintiff was well aware of death of defendant No. 1 and has attended funeral of defendant No. 1 then too did not take steps to bring the legal heirs of defendant No. 1. The execution proceeding was filed by the plaintiff and it was served to the applicant in the Month of August 2018. Hence prayed to set aside the decree . 2) The report of affidavit of service shows that the notice of motion is served to the plaintiff. The plaintiff failed to appear. Hence the notice of motion is proceeded exparte against plaintiff. 3) Heard Adv. Sankalan Das for applicant. Perused contents of notice of motion supported by affidavit. I have also gone through the proceeding of summary suit No. 7367/1997. 4) The suit is filed by the plaintiff for recovery of Rs. 1,70,585.17/ and Rs. 1,15,000/ the amount of interest. The applicants have filed on record the death certificate of defendant No. 1. It shows that the defendant No. 1 expired ...2/ -- 2 of 6 -- NM No. in Suit No. 3 on 02/04/2009. The suit proceeded further. On perusal of the record the unconditional leave was granted to the defendant by Hon'ble High Court by order dt. 21/06/1999 in summons for judgment No. 709/1997 in summary suit No. 2790/1997. In the order it is observed by Hon'ble High Court that the defendants have denied their signature on the bill. On perusal of the record the Adv. for defendant has withdrawn the vakalatnama after issuing the notice to the defendant No. 1. It shows that it is unclaimed by the defendant and returned to the sender. The vakalatnama was withdrawn in the year 2003. 5. The defendant even after grant of unconditional leave did not file the written statement therefore after the suit was transferred from Hon'ble High court due to increase in pecuniary jurisdiction the Adv. for plaintiff appeared in the court but nobody appeared for defendant No. 1 as the vakalatnama was withdrawn. The defendant No. 1/applicants didn't have the notice of transfer of the suit in this Court. The roznama shows that only plaintiff appeared in the court and proceeded with the suit. The applicants were not aware of the proceeding. The defendant No. 1 expired in the year 2009. The exparte decree is passed on 06/01/2014. the evidence of the applicant on oath states that they came to know about the decree in the month of August 2018 when they received the notice of Execution ...3/ -- 3 of 6 -- NM No. in Suit No. 4 filed by the plaintiff for recovery. 6. Advocate for applicant has relied on authority reported in Gurnam Singh(D) Thr Lrs. V/s. Gurbachan kaur (D) [2017] 13 SCC 414 , [2017] 5 SCC (Civil Appeal) 658. In this case the death of both the parties was delaying hearing of second appeal. The Hon'ble High Court held that the law on the point is well settled. On the death of a party to the appeal, if no application is made by the party concerned to the appeal or by legal representatives of the deceased on whom the right to sue has devolved for substitution of their names in place of the deceased party within 90 days from the date of death of the party, such appeal abates automatically on expiry of 90 days from the date of the death of the party. 7. The facts on record shows that the defendant No. 1 expired in the year 2009. Though notice was issued to him by his Advocate on record. He did not claim the said notice. The defendant No. 1 was not aware of the proceeding transferred to this court. Hence I hold that the applicants who are the legal heirs of defendant should be given an opportunity to contest the suit as unconditional leave on the basis of denial of the signature of Bill of Exchange was granted. The defendant No. 1 failed to appear in the suit therefore the exparte decree was passed. Though the opportunity was given and the deceased defendant No. 1 ...4/ -- 4 of 6 -- NM No. in Suit No. 5 was informed by his Advocate but he failed to appear nor an attempt is made by him to follow up the suit before Hon'ble High Court. Therefore the decree can be set aside only of condition of deposit of amount of Rs. 2,00,000/ in the court. Hence pass following order : ORDER 1. The Notice of Motion is allowed 2. The applicants are hereby directed to deposit the amount of Rs. 2,00,000/ (Two lakh only) within one month of the order to be kept in Fixed deposit of nationalised bank. 3. On deposit of the amount within the above period the decree dt. 04/01/2014 in summary suit No. 7367/1997 is set aside and the file is restored. 4. Accordingly notice of motion is disposed of. (S.S. Nagur) Date : 04/07/2019 AdHoc Judge & Asst. Sessions Judge, City Civil Court, Greater Mumbai. Dictated on : 04/07/2019 Transcribed on : 04/07/2019 Signed on : 04/07/2019 ...5/ -- 5 of 6 -- NM No. in Suit No. 6 “CERTIFIED TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT, COPY OF THE ORIGINAL SIGNED JUDGMENT/ORDER” DATE & TIME OF UPLOADING : NAME OF TYPIST 15/07/2019 : 12.02 pm Mr. M. M. Patange Name of the Judge (with Court no.) : HHJ Smt. S.S. Nagur (CR no. 13) Date of pronouncement of Judgment/ : 04/07/2019 Order Judgment/Order signed by the P.O. on : 04/07/2019 Judgment/Order uploaded on : 15/07/2019 ...6/ -- 6 of 6 --
