Full Order Text
Final Order 1 · 10 May 2024 · CNR MHCC010031502020
Order Details: Ex-parte Judgement Pdf Text: Com. Suit No.717/2022 : 1 : Judgement MHCC010031502020 Presented on : 12032020 Registered on : 09112022 Decided on : 10052024 Duration : YY: MM : DD 04 : 01 : 28 IN THE BOMBAY CITY CIVIL COURT AT MAZGAON, BOMBAY COMMERCIAL SUIT NO. 717 Of 2022 Exhibit25 M/s. Modernizing Trends Pvt. Ltd. Formerly Known as M/s. Modern Sales Agency (India) Pvt. Ltd., having its registered address at: G3, Neel Madhav, V. P. Road, Near Hira Mongi Navneet Hospital, Mulund (West), Mumbai. Through Authorised Representative Kumar Motumal Gurnani, Age 46 Years. ... Plaintiff. V/s. 1. M/s. Firesafe Marketing Indian Private Limited, Flat No. GA1, BlockIV, Bengal Sarachi Housing Project, Greenwood Park, Newtown, Rajarhat Kolkata Parganas North WB700156. 2. M/s. Eversafe Marketing (India) Private Limited, Registered address at: 6/21, Poddar Nagar Kolkata WB700068. Also having address at: 36D/1E/2, East Topsia Road, Near Science City & Trinamul Bhavan, Kolkata700039. ... Defendants. CORAM: HIS HONOUR JUDGE SHRI. VIRENDRA. D. KEDAR (COURT ROOM NO.14) DATE : 10th DAY OF MAY 2024 -- 1 of 8 -- Com. Suit No.717/2022 : 2 : Judgement : Appearances: The Ld. Advocate Mauzzama Ansari for Plaintiff. Defendant's Exparte. JUDGMENT The plaintiff has filed the present suit for recovery of sum of Rs.29,00,405/ as per particulars of Claim with further interest on Rs.16,71,597/ @ 24% per annum from the date of filling of the suit till its full realization. 2. Briefly stated facts of the case are as under: The plaintiff is a Private Limited Company registered under the Provisions of the Companies Act, 1956 and carrying on business as dealers of various reputed companies of valves and allied products. 3. The defendant Nos.1 and 2 are Private Limited Company. In the year 2016, the defendant No.1 placed orders with the plaintiff for the sale, supply and delivery of various types of goods. As per purchase order the plaintiff has sold, supplied and delivered the goods. At delivery time the defendant No.1 has not raised any objection about quality, quantity and price of goods and defendant No.1 agreed to pay interest @ 24% per annum on overdue amounts as per invoices. After part payment there is an invoice balance of Rs.16,71,597/ due and payable by the defendant No.1 to the plaintiff. 4. It is further submitted that, in discharge of its liability, the defendant No.1 issued six cheques totalling to Rs.16,61,545/ of HDFC Bank. Upon presentation of said cheques they were dishonoured and -- 2 of 8 -- Com. Suit No.717/2022 : 3 : Judgement returned with memos. 5. Thereafter, the plaintiff informed to Mr. Debabrata Chakrabarty, who was the Director of the defendant Nos.1 and 2 about the dishonoured and returned of cheques. The defendant No.2 through Mr. Chakrabarty enter into a Memorandum of Understanding dated 29.06.2017 and admitted liability of defendant No.1 and agreed to pay principal sum with interest totalling to Rs.17,96,597/. In discharge of said liability the defendant No.2 through its director issued 9 cheques totalling to Rs.17,96,597/ with assurance to clear the liability of the defendant No.1. Upon assurances and instructions given by the defendants, the plaintiff presented the aforesaid cheques to its bankers. However, to the shocked and surprised of the plaintiff when the said cheques were presented, they were again dishonoured and returned with reasons, “Payment stopped by drawer”. Thereafter, the plaintiff sent a demand notice dated 28.09.2017 and 27.12.2017 and thereby called upon them to clear outstanding dues. However, defendants failed to clear the dues, hence, the plaintiff had initiated Criminal Proceedings under section 138 of the N. I. Act. 6. Thereafter, the plaintiff again issued notice dated 23.02.2019, thereby called upon the defendants to make payment. Despite of receiving said notice defendants failed and neglected to pay the same. Thereafter, the plaintiff has filed PreInstitution Mediation application before DLSA, Mumbai on 14.05.2019, but defendants failed to appear, hence, the DLSA, Mumbai issued Non Starter Report dated 15.11.2019. Hence, the suit. -- 3 of 8 -- Com. Suit No.717/2022 : 4 : Judgement 7. Inspite of service, defendants failed to appear. Hence, suit proceeded Exparte against them vide order dated 20.11.2023 8. In support of its claim, the plaintiff has examined PW1 Mr. Kumar Motumal Gurnaki, the Account Executive and Authorised Representative of the Plaintiff's company at Exh.9. The plaintiff got proved document through this witness filed alongwith list Exh.10. The plaintiff has also filed evidence closing pursis at Exh.24. 9. Heard, the Ld. Advocate for the plaintiff. Perused the record. 