Full Order Text
Final Order 1 · 13 Jan 2020 · CNR MHCC010030052019
Order Details: Copy of Judgment Pdf Text: Filed on : 03.04.2019 Registered on : 03.04.2019 Decided on : 13.01.2020 Duration : Year 00 Month09 Days10 IN THE BOMBAY CITY CIVIL COURT AT BOMBAY SUMMARY SUIT NO.462 OF 2019 (CNR NO. MH CC010030052019) Exhibit13 Galaxy Metal Impex. Through its proprietor Satyanarayan Chinnayya Jakkul, Age.: 49 years, Indian Inhabitant, Registered Office at 502, Fifth Floor, Kapurwala Building, 218/220, Samuel Street, Masjid Bunder, Mumbai – 400 003. ….Plaintiff V/s. M/s. Sangli Technochem Industries, Through its proprietor Mr. Mahendra Shelke, Address : S.No.226/2, Plot No.28, Khot Mala, Kananwadi Road, Near Yamgar Pipe Factory, A/P. Sawali – 416410. Tal. Miraj, Dist. : Sangli. ... Defendant SUIT FOR RECOVERY OF RS.63,199/ Appearance: Mr.Vasant Bansode, Advocate for the Plaintiff. Exparte against Defendant. CORAM : HER HONOUR JUDGE SABIHA. G. SHAIKH Adhoc Judge City Civil Court, Gr. Bombay (C.R.NO.59) DATE : 13 th January, 2020 -- 1 of 6 -- 2 Sum. Suit No462 of 2019 JUDGMENT (Dictated and pronounced in Open Court.) 1. This is a summary suit under order XXXVII of Code of Civil Procedure 1908. The facts of the case are as under : 2. The Plaintiff is a proprietary firm having their registered office at 502, Fifth Floor, Kapurwala Building, 218/220, Samuel Street, Masjid Bunder, Mumbai – 400 003. Defendant is a proprietary firm which is incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956. The plaintiff is engaged in the business of stockiest and dealers in Tools and Alloy Steel, Carbon Steel, Stainless Steel, Mild Steel, Aluminum, Copper, Brass, Ferrous and non Ferrous Metals etc. Pursuant to the purchase order received from the Defendant's at Plaintiff's aforesaid place of business situated at Mumbai, plaintiff sold, dispatched and delivered goods as per their requirement and raised invoices. It is the case of the plaintiff that plaintiff had delivered goods to the defendant from time to time on credit basis as defendant have been committed to clear the payment within 30 days credit. The defendant had failed to pay amount of Rs.63,199/ to the plaintiff in spite of various requests made by him and receipt of the legal notice issued by the plaintiff dated 25th May 2018. Hence, plaintiff is constrained to file the suit for recovery of the said amount. The total suit claim of the plaintiff for Rs.63,199/. 3. The suit summons were duly served on the defendant but he failed to appear. Hence, suit is posted for judgment as per order XXXVII Rule 2(3) of Code of Civil Procedure 1908 judgment. -- 2 of 6 -- 3 Sum. Suit No462 of 2019 4. The following points arise for my determination and my findings thereon are as under for the reasons stated there under: Sr. No. POINTS FINDINGS. 1. What is due and payable from the defendants to the plaintiff ? A] If yes, what would be the rate of interest? Amount of Rs.63,199/ with interest @ 10 % per annum. 2. What order and decree? As per final order. REASONS 5. The witness – Jakkul Chinnayya Satyanarayan Authorised representative of the plaintiff has filed his affidavit at Exhibit 6. In order to prove the case of the plaintiff filed following documentary evidence. Exhibit. No. Description of documents Date Exhibit8 This document is original power of attorney of Jakkul Aruna dated 19/05/2017 Exhibit 9 This document is original invoice no. 0284 of Rs. 1,35,500/ dated 16/09/2017 Exhibit 10 This document is demand notice issued by plaintiff's advocate dated 25/05/2018 Exhibit 11 This document is original postal receipt dated 26/05/2018 Exhibit 12 This document is original postal return envelop issued by plaintiff's advocate on defendant dated 26/05/2018 AS TO POINT NO.1 6. All the documents produced by the plaintiff at list Exhibit 8 to 12 -- 3 of 6 -- 4 Sum. Suit No462 of 2019 goes to establish that plaintiff has given total loan of Rs.63,199/ to defendant. The documents further prove that the amount of Rs.63,199/ is due and payable to the plaintiff company from defendants towards the goods purchased by defendant. But, defendant has paid sum of Rs.72,301/ to the plaintiff and failed to pay balance amount of Rs.63,199/ towards sale of goods. The documents at list Exhibit 8 to 12 goes to establish that defendants are liable to pay Rs.63,199/ to the plaintiff on the date of filing of the suit towards the purchase of goods and therefore he has giving false excuse for not repaying the purchase of goods, he failed and neglected to reply the outstanding amount which was taken as goods purchased from the plaintiff. In this background, it is held that plaintiff is entitled to recover sum of Rs.63,199/ from the defendant. 7. The plaintiff has claimed 18% per annum on the principal amount. As per section 34 of the Code of Civil Procedure the rate of interest may exceed 18% per annum, if the transaction is commercial and there is no contract pertaining to the same between the parties. In the present case the transaction is a commercial one and there is no express contract existing between the parties as to the rate of interest which shall be levied. Therefore, the transaction is being commercial transaction be rate of interest at the rate of 10% per annum would be just and proper to be awarded on the principal sum adjudged i.e. amount of Rs.63,199/. Hence, point no.1 is answered in the affirmative. As to point no.2: 8. In view of discussion and finding on point no.1 it is held that the plaintiff is entitled to recover Rs.63,199/ from the defendant with -- 4 of 6 -- 5 Sum. Suit No462 of 2019 interest at the rate of Rs.10% per annum from the date of filing of the suit till its realization. Plaintiff is also entitled to recover cost of the suit from the defendant. Hence, in answered to point no.2 I proceed to pass the following order : : ORDER: 1. The defendant shall pay Rs.63,199/ (Rupees Six Thousand, One Hundred Ninety Nine only) to the plaintiff with interest at the rate of 10% per annum from the date of filing of the suit till its realization. 2. Defendant do pay costs of the suit to the plaintiff. 3. Decree be drawn accordingly. 4. Court fee, if any, be refunded as per the rules. (S. G. Shaikh) Adhoc Judge City Civil Court, Gr. Bombay Date : 13/01/2020 Typed on : 13.01.2020 Signed on : -- 5 of 6 -- 6 Sum. Suit No462 of 2019 “CERTIFIED TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF THE ORIGINAL SIGNED ORDER.” UPLOAD DATE TIME STENOGRAPHER NAME 20.01.2020 05.20 p.m. Mrs. P.R.Wagh Name of the Judge H.H.J. Sabiha.G.Shaikh. Adhoc Judge. (Court Room No.59) Date of pronouncement of Order 13.01.2020 Order signed by P.O. on 13.01.2020 Order uploaded on 20.01.2020 -- 6 of 6 --
