Order Details: Ex-parte Judgement Pdf Text: Sum.Suit No.406/2018 1 Registered on : 02.04.2018 Decided on : 02.02.2019 Duration : 00 08 00 Y M D EXHIBIT IN THE BOMBAY CITY CIVIL COURT AT BOMBAY SUMMARY SUIT NO.406 OF 2018 Baban Devaji Jankar, Age 50 yrs. Of Mumbai, an adult Indian Inhabitant carrying business of money lending at and from Vijay Niwas, Jivdaya Lane, L.B.S. Marg, Ghatkopar (West) Mumbai400086. .....Plaintiff V/s. Smt.Theresa Shah Age not known of Mumbai, an adult Indian…
SUMMARY CIVIL SUIT - SUMMARY SUIT
BABAN DEVAJI JANKARVsSmt. Theresa Shah
CNR MHCC01003019201828-COURT 28 ADD SESSIONS JUDGE
City Civil Court, Mumbai
Mumbai · Maharashtra (MH)
CASE DISPOSED
Contested--DECREED
Decision Date: 02nd February 2019
TrustJury record updated 10 Sept 2026
Case Overview
- Registration Number
- 100406/2018
- Registration Date
- 02 Apr 2018
Advocates
1For Petitioner
For Respondent
Not available
Parties
2Petitioner
Respondent
Acts & Sections
1Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Land (Vidarbha Region and Kutch Area) Act · Sec 9
Case History / Proceedings
Case History
Date: 25-06-2018 Business: Adv. Ramesh Jain for Plaintiff present. None for Defendant. Matter is adjd. to 04/08/2018 for Report. Next Purpose: REPORT Next Hearing Date: 04-08-2018 Date: 04-08-2018 Business: Adv. Ramesh Jain for Plaintiff present. None for Defendant. Plaint. V.P. List of documents. Memorandum of address. Affidavit of service. Matter is adjd. to 17/09/2018 for Exparte order. Next Purpose: ORDER Next Hearing Date: 17-09-2018 Date: 17-09-2018 Business: None for Plaintiff None for Defendant AS the court busy in judgment suit no. 9958/87, due to paucity of time. Matter is adjd. to 10/10/2018 for exparte order. Next Purpose: ORDER Next Hearing Date: 10-10-2018 Date: 10-10-2018 Business: Adv. for Plaintiff absent. None for Defendant. As the defendant has not appeared in the suit, though served hence suit is proceeded exparte. Matter is adjd. to 13/12/2018 for Exparte evidence. L.O. Adv. Ramesh Jain for plaintiff present. Plaint. V.P. List of documents. Memorandum of address. Advocate for plaintiff has filed. Non appearance certificate. Evidence affidavit List of document. Next Purpose: ARGUMENTS Next Hearing Date: 13-12-2018 Date: 13-12-2018 Business: Adv. Ramesh Jain for Plaintiff present. None for Defendant. Heard the argument of advocate for plaintiff. Matter is adjd. to 10/01/2019 for Exparte Judgment. Next Purpose: EX-PARTE JUDGEMENT Next Hearing Date: 10-01-2019 Date: 10-01-2019 Business: Adv. for Plaintiff absent. None for Defendant. Court is busy in dictating Judgment in Session case no.169/14 and in High Court Timebound matter no.3734/11 hence due to paucity of time, Matter is adjd. to 19/01/2019 for Exparte Judgment. Next Purpose: EX-PARTE JUDGEMENT Next Hearing Date: 19-01-2019 Date: 19-01-2019 Business: Adv. Ramesh Jain for Plaintiff present. None for Defendant. Court is busy in dictating Judgment in Civil Suit no.3385/09 hence, due to paucity of time, Matter is adjd. to 02/02/2019 for Exparte Judgment. Next Purpose: EX-PARTE JUDGEMENT Next Hearing Date: 02-02-2019 Date: 02-02-2019 Business: Suit is Exparte decreed. Nature Of Disposal: DECREED Disposal Date: 02-02-2019
Additional Case Details
Additional Case Details
Filing Number: 103370/2018 Filing Date: 28-02-2018 First Hearing Date: 25th June 2018 Decision Date: 02nd February 2019 Court Number And Judge: 28-COURT 28 ADD SESSIONS JUDGE
Orders
2Final Order 1Full order available
02 Feb 2019
Order 1Full order available
02 Feb 2019
Order Details: Ex-parte Judgement Pdf Text: Sum.Suit No.406/2018 1 Registered on : 02.04.2018 Decided on : 02.02.2019 Duration : 00 08 00 Y M D EXHIBIT IN THE BOMBAY CITY CIVIL COURT AT BOMBAY SUMMARY SUIT NO.406 OF 2018 Baban Devaji Jankar, Age 50 yrs. Of Mumbai, an adult Indian Inhabitant carrying business of money lending at and from Vijay Niwas, Jivdaya Lane, L.B.S. Marg, Ghatkopar (West) Mumbai400086. .....Plaintiff V/s. Smt.Theresa Shah Age not known of Mumbai, an adult Indian…
TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.