10. Following points arise for my determination, to which I have given my findings with reasons as follows: Sr. No. Points Findings 1. Whether the plaintiff is entitled for recovery of sum of Rs.29,00,405/ as per particulars of Claim with further interest on Rs.16,71,597/ @ 24% per annum from the date of filling of the suit till its full realization, as claimed? Partly Yes. 2. What Order and Decree? As per final order. REASONS As to point no.1: 11. The plaintiff has examined PW1 Mr. Kumar Motumal. He deposed as per the contents of the plaint averments. Hence, I do not want to reproduce the same to avoid the repetitions. The plaintiff has -- 4 of 8 -- Com. Suit No.717/2022 : 5 : Judgement filed certified true extract of Board Resolution dated 10.04.2016 at Exh.11, thereby, the witness is authorised to depose on behalf of the Plaintiff's Company. The testimony of the witness remained unchallenged. 12. It is argued on behalf of the plaintiff that, the plaintiff has sold and delivered goods from timetotime to the defendants worth Rs.27,91,947/. The defendants made part payment of Rs.11,20,350/ leaving behind amount of Rs. 16,71,597/. The plaintiff raised invoices of said amount. Inspite of repeated demands, the defendants failed to clear the due amount. Initially the defendants have issued 6 cheques totalling Rs.16,61,545/ towards discharged of their liability. However, upon presentation of said cheques they were dishonoured. Thereafter, Mr. Debabrata Chakarbarty on behalf of defendant No.2 and being former director of defendant no.2 entered into a Memorandum of Understanding dated 29.06.2017 and by admitting liability issued 9 cheques of Rs.17,96,597/. However, upon presentation of said 9 cheques, with its banker, they were also dishonoured and returned with remark, 'payment stopped by drawer'. Thereafter, the plaintiff sent demand notice to defendants, but of no use. Hence, the plaintiff initiated criminal action against defendants by filling complaint under section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act. Thereafter, again the plaintiff had issued notice claiming balance amount, but defendants failed to clear the said amount. Hence, the plaintiff constrained to file the suit. To substantiate its claim the plaintiff has filed documents such as; Ledger account along with certificate u/s 65B of Evidence Act (Exh.12 Colly); Office copies of tax invoice and 01 debit note along with -- 5 of 8 -- Com. Suit No.717/2022 : 6 : Judgement certificate u/s 65B of Evidence Act (Exh.13 Colly); Duly acknowledged delivery challans along with certificate u/s 65B of Evidence Act (Exh.14 Colly); Original cheques (Exh.15 Colly); 06 Original memos (Exh.16 Colly); Copy of website of Ministry of Corporate Affairs with respect to defendant no. 1 and 2 along with certificate u/s 65B of Evidence Act (Exh.17 Colly); Original Memorandum of Understanding dated 29/06/2017 (Exh.18); 09 Original cheques (Exh.19 Colly); 09 Original memos (Exh.20 Colly); Office Copy of notice dated 23.02.2019 (Exh.21); 06 Original Postal Receipts (Exh.22 Colly) and 06 Returned Postal Packets (Exh.23 Colly). 13 Herein it is to be seen that, the plaintiff has filed PreInstitution Mediation application before DLSA, Mumbai on 14.05.2019, but defendant failed to appear, hence, the DLSA, Mumbai issued Non Starter Report dated 15.11.2019. Hence, exemption of said period needs to be given to the plaintiff in view of provisions of Section 12A (3) of the Commercial Courts Act. Thus, the suit lodged on 12.03.2020 is well within limitation. 14. Herein it is to be further seen that, in spite of receiving Writ of Summons defendants failed to appear. Therefore, in view of Order 37 Rule 2 (3) of the Code of Civil Procedure, “if defendants failed to enter an appearance, then an allegation in the plaint shall be deemed to be admitted and the plaintiff shall be entitled to a decree for any sum not exceeding the sum mentioned in the summons, together with interest at the rate specified.” -- 6 of 8 -- Com. Suit No.717/2022 : 7 : Judgement 15. Therefore, on the basis of oral and documentary evidence the plaintiff duly proved that the defendants are liable to pay amount of Rs.16,71,597/. So far as rate of interest is concerned, I am of the view that looking to the nature of business transaction and current bank rate of interest, if the defendants are directed to pay the interest @ 9% p.a., then it will subserve the purpose. Thus, in view of my above discussion, I answer to point No.1 is in partly affirmative. As to Point No.2. 16. In view of my above discussion, I pass the following order: ORDER 1. Commercial Suit No.717 of 2022 is partly decreed with Costs. 2. Defendants do pay jointly and severally an amount of Rs.16,71,597/ with further interest @ 9% per annum from the date of its due till its full realization. 3. Decree be drawn up accordingly. 4. Commercial Suit No.717 of 2022 disposed of accordingly. (Virendra D. Kedar) Judge, City Civil & Sessions Court, Date:.10.05.2024 Mazgaon, Gr. Mumbai (C.R. No.14) Dictated on : 10.05.2024 Directly typed on : 10.05.2024 Signed on : 10.05.2024 -- 7 of 8 -- Com. Suit No.717/2022 : 8 : Judgement “CERTIFIED TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF THE ORIGINAL SIGNED JUDGMENT/ORDER.” UPLOAD DATE: 13.05.2024 NAME OF STENOGRAPHER TIME: 05.20 p.m. Mr. Ashok Sudhakar Patil Name of the Judge (With Court room no.) HHJ Shri Virendra D.Kedar (Court Room No.14) Date of Pronouncement of JUDGEMENT/ORDER 10.05.2024 JUDGMENT/ORDER signed by P.O. on 10.05.2024 JUDGEMENT/ORDER uploaded on 13.05.2024 -- 8 of 8 --
