Skip to main content
NOTICE OF MOTION

Varsha Jayprakash MandangadkarVsUttara Umesh Khanolkar and ors.

CNR MHCC0100320020202-COURT 02 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE
City Civil Court, Mumbai
Mumbai · Maharashtra (MH)
CASE DISPOSED
Contested--ALLOWED
Decision Date: 09th March 2021

TrustJury record updated 28 Sept 2026

Case Overview

Registration Number
101119/2020
Registration Date
13 Mar 2020

Advocates

2

For Petitioner

For Respondent

Parties

2

Petitioner

  1. 1Varsha Jayprakash Mandangadkar

Respondent

  1. 1Uttara Umesh Khanolkar and ors.

Acts & Sections

1
Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act · Sec 9

Case History / Proceedings

Case History
Date: 27-03-2020
Business: adjourned
Next Purpose: REPLY
Next Hearing Date: 08-04-2020

Date: 27-03-2020
Business: adjourned
Next Purpose: REPLY
Next Hearing Date: 08-04-2020

Date: 27-03-2020
Business: adjourned
Next Purpose: REPLY
Next Hearing Date: 08-04-2020

Date: 08-04-2020
Reason For Adjournment: National Lock Down
Next Purpose: REPLY
Next Hearing Date: 20-04-2020

Date: 08-04-2020
Reason For Adjournment: National Lock Down
Next Purpose: REPLY
Next Hearing Date: 20-04-2020

Date: 08-04-2020
Reason For Adjournment: National Lock Down
Next Purpose: REPLY
Next Hearing Date: 20-04-2020

Date: 20-04-2020
Reason For Adjournment: National Lock Down
Next Purpose: REPLY
Next Hearing Date: 30-05-2020

Date: 20-04-2020
Reason For Adjournment: National Lock Down
Next Purpose: REPLY
Next Hearing Date: 30-05-2020

Date: 20-04-2020
Reason For Adjournment: National Lock Down
Next Purpose: REPLY
Next Hearing Date: 30-05-2020

Date: 30-05-2020
Business: National Lockdown
Next Purpose: REPLY
Next Hearing Date: 17-06-2020

Date: 30-05-2020
Business: National Lockdown
Next Purpose: REPLY
Next Hearing Date: 17-06-2020

Date: 30-05-2020
Business: National Lockdown
Next Purpose: REPLY
Next Hearing Date: 17-06-2020

Date: 17-06-2020
Next Purpose: REPLY
Next Hearing Date: 02-09-2020

Date: 02-09-2020
Reason For Adjournment: Adjourned due to Covid-19
Next Purpose: REPLY
Next Hearing Date: 16-10-2020

Date: 16-10-2020
Reason For Adjournment: Adjourned due to Covid-19
Next Purpose: REPLY
Next Hearing Date: 10-12-2020

Date: 10-12-2020
Business: Adv Jitesh Goel for deft no. 4 present.
Matter stands Adj for reply to 09/02/2021.
Next Purpose: REPLY
Next Hearing Date: 09-02-2021

Date: 09-02-2021
Business: Adv S. D. Shinde for plff present.
Adv Rajapurkar for deft no. 4 present.
Adv Devdatta Dalvi for deft no. 5 present.
He requested date to file NM reply.  Granted as last chance.
Matter stands Adj for NM Reply to 09/03/2021.
Next Purpose: REPLY
Next Hearing Date: 09-03-2021

Date: 09-03-2021
Business: Adv. S. D.  Shinde for plaintiff present.
Adv. Jitesh Goyal for defendant no.4 present.
Adv. Devdatta Dalavi for defendant no.5 present.
Defendant no.5 registered NM 1119/2020.
Adv. for plaintiff filed reply on NM 1119/2020 itself.
Heard both parties. NM is for condonation of 25 days delay in filing WS of defendant no.5 on the record.
Advocate for plaintiff formally opposed the NM and prayed for cost. It appears that Defendant no.5 is the society. Advocate for defendant no.5 submitted that meetings was not conducted of defendant no.5 society. Considering the reasons mentioned in the NM and small period of delay, NM No. 1119/2020 is allowed and disposed of. No order  as to costs.
Defendant no.5 filed written statement. t.o.r. and marked as Exh. 09.
Nature Of Disposal: ALLOWED
Disposal Date: 09-03-2021

Additional Case Details

Additional Case Details
Filing Number: 102648/2020
Filing Date: 13-03-2020
First Hearing Date: 13th March 2020
Decision Date: 09th March 2021
Court Number And Judge: 2-COURT 02 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE

Orders

1
Final Order 1
09 Mar 2021
Order Details: Other
Pdf Text: 09.03.2021 CORAM : HIS HONOUR JUDGE SHRI. S. T. SOOR
(C. R. No. 2)
SU 1952/2019
@NM
2724/2019
@NM
1119/2020
Exh.09
Adv. S. D. Shinde for plaintiff present.
Adv. Jitesh Goyal for defendant no.4 present.
Adv. Devdatta Dalavi for defendant no.5 present.
Defendant no.5 registered NM 1119/2020.
Adv. for plaintiff filed reply on NM 1119/2020 itself.
Heard both parties. NM is for condonation of 25 days delay
in filing WS of defendant no.5 on the record.
Advocate for plaintiff formally opposed the NM and prayed
for cost. It appears that Defendant no.5 is the society.
Advocate for defendant no.5 submitted that meetings was
not conducted of defendant no.5 society. Considering the
reasons mentioned in the NM and small period of delay, NM
No. 1119/2020 is allowed and disposed of. No order as to
costs.
Defendant no.5 filed written statement. t.o.r. and marked as
Exh. 09.
Matter stands Adj to 03/04/2021 for hearing on NM.
Judge
-- 1 of 1 --

TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.