Skip to main content
SUIT - SHORT CAUSE CIVIL SUIT

Mahadev Dhondu ShitkarVsPanchakshri Dondula

CNR MHCC01003174202062-COURT 62 AD-HOC ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE
City Civil Court, Mumbai
Mumbai · Maharashtra (MH)
CASE DISPOSED
Uncontested--DISMISSED IN DEFAULT
Decision Date: 24th February 2022

TrustJury record updated 28 Sept 2026

Case Overview

Registration Number
101049/2020
Registration Date
14 Mar 2020

Advocates

1

For Petitioner

For Respondent

    Not available

    Parties

    2

    Petitioner

    1. 1Mahadev Dhondu Shitkar

    Respondent

    1. 1Panchakshri Dondula

    Acts & Sections

    1
    Hindu Marriage Act · Sec 38 · 39

    Case History / Proceedings

    Case History
    Date: 04-04-2020
Reason For Adjournment: National Lock Down
Next Purpose: DIRECTIONS
Next Hearing Date: 27-04-2020

Date: 27-04-2020
Business: National Lock down
Next Purpose: DIRECTIONS
Next Hearing Date: 05-06-2020

Date: 05-06-2020
Business: Case is adjd.to 23.06.20 in view of extension of Lockdown period as per office order no.83/20 dtd.01.06.20
Next Purpose: DIRECTIONS
Next Hearing Date: 23-06-2020

Date: 23-06-2020
Reason For Adjournment: Adjourned due to Covid-19
Next Purpose: DIRECTIONS
Next Hearing Date: 20-08-2020

Date: 20-08-2020
Business: Due to Covid 19
Next Purpose: DIRECTIONS
Next Hearing Date: 23-10-2020

Date: 23-10-2020
Business: None present for Plaintiffs.
None present for Defendants.
Due to Corona pandemic, it seems that parties are absent, hence case is adjourned to 27/01/2021 for Directions.
Next Purpose: DIRECTIONS
Next Hearing Date: 27-01-2021

Date: 27-01-2021
Business: None present for plaintiff
Issue writ of summons to the deft.
Matter is adjourned for service of writ of summons on the deft to 30.04.2021.
Next Purpose: WRIT OF SUMMONS
Next Hearing Date: 30-04-2021

Date: 30-04-2021
Reason For Adjournment: Adjourned due to Covid-19
Next Purpose: WRIT OF SUMMONS
Next Hearing Date: 28-07-2021

Date: 28-07-2021
Reason For Adjournment: Adjourned due to Covid-19
Next Purpose: WRIT OF SUMMONS
Next Hearing Date: 08-10-2021

Date: 08-10-2021
Business: None present for the plaintiff.
Plaintiff has not taken steps to serve the defendant with writ of summons till date, hence matter be kept for dismissal order.
Matter is adjd. for dismissal order to 16/12/2021.
Judge
Next Purpose: DISMISSAL
Next Hearing Date: 16-12-2021

Date: 16-12-2021
Business: None present for both parties.
K.B.
LO
Court busy in Judgments in SU.No.-3022 of 2008 and SU No.1296 of 2009 hence, this matter is adjourned at same stage to 24.02.2022.
Next Purpose: DISMISSAL
Next Hearing Date: 24-02-2022

Date: 24-02-2022
Business: None present for plff.
K.B.
L.O.at 4.15 p.m.
Nobody appeared for the plaintiff despite keeping back the matter till 4.15 p.m. Roznama shows that nobody has attended the matter for and on behalf of the plaintiff on any date fixed in the matter. It appeared that plaintiff is not interested in prosecuting the suit. Writ of summons is yet not served on the deft by the plaintiff. There is no propriety to keep the matter pending any further in absence of plaintiff and for want of service of writ of summons hence, suit is dismissed in default for want of prosecution.
Proceeding is closed.
Nature Of Disposal: DISMISSED IN DEFAULT
Disposal Date: 24-02-2022

    Additional Case Details

    Additional Case Details
    Filing Number: 103535/2020
Filing Date: 13-03-2020
First Hearing Date: 04th April 2020
Decision Date: 24th February 2022
Court Number And Judge: 62-COURT 62 AD-HOC  ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE

    Orders

    1
    Final Order 1
    24 Feb 2022
    Order Details: Other
Pdf Text: 24/02/2022 CORAM : H.H.J. SHRI P.P.RAJVAIDYA (C.R. NO.62)
2
SU
1049/2020
None present for plff.
K.B.
L.O.at 4.15 p.m.
Nobody appeared for the plaintiff despite keeping back the matter till
4.15 p.m. Roznama shows that nobody has attended the matter for
and on behalf of the plaintiff on any date fixed in the matter. It
appeared that plaintiff is not interested in prosecuting the suit. Writ
of summons is yet not served on the deft by the plaintiff. There is no
propriety to keep the matter pending any further in absence of
plaintiff and for want of service of writ of summons hence, suit is
dismissed in default for want of prosecution.
Proceeding is closed.
Judge
-- 1 of 1 --

    TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.