Skip to main content
NOTICE OF MOTION

Metropolitian Equipments and Consultants Pvt. Ltd.VsAarti Steels Ltd. and Ors.

CNR MHCC01003004201814-COURT 14 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE
City Civil Court, Mumbai
Mumbai · Maharashtra (MH)
CASE DISPOSED
Uncontested--DISMISSED IN DEFAULT
Decision Date: 23rd March 2021

TrustJury record updated 10 Sept 2026

Case Overview

Registration Number
100866/2018
Registration Date
01 Mar 2018

Advocates

2

For Respondent

    Not available

    Parties

    2

    Acts & Sections

    1
    Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Land (Vidarbha Region and Kutch Area) Act · Sec 9

    Case History / Proceedings

    Case History
    Date: 18-06-2018
    Business: Adv Ms. Hetal Gala for plff. Present.
    Adv Mr. Prakash Hwlky  for deft  present.
    Adv for plff. tendered registered Notice of Motion 866/18 along with affidavit.
    Adv for plff. tendered service affidavit in NM 866/18 along with postal envelope which is returned with postal endorsement as not claim/ intimation delivered to advocate Dhebav. Adv for deft. no. 2 accepted that service is done to him.  Adv for deft. no.2 submitted that unless copy of plaint is provide to him, he cannot give reply to Notice of Motion 866/18 . The plff. is directed to supply copy of plaint to deft no.2.
    Adjd. For compliance on 21.08.2018.
    Next Purpose: COMPLIANCE
    Next Hearing Date: 21-08-2018
    
    Date: 21-08-2018
    Business: Adv. Ms. Hetal Gada for Plaintiff Present.
    Adv. Prakash Mulky for defendant no. 2 Present and filed reply to N.M. 866/18 alongwith V.P are t.o.r
    Adjd to 09/01/2019 for hearing on N.M.
    Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
    Next Hearing Date: 09-01-2019
    
    Date: 09-01-2019
    Business: Adv. Hetal Gala for Plaintiff Present
    Adv. Prakash Mulky for defendant no.2 Present.
    Adjd 11/04/2019 for hearing on N.M
    Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
    Next Hearing Date: 11-04-2019
    
    Date: 11-04-2019
    Business: Adv. Ms. Hetal Gada for Plaintiff Present.
    Adv. Mr. Prakash Mulki for defendant no. 2 Present.
    As Court is busy in dictating Judgment in SU 4573/08 and N.M. 1424/18 and 1425/18.
    Adjd to 05/08/2019 for hearing on N.M
    Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
    Next Hearing Date: 05-08-2019
    
    Date: 05-08-2019
    Business: P.O. is on Training.
    Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
    Next Hearing Date: 06-09-2019
    
    Date: 06-09-2019
    Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
    Next Hearing Date: 07-09-2019
    
    Date: 07-09-2019
    Business: None present.
    Matter is Adjd for N/M Hearing to 22.10.2019.
    Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
    Next Hearing Date: 22-10-2019
    
    Date: 22-10-2019
    Business: None for the Plaintiff.
    Adv for deft no.2 Mr.Prakash Mudaki present.
    Matter is Adjd for Dismissal of N/M to 20.01.2019.
    Next Purpose: NM FOR DISMISSAL
    Next Hearing Date: 20-01-2020
    
    Date: 20-01-2020
    Business: None for the Plaintiff.
    Adv for deft no.2 Mr.Prakash Mwlky present.
    Court is busy in passing order in N/M 3457/2019 in SUM 303/2017. Hence, Board is discharge.
    Matter is Adjd for N/M Dismissal to 05.03.2020.
    Next Purpose: NM FOR DISMISSAL
    Next Hearing Date: 05-03-2020
    
    Date: 05-03-2020
    Business: None for the Plaintiff.
    Adv for deft no.2 Mr.Prakash Mulky present.
    Adv for deft no.2 stated that N/M be dismissed as plaintiff has fail to remain present and proceed to N/M.
    Matter is lastly Adjd for N/M Dismissal to 07.04.2020.
    Next Purpose: NM FOR DISMISSAL
    Next Hearing Date: 07-04-2020
    
    Date: 07-04-2020
    Next Purpose: NM FOR DISMISSAL
    Next Hearing Date: 18-04-2020
    
    Date: 18-04-2020
    Reason For Adjournment: National Lock Down
    Next Purpose: NM FOR DISMISSAL
    Next Hearing Date: 08-05-2020
    
    Date: 08-05-2020
    Business: National Lock Down
    Next Purpose: NM FOR DISMISSAL
    Next Hearing Date: 29-05-2020
    
    Date: 29-05-2020
    Reason For Adjournment: National Lock Down
    Next Purpose: NM FOR DISMISSAL
    Next Hearing Date: 16-06-2020
    
    Date: 16-06-2020
    Business: National Lockdown
    Next Purpose: NM FOR DISMISSAL
    Next Hearing Date: 29-07-2020
    
    Date: 29-07-2020
    Reason For Adjournment: Adjourned due to Covid-19
    Next Purpose: NM FOR DISMISSAL
    Next Hearing Date: 19-09-2020
    
    Date: 19-09-2020
    Business: Due to National Lockdown (Covid-19) matter adjd to 08.12.2020.
    Next Purpose: NM FOR DISMISSAL
    Next Hearing Date: 08-12-2020
    
    Date: 08-12-2020
    Business: None present.
    Matter is Adjd for N/M Dismissal to 23.03.2021.
    Next Purpose: NM FOR DISMISSAL
    Next Hearing Date: 23-03-2021
    
    Date: 23-03-2021
    Business: None present for plaintiff.
    Adv. Prakash Mulky for defendant no.2 present.
    Order below NM No. 866/18
    Perused the notice of motion. None appeared for the plaintiff. Adv.for the defendant is present. I have perused the roznama of the dates prior the lock down that is from the year 2019. It shows that August 2019 nobody is attending this notice of motion on behalf of the plaintiff. The long absence of the original plaintiff prior to period of lock down of the Courts shows that the plaintiff is not interested in continuing this notice of motion which was in fact for restoration of the original suit. This notice of motion is kept for dismissal since 22.10.2019. Inspite of that none appeared on behalf of the plaintiff hence Notice of Motion No. 866/18 stands dismissed in default.
    Nature Of Disposal: DISMISSED IN DEFAULT
    Disposal Date: 23-03-2021

    Additional Case Details

    Additional Case Details
    Filing Number: 103378/2018
    Filing Date: 01-03-2018
    First Hearing Date: 18th June 2018
    Decision Date: 23rd March 2021
    Court Number And Judge: 14-COURT 14  ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE

    Orders

    2
    Final Order 1
    23 Mar 2021
    Order Details: Notice of Motion
    Pdf Text: None present for plaintiff.
    Adv. Prakash Mulky for defendant no.2 present.
    Order below NM No. 866/18
    Perused the notice of motion. None appeared for the plaintiff. Adv.for the defendant
    is present. I have perused the roznama of the dates prior the lock down that is from
    the year 2019. It shows that August 2019 nobody is attending this notice of motion
    on behalf of the plaintiff. The long absence of the original plaintiff prior to period of
    lock down of the Courts shows that the plaintiff is not interested in continuing this
    notice of motion which was in fact for restoration of the original suit. This notice of
    motion is kept for dismissal since 22.10.2019. Inspite of that none appeared on
    behalf of the plaintiff hence Notice of Motion No. 866/18 stands dismissed in
    default.
    -- 1 of 1 --
    Order 1
    23 Mar 2021
    Order Details: Notice of Motion
    Pdf Text: None present for plaintiff.
    Adv. Prakash Mulky for defendant no.2 present.
    Order below NM No. 866/18
    Perused the notice of motion. None appeared for the plaintiff. Adv.for the defendant
    is present. I have perused the roznama of the dates prior the lock down that is from
    the year 2019. It shows that August 2019 nobody is attending this notice of motion
    on behalf of the plaintiff. The long absence of the original plaintiff prior to period of
    lock down of the Courts shows that the plaintiff is not interested in continuing this
    notice of motion which was in fact for restoration of the original suit. This notice of
    motion is kept for dismissal since 22.10.2019. Inspite of that none appeared on
    behalf of the plaintiff hence Notice of Motion No. 866/18 stands dismissed in
    default.
    -- 1 of 1 --

    TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.