Full Order Text
Final Order 1 · 30 Jan 2025 · CNR MHCC010030752018
Order Details: Other Pdf Text: MHCC010030752018 Presented on 03/03/2018 Registered on 03/03/2018 Decided on 30/01/2025 Duration 06Y: 10M: 27D IN THE CITY CIVIL COURT AT MAZGAON, MUMBAI SUMMONS FOR JUDGMENT NO. 82 OF 2018 IN SUMMARY SUIT NO. 656 of 2017 Juharmal Punamchand Shah (Jain) ] an adult, aged 76 years ] residing at 22/24, 2nd Floor, ] Singapore Building, Vithalwadi, ] Champa Gali X Lane, Mumbai-400 002 ] through his constituted attorney ] Shru Dilipkumar Juharmal Shah ] aged 46 years. ]...Plaintiff Versus Mrs. Sushilaben Sureshkumar Shah ] an adult aged 66 years ] residing at 408, 4th Floor, Saraf Mansion ] Building No.32, Princess Street, ] Princess Co-op Housing Society, ] Mumbai-400 002. ]...Defendant Appearance:- Ld. advocate Mr. Ramesh Jain for plaintiff. Ld. advocate Mr. Roshan Bamane for defendant. -- 1 of 5 -- 2 SJ No.82/2018 in Sum Su No.656/2017 CORAM : HHJ SHRI SANGRAM SHRIHARI SHINDE C. R. NO. : 81 DATE : 30/01/2025. ORDER ( Dictated and pronounced in open Court) 01] Plaintiff has filed summons for judgment against defendant. Defendant has filed affidavit in reply to the summons for judgment and resisted it and prayed for dismissal of summons for judgment. 02] As per the plaintiff, he has filed present suit as a Power of Attorney of Mr. Juharmal Punamchand Shah (Jain). Plaintiff advanced an amount of Rs. 2,00,000/- on 02/04/2014 by cheque to defendant. Further, defendant agreed to repay said amount with interest at the rate of 12% p.a. Plaintiff to support his contention has filed photocopy of Bank Passbook. It is his further contention that defendant failed and neglected to repay the said amount. Therefore, he issued legal notice dated 18/11/2016 which is received by the defendant, however, she failed to repay the said amount. Therefore, plaintiff is entitled for principal amount with interest from defendant. It is further submitted that defendant has not raised any substantial defence or triable issue. Therefore defendant is not entitled for leave to defend the suit. Hence, summons for judgment may be allowed. 03] On the other hand, it is submitted on behalf of defendant that present suit is not maintainable under Order 37, Rule 2 of Civil Procedure Code as there is no written contract between the plaintiff and defendant. The plaintiff has filed suit merely on the basis of photocopy of his bank pass book. There is no agreement in respect to repayment of alleged amount with interest at the rate of 12% p.a. Even, POA filed by -- 2 of 5 -- 3 SJ No.82/2018 in Sum Su No.656/2017 the plaintiff is not properly executed. The plaintiff is a Money Lender however, he has not filed any documents in support of said contention. Defendant has neither approached the plaintiff nor plaintiff has advanced an amount of Rs. 2,00,000/- by cheques as contended. The defendant has not admitted any liability. Hence, defendant is entitled for unconditional leave to defend the suit. Hence, summons for judgment may be dismissed with costs. 04] Perused summons for judgment, reply by defendant and documents filed by the plaintiff. Heard both the parties. It is the contention of the plaintiff that he has advanced an amount of Rs. 2,00,000/- by cheque to the defendant on 02/04/2014. Further, in order to support his contention, he has filed photocopy of his Bank Pass Book vide List Exh. 6/2. It is pertinent to note that plaintiff has not filed original Pass Book on record. In view of settled position as laid down in Neebha Kapoor Vs. Jayantilal Khandwala and others, AIR 2008 SC 1117 wherein, Hon'ble Apex Court has observed that, ' at the time of hearing summons for judgment, plaintiff has to file original documents.' Therefore, the photocopy of passbook cannot be considered at this stage. 05] Further, it is the contention of plaintiff that as defendant has failed to repay the said amount he has issued notice dated 18/11/2016 to defendant by RPAD. The plaintiff to support his contention has filed office copy of notice along with original postal receipt and original Acknowledged card on record vide list Exh. 6/3 and 6/4. On perusing said documents, it appears that said notice is received by defendant however, there is nothing on record to show that defendant has replied to said notice. -- 3 of 5 -- 4 SJ No.82/2018 in Sum Su No.656/2017 06] It is pertinent to note that plaintiff has not filed any written agreement executed between plaintiff and defendant to show that defendant has borrowed an amount of Rs. 2,00,000/- from plaintiff and agreed to repay with interest @ 12% p.a. Therefore, the plaintiff has to prove whether present suit is maintainable under Order 37, Rule 2 of C.P.C. The defendant has raised issue that plaintiff is a Money Lender. The defendant has to prove the said fact by adducing evidence on record. Defendant has not admitted any liability. Thus, it appears that defendant has raised substantial defence that suit is not maintainable as there is no written agreement and triable issues that plaintiff is money lender. It needs adjudication and party has to lead evidence. Even, plaintiff has not filed all original document on record. Therefore, I am of the view that defendant is entitled to unconditional leave to defend the suit. Hence, I proceed to pass following order :- ORDER 1) Summons for judgment No.82/2018 in Summary Suit No. 656/2017 is disposed off as follows: (a) Defendant is granted unconditional Leave to defend the suit and directed to file written statement on or before next date. 2) No order to costs. 3) Summons for judgment No.82/2018 is disposed off accordingly. (Sangram S. Shinde) Adhoc Judge, City Civil Court Mazgaon, Mumbai. Date: 30/01/2025 Court Room No.81 Dictated on : 30/01/2025. Corrected & signed on :31/01/2025. -- 4 of 5 -- 5 SJ No.82/2018 in Sum Su No.656/2017 “CERTIFIED TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF THE ORIGINAL SIGNED JUDGMENT/ORDER” UPLOAD DATE NAME OF STENOGRAPHER 31/01/2025 Mrs. V. V. Malgaonkar Name of the Judge (with Court Room No.) Shri S. S. Shinde C.R. No.81 Date of Pronouncement of JUDGMENT/ ORDER 30/01/2025 JUDGMENT/ORDER signed by P. O. on 31/01/2025 JUDGMENT/ORDER uploaded on 31/01/2025 -- 5 of 5 --
