Skip to main content
SUIT - SHORT CAUSE CIVIL SUIT

Smt. Krushnavati Ramchandra MhatreVsMCGM

CNR MHCC01002983201811-COURT 11 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE
City Civil Court, Mumbai
Mumbai · Maharashtra (MH)
CASE DISPOSED
Uncontested--DISMISSED IN DEFAULT
Decision Date: 04th February 2021

TrustJury record updated 10 Sept 2026

Case Overview

Registration Number
100660/2018
Registration Date
05 Mar 2018

Advocates

1

For Petitioner

For Respondent

    Not available

    Parties

    2

    Acts & Sections

    1
    Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Land (Vidarbha Region and Kutch Area) Act · Sec 9

    Case History / Proceedings

    Case History
    Date: 19-03-2018
    Business: Perused documents. Prima facie it appears that the defendant has issued notice u/s 314 of MMC Act on 22-05-2017, in respect of installation of G plus 1 structure, contrary to provisions of section 312(1), 314(d) of MMC Act at Keni Road, Bhandup Village. It seems that suit property is the structure on the land owned by Jaaibai Atmaram Mhatre on Survey No.522/1. It appears that notice has been given in view of construction erected on street/Kini Road and not in respect of suit property. Further prima facie reveals that since 22-05-2017 the Plaintiff has not replied the notice. Thus, it is not fit case to grant ad-interim relief. Hence it is rejected.
    Matter adjd to 18-04-2018 for reply to N/M / W/st.
    Next Purpose: REPLY
    Next Hearing Date: 18-04-2018
    
    Date: 18-04-2018
    Business: H.H.J. is on leave today. Hence board is discharged.
    Next Purpose: REPLY
    Next Hearing Date: 02-07-2018
    
    Date: 02-07-2018
    Business: Plaintiff and adv absent.
    Adv Tondwalkar for def/BMC present.
    Adjourned to 03.09.2018  for reply.
    Next Purpose: REPLY
    Next Hearing Date: 03-09-2018
    
    Date: 03-09-2018
    Business: Court is vacant. Hence today board is discharged.
    Next Purpose: REPLY
    Next Hearing Date: 15-10-2018
    
    Date: 15-10-2018
    Business: Court is busy in hearing arguments and dictating orders on NM nos.143/09, 3802/18 and 1791/17 as well as hearing argument on Notice of Motion in suit no.1320/15, hence board is discharged and case is adjourned to 17/12/2018.
    Next Purpose: REPLY
    Next Hearing Date: 17-12-2018
    
    Date: 17-12-2018
    Business: Court is busy in hearing and dictating order on Notice of Motion in suit no.2661/10 and dictating order on Chamber Summons in suit no.1692/18, hence case is adjourned to 19/03/2019.
    Next Purpose: NM REPLYREJOINDER
    Next Hearing Date: 19-03-2019
    
    Date: 19-03-2019
    Business: Court is busy in hearing and dictating order on Chamber Summons in suit nos.705/19, 706/19 and 709/19 as well as Court has to hear urgent matters, hence case is adjourned to 04/07/2019.
    Next Purpose: NM REPLYREJOINDER
    Next Hearing Date: 04-07-2019
    
    Date: 04-07-2019
    Business: As court is busy in NM hearing in suit No. 1406/17. The Board is discharged.
    The case is adjourned to 27.08.2019 for NM reply.
    Next Purpose: NM REPLYREJOINDER
    Next Hearing Date: 27-08-2019
    
    Date: 27-08-2019
    Business: Court is on leave. Hence today board is discharged.
    Next Purpose: NM REPLYREJOINDER
    Next Hearing Date: 25-09-2019
    
    Date: 25-09-2019
    Business: Court is on leave. Hence today board is discharged.
    Next Purpose: NM REPLYREJOINDER
    Next Hearing Date: 02-11-2019
    
    Date: 02-11-2019
    Business: Advocate Kamble h/f adv. Mirashi for plaintiff present.
    Advocate Ms.Mhatre h/f adv. Ms. Chavan  for defendant/ MCGM present and sought time. Time is granted.
    The case is adjourned to 03.02.2020  for NM reply.
    Next Purpose: NM REPLYREJOINDER
    Next Hearing Date: 07-11-2019
    
    Date: 07-11-2019
    Business: By praecipe
    Advocate Ms. Mansi Pilankar h/f adv. Mirashi for plaintiff present.
    Advocate Ms.Mhatre for defendant/MCGM present.
    KB
    LO at 3.46 pm,
    Adv. Mirashi for plaintiff present.
    Advocate Ms. Chavan for defendant /MCGM present.
    Mr. Milind Sawant, Jr. Engineer \''S\'' ward present.
    Advocate for plaintiff submitted that he is pressing for ad-interim relief. Advocate Ms. Chavan requested to keep back the matter for filing affidavit of the officer along with documents.
    Advocate for plaintiff was called upon to submit whether second Notice of Motion is maintainable without change in circumstances.  He submitted that the order passed by this Court is being misinterpreted by the defendant and the threat of demolition is renewed.  Therefore the plaintiff has moved another NM against the officers of the defendant.
    KB
    LO at 4.45 pm,
    Same appearance.
    Advocate for plaintiff submitted that he is not pressing for ad-interim relief and NM be made returnable.
    Leave is granted to register NM. It is made returnable by next date.
    Already the case is adjourned to 03.02.2020 for NM reply.
    Next Purpose: NM REPLYREJOINDER
    Next Hearing Date: 03-02-2020
    
    Date: 03-02-2020
    Business: Adv. Mr. Satish Adasul for plaintiff present.
    Adv. Mrs. Tondawalkar for deft./MCGM present, prayed for adjd.
    Exh.2- V/P of adv. Mr. Satish Adasul on behalf of plff,
    Matter is adjd. for NM hearing on 26.02.2020.
    Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
    Next Hearing Date: 26-02-2020
    
    Date: 26-02-2020
    Business: None for plaintiff, it appear that Draft NM tendered by plff is not collected for registration.  Plff to register the NM within two weeks, otherwise court may proceed for dismissal.
    Adv. Mrs. Mhatre for deft./MCGM, prayed for time to file reply.
    Matter is adjd. for dismissal on 17.06.2020.
    Next Purpose: DISMISSAL
    Next Hearing Date: 17-06-2020
    
    Date: 17-06-2020
    Business: Adjd. to
    Next Purpose: DISMISSAL
    Next Hearing Date: 03-09-2020
    
    Date: 03-09-2020
    Business: adjd. to
    Next Purpose: DISMISSAL
    Next Hearing Date: 11-11-2020
    
    Date: 11-11-2020
    Reason For Adjournment: Adjourned due to Covid-19
    Next Purpose: DISMISSAL
    Next Hearing Date: 10-12-2020
    
    Date: 10-12-2020
    Business: None for plaintiff.
    Adv. Tondwalkar  for deft./MCGM present.
    Despite intimation in roznama dtd. 26-02-2020, Plaintiff is failed to register the NM.
    Matter is adjd.to 04-02-2021 for Dismissal
    Reason For Adjournment: Adjourned due to Covid-19
    Next Purpose: DISMISSAL
    Next Hearing Date: 04-02-2021
    
    Date: 04-02-2021
    Business: None present for plaintiff.
    Adv. Ms. Tondwalkar for deft./MCGM present.
    Perused the record. Direction was given to the plaintiff to get register the two notices of motion. However, plaintiff fail to comply the direction of the court. Further plaintiff has not taken any steps to proceed the suit. Hence, suit and draft NMs are hereby dismissed in default. Draft NMs be registered for the statistical purpose.
                                                                                   Judge
    Nature Of Disposal: DISMISSED IN DEFAULT
    Disposal Date: 04-02-2021

    Additional Case Details

    Additional Case Details
    Filing Number: 103365/2018
    Filing Date: 28-02-2018
    First Hearing Date: 02nd May 2018
    Decision Date: 04th February 2021
    Court Number And Judge: 11-COURT 11  ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE

    Orders

    2
    Final Order 1
    04 Feb 2021
    Order Details: Other
    Pdf Text: 04.02.2021 CORAM : H.H.J.SHRI. G.B. GURAO(C.R.NO.11)
    SU. 660/18 None present for plaintiff.
    Adv. Ms. Tondwalkar for deft./MCGM present.
    Perused the record. Direction was given to the plaintiff to
    get register the two notices of motion. However, plaintiff
    fail to comply the direction of the court. Further plaintiff
    has not taken any steps to proceed the suit. Hence, suit
    and draft NMs are hereby dismissed in default. Draft
    NMs be registered for the statistical purpose.
    Judge
    -- 1 of 1 --
    Order 1
    04 Feb 2021
    Order Details: Other
    Pdf Text: 04.02.2021 CORAM : H.H.J.SHRI. G.B. GURAO(C.R.NO.11)
    SU. 660/18 None present for plaintiff.
    Adv. Ms. Tondwalkar for deft./MCGM present.
    Perused the record. Direction was given to the plaintiff to
    get register the two notices of motion. However, plaintiff
    fail to comply the direction of the court. Further plaintiff
    has not taken any steps to proceed the suit. Hence, suit
    and draft NMs are hereby dismissed in default. Draft
    NMs be registered for the statistical purpose.
    Judge
    -- 1 of 1 --

    TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.