Skip to main content
NOTICE OF MOTION

Mohd. Salim Javed Akhtar SiddiquiVsMCGM

CNR MHCC01002963202111-COURT 02 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE
Fort, City Civil Court
Mumbai · Maharashtra (MH)
CASE DISPOSED
Contested--OTHER
Decision Date: 24th July 2026

TrustJury record updated 01 Oct 2026

Case Overview

Registration Number
100928/2021
Registration Date
24 Mar 2021

Advocates

1

For Respondent

    Not available

    Parties

    2

    Acts & Sections

    1
    CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE · Sec 9

    Case History / Proceedings

    Case History
    Date: 24-03-2021
    Next Purpose: NOTICE OF MOTION
    Next Hearing Date: 05-04-2021
    
    Date: 05-04-2021
    Next Purpose: NOTICE OF MOTION
    Next Hearing Date: 28-06-2021
    
    Date: 28-06-2021
    Reason For Adjournment: Adjourned due to Covid-19
    Next Purpose: NOTICE OF MOTION
    Next Hearing Date: 27-08-2021
    
    Date: 27-08-2021
    Business: Court is Vacant. Matter adj. to next date.
    Next Purpose: NOTICE OF MOTION
    Next Hearing Date: 13-10-2021
    
    Date: 13-10-2021
    Business: Court is vacant. Matter is adj. to next date.
    Next Purpose: NOTICE OF MOTION
    Next Hearing Date: 01-12-2021
    
    Date: 01-12-2021
    Business: Adv. Mr. V. T. Dubey for Plaintiff present.
    NM 928/21	Adv. Mr. Khandagale for Defendant/BMC present.
    	Heard both the sides on NM Ad-interim.
    	Earlier order, if any, to continue, till the next date.
    	Matter adj. to 03/12/2021 for Ad-interim Orders.
    Next Purpose: NM  ORDERS
    Next Hearing Date: 03-12-2021
    
    Date: 03-12-2021
    Business: None present for Plaintiff.
    Adv. Mr. Khandagale for Defendant/MCGM present.
    Earlier order, if any, to continue till the next date.
    Matter adjd for NM order to 17/12/2021.
    Next Purpose: NM  ORDERS
    Next Hearing Date: 17-12-2021
    
    Date: 17-12-2021
    Business: None present for Plaintiff.
    Adv. Mr. Khandagale for Defendant/MCGM is present.
    KB  LO 4.45 pm.
    Adv. Mr. V.T. Dueby for plaintiff is present.
    F.R.S.R. following order is passed:
                       ORDER
    1. Ad interim relief is refused.
    Adv. for the plaintiff filed application for continuation of earlier order.
    O-Say to other side. Say filed.
    Heard both the sides.
    The record shows that since long the matter was pending for NM hearing and after hearing the parties, the ad-interim relief on NM is refused by the Court today itself. Now, the plaintiff wants to assail this order by filing the appeal. Needless to say, that if the protection against the suit structure is not temporarily granted, and the defendant is left open to proceed against the suit structure, the very purpose of filing of this suit would fail. At the same time, there is no justifying reason to extend this protection for the period of four weeks, as is prayed. In the result, to facilitate the plaintiff to secure appropