SUIT - SHORT CAUSE CIVIL SUIT
Mohammed Amman Masalawala +1 moreVsMCGM +1 more
CNR MHCC0100318120196-COURT 06 ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE
City Civil Court, Mumbai
Mumbai · Maharashtra (MH)
CASE DISPOSED
Uncontested--OTHER
Decision Date: 20th March 2019
TrustJury record updated 19 Sept 2026
Case Overview
- Registration Number
- 100767/2019
- Registration Date
- 19 Mar 2019
Advocates
1For Petitioner
For Respondent
Not available
Parties
4Respondent
Acts & Sections
1Hindu Marriage Act · Sec 34 · 36
Case History / Proceedings
Case History
Date: 20-03-2019 Business: By precipe. Advocate Mr. A. R. Pande for plaintiff present with plaintiff and filed draft NM. Advocate Mr. Sutar for deft./MMC present with officer Shri Subodh Bamburde (JE, E/ward). Heard both the sides. Defendant MCGM has given notice u/s 351 of MMC Act. Plaintiff has given reply to the notice. However, due to the short of time the speaking order is yet not passed. Hence, defendant MCGM is directed to consider the reply and documents filed by plaintiff and then pass speaking order. Till then and in case of the adverse order if any two weeks thereafter defendant corporation is directed not to take any coercive action in respect of the suit premises. Accordingly, suit and draft NM are disposed of. Draft NM be registered for statistical purpose. Proceeding is closed. Nature Of Disposal: OTHER Disposal Date: 20-03-2019
Additional Case Details
Additional Case Details
Filing Number: 103455/2019 Filing Date: 19-03-2019 First Hearing Date: 20th March 2019 Decision Date: 20th March 2019 Court Number And Judge: 6-COURT 06 ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE
Orders
1Final Order 120 Mar 2019
20 Mar 2019
Order Details: Other Pdf Text: IN THE COURT OF :COURT 6 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE Case No. :SUIT/0100767/2019 Mohammed Amman Masalawala Vs MCGM Date : 20-03-2019 Business : By precipe. Advocate Mr. A. R. Pande for plaintiff present with plaintiff and filed draft NM. Advocate Mr. Sutar for deft./MMC present with officer Shri Subodh Bamburde (JE, E/ward). Heard both the sides. Defendant MCGM has given notice u/s 351 of MMC Act. Plaintiff has given reply to the notice. However, due to the short of time the speaking order is yet not passed. Hence, defendant MCGM is directed to consider the reply and documents filed by plaintiff and then pass speaking order. Till then and in case of the adverse order if any two weeks thereafter defendant corporation is directed not to take any coercive action in respect of the suit premises. Accordingly, suit and draft NM are disposed of. Draft NM be registered for statistical purpose. Proceeding is closed. Nature of Disposal : OTHER Disposal Date : 20-03-2019 COURT 6 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE -- 1 of 1 --
TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.
