Full Order Text
Final Order 1 · 18 Jan 2022 · CNR MHCC010031782020
Order Details: Ex-parte Judgement Pdf Text: Filed on :13.03.2020 Registered On :18.12.2020 Decided on :18.01.2022 Duration : Y-01/M-10/D-07 IN THE BOMBAY CITY CIVIL COURT AT BOMBAY SUMMARY SUIT NO. 563 OF 2020 IN Exhibit-08 CNR No. MHCC01-003178-2020 Premchand Gulabchandji Age: of Mumbai, an adult Indian Inhabitant, Carrying on business of Money Lending at and from 46, Modi Street, Ground Floor, Fort, Mumbai- 400 001. ... Plaintiff V/s. 1. Jagan Jayram Patil age not known, of Mumbai an adult Indian Inhabitant working for gain DRM office Mumbai Central, 3rd Floor, Electrical Department, Mumbai- 400 080, and residing at, Room No. 3331, Kharde Kosbir Taluka , Vasai Post Dahisar. 2. Deepak Suresh Sosa age not known, of Mumbai an adult Indian Inhabitant working gain DRM office Mumbai Central, 3rd Floor, Electrical Department, Mumbai- 400 080, and residing 1 ... Defendants -- 1 of 7 -- Summ. Suit No.563/2020 2 at, Room No. 8/23,Dahisar RLY Quarters, Manav Kalyan Opp. Navnit Hospital, Mumbai- 400 068. SUIT FOR RECOVERY OF MONEY Appearance:- Mr. Ramesh Jain Advocate for the plaintiff. Exparte against Defendant. CORAM : HER HONOUR AD-HOC JUDGE SMT. A.H. KASHIKAR CITY CIVIL COURT, GR. BOMBAY (C.R. NO.61). DATE : 18/01/2022 JUDGMENT (Dictated and pronounced in Open Court.) 1. This is a summary suit under order XXXVII of Code of Civil Procedure 1908 instituted by the plaintiff against the defendants. 2. The facts of the suit claim of the plaintiff are summarized in nutshell as under :- Plaintiff is doing business of money lending. The defendants approached to him for loan. Hence, on 22.4.2017, the defendants executed a Demand Promissory Note in favour of the plaintiff for valuable consideration being a sum of Rs.60,000/- received by the defendants from the plaintiff against and on the basis of execution and handing over of the said Demand Promissory Note. By the said demand promissory Note the defendant promised to pay to the plaintiff said sum of Rs.60,000 /- alongwith interest thereon @1.25% per month. on demand. The defendants thereafter failed and neglected -- 2 of 7 -- Summ. Suit No.563/2020 3 to repay the amount as per the stipulation and promise given in the demand promissory note. Hence, after waiting for sufficient time, the plaintiff issued advocate’s letter dtd.24.12.2019 calling upon the defendants to make the repayment of the outstanding amount. The due and payable amount against the defendants alongwith 1.25% per month interest is Rs.85,495.89ps/-. Said amount is not paid by the defendants. Hence, plaintiff is constrained to file the suit for recovery of the said amount. 3. The suit summons were duly served on the defendants but they failed to appear. Hence, suit is posted for judgment as per order XXXVII Rule 2 (3) of Code of Civil Procedure 1908. 4. The following points arise for my determination and my findings there on are as under for the reasons stated there under :- POINTS FINDINGS 1 Whether plaintiff is entitled to recover due amount from the defendants as claimed ? A] If yes, what would be the rate of interest? Amount of Rs.85,495.89ps/- with interest @ 1.25 % per month on principal amount of Rs.60,000/- 2 What order and decree? Suit is decreed. R E A S O N S 5. In order to establish the suit claim, the plaintiff has filed following documentary evidence below Exh.07 i.e the list of documents: Sr. No. Description of documents Exhibits 1 Promissory Note dtd. 22.4.2017 being Exhibit “A” to the plaint Exh. 7/1 -- 3 of 7 -- Summ. Suit No.563/2020 4 Sr. No. Description of documents Exhibits 2 Plaintiff’s Advocates’ letter dated 24.12.2019 being Exhibit “B” to the plaint alongwith the postal records in connection with the transmission and delivery thereof. Exh. 7/2 3 Money Lender Licence Exh.7/3 4 Forms under Bombay Money Lending Act. Exh.7/4 5 Books of Accounts. Exh.7/5 AS TO POINT NO.1 :- 6. It is pertinent to note that the present suit is proceeded under order XXXVII of C.P.C as the same is not contested by the defendants. The plaintiff has to establish the entitlement for the monetary relief, undoubtedly, as per the procedure laid down in order XXXVII C.P.C, once the suit is not contested by the defendants, the plaintiff is entitled for the relief claimed in the suit plaint. Here, the plaintiff has produced above referred documents including his money lending licence, which made him entitle to lend money. 7. All the documents produced by the plaintiff at Sr.No.1 to 5 goes to establish that plaintiff has given amount of Rs.60,000/-to the defendants. The documents further prove that the amount of Rs.85,495.89ps/- is due and payable to the plaintiff from defendants jointly towards the amount. The defendants have failed to repay the said amount to the plaintiff. The documents at Sr.No.1 to 5 goes to establish that the defendants are liable to pay Rs.85,495.89ps/- to the plaintiff on the date of filing of the suit towards the said amount. They -- 4 of 7 -- Summ. Suit No.563/2020 5 failed to comply with the demand letter. In this background, it is held that plaintiff is entitled to recover sum of Rs.85,495.89ps/- from the defendant. 8. The plaintiff has claimed 1.25 % per month on the principal amount. As per section 34 of the Code of Civil Procedure the rate of interest may exceeds 6% per annum, if the transaction is commercial and there is no contract pertaining to the same between the parties. In the present case, the transaction is commercial one and there is contract existing between the parties as to the rate of interest which shall be levied. The agreed rate of interest is 1.25% per month hence, I hold that, the transaction being commercial one and the agreed rate of interest is @ 1.25% per month , said rate of interest of 1.25 per month would be just and proper to be awarded on the principal sum adjudged i.e. amount of Rs.60,000/-. Hence, point No.1 is answered in the affirmative. AS TO POINT NO.2 : 9. In view of discussion and finding on point No.1, it is held that plaintiff is entitled to recover Rs.85,495.89ps/- from the defendants with interest on principal amount of Rs.60,000/- at the rate of 1.25% per month from the date of filing of the suit till its realization. Plaintiff is also entitled to recover cost of the suit from defendants. Hence, in answered to point No.2, I proceed to pass the following order. O R D E R 1. The defendants shall pay Rs.85,495.89ps/-(Rs. Eighty Five Thousand Four Hundred Ninety Five and Eighty Nine paise Only) to the plaintiff with interest on principal amount of Rs.60,000/- at the rate of 1.25% per month -- 5 of 7 -- Summ. Suit No.563/2020 6 from the date of filing of the suit till its realization. 2. Defendants do pay costs of the suit to the plaintiff. 3. Court fee, if any, be refunded as per rule. 4. Decree be drawn accordingly. Date :18/01/2022 (A.H.KASHIKAR) AD-HOC Judge, City Civil Court, Gr.Mumbai. (Court Room No.61) Dictated on :18.1.2022 Typed on :18.1.2022 Signed on : 18.1.2022 -- 6 of 7 -- Summ. Suit No.563/2020 7 “CERTIFIED TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF THE ORIGINAL SIGNED JUDGMENT/ORDER.” 18/01/2022 3.00 p.m, ( K.M. Rana ) UPLOAD DATE AND TIME NAME OF STENOGRAPHER Name of the Judge (With Court room No.) HHJ Smt. A.H. Kashikar (C.R.No.61) Date of Pronouncement of JUDGMENT/ORDER 18/01/2022 JUDGMENT/ORDER signed by P.O.on 18/01/2022 JUDGMENT/ORDER uploaded on 18/01/2022 -- 7 of 7 --
