Skip to main content
CHAMBER SUMMONS

Nityesh KumarVsThirth Raj Yadav

CNR MHCC01003027201813-COURT 13 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE
City Civil Court, Mumbai
Mumbai · Maharashtra (MH)
CASE DISPOSED
Contested--ALLOWED
Decision Date: 04th February 2019

TrustJury record updated 10 Sept 2026

Case Overview

Registration Number
100415/2018
Registration Date
01 Mar 2018

Advocates

1

For Respondent

    Not available

    Parties

    2

    Petitioner

    1. 1Nityesh Kumar

    Respondent

    1. 1Thirth Raj Yadav

    Acts & Sections

    1
    Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Land (Vidarbha Region and Kutch Area) Act · Sec 9

    Case History / Proceedings

    Case History
    Date: 27-07-2018
    Business: Adv. Rajesh Talekar for Plaintiff present.  He tendered registered Ch/s No.415/18.  TOR.
    Adv. for Plaintiff filed application for issuance of fresh writ of summons.  It is taken on record and marked as Exh.4.
    Order - Allowed.
    Adjourned to 27.09.2018 for Service of writ of summons.
    Next Purpose: WRIT OF SUMMONS
    Next Hearing Date: 27-09-2018
    
    Date: 27-09-2018
    Business: Court is vacant.
    Next Purpose: WRIT OF SUMMONS
    Next Hearing Date: 04-02-2019
    
    Date: 04-02-2019
    Business: Adv.Rajesh Talekar for plaintiff present.
    Heard.
    F.R.S.R. the following order is passed
                     ORDER ON CH/S.
    1. Chamber summons No.415/2018 is allowed.
    2. Issue writ of summons to defendant through paper publication in daily newspaper and national newspaper circulated widely.
    Nature Of Disposal: ALLOWED
    Disposal Date: 04-02-2019

    Additional Case Details

    Additional Case Details
    Filing Number: 103276/2018
    Filing Date: 01-03-2018
    First Hearing Date: 27th July 2018
    Decision Date: 04th February 2019
    Court Number And Judge: 13-COURT 13 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE

    Orders

    2
    Final Order 1
    04 Feb 2019
    Order Details: Chamber summons
    Pdf Text: Chamber Summons 415 of 18 in Summary SU 721/15
    IN THE BOMBAY CITY CIVIL COURT AT BOMBAY
    CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.415 OF 2018
    IN
    SUMMARY SUIT NO.721/2015
    Nityesh Kumar ...Plaintiff
    Vs.
    Thirth Raj Yadav ....Defendant
    (Before : Shashikala S. Nagur)
    (C.R.NO.13)
    DATE : 04th February 2019
    APPEARANCE
    Adv.Rajesh B. Talekar for Plaintiff present.
    None present for defendant.
    ORDER
    1. The chamber summons is filed to serve the writ of summons to
    the defendants through substitute service. The application is supported
    by affidavit of Nityesh Prasad who on oath stated that the bailiff of the
    Court attempted to serve the defendant. All the packets containing the
    writ of summons has written with remark as “Left”, “No Such Person”,
    “Not Known”, “Incomplete Address”, “Door Locked”, “Not Residing
    Hence Return to the Sender”.
    2. The defendant could not be served and the address shown
    in the title of the plaint is the last known address. Hence, pass
    following order.
    ORDER
    1. Chamber summons No.415/2018 is allowed.
    2. Issue writ of summons to defendant through paper publication in
    daily newspaper and national newspaper circulated widely.
    (S. S. NAGUR )
    ADHOC SESSIONS JUDGE,
    CITY CIVIL COURT,
    GREATER MUMBAI
    DATE : 04.02.2019
    -- 1 of 1 --
    Order 1
    04 Feb 2019
    Order Details: Chamber summons
    Pdf Text: Chamber Summons 415 of 18 in Summary SU 721/15
    IN THE BOMBAY CITY CIVIL COURT AT BOMBAY
    CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.415 OF 2018
    IN
    SUMMARY SUIT NO.721/2015
    Nityesh Kumar ...Plaintiff
    Vs.
    Thirth Raj Yadav ....Defendant
    (Before : Shashikala S. Nagur)
    (C.R.NO.13)
    DATE : 04th February 2019
    APPEARANCE
    Adv.Rajesh B. Talekar for Plaintiff present.
    None present for defendant.
    ORDER
    1. The chamber summons is filed to serve the writ of summons to
    the defendants through substitute service. The application is supported
    by affidavit of Nityesh Prasad who on oath stated that the bailiff of the
    Court attempted to serve the defendant. All the packets containing the
    writ of summons has written with remark as “Left”, “No Such Person”,
    “Not Known”, “Incomplete Address”, “Door Locked”, “Not Residing
    Hence Return to the Sender”.
    2. The defendant could not be served and the address shown
    in the title of the plaint is the last known address. Hence, pass
    following order.
    ORDER
    1. Chamber summons No.415/2018 is allowed.
    2. Issue writ of summons to defendant through paper publication in
    daily newspaper and national newspaper circulated widely.
    (S. S. NAGUR )
    ADHOC SESSIONS JUDGE,
    CITY CIVIL COURT,
    GREATER MUMBAI
    DATE : 04.02.2019
    -- 1 of 1 --

    TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.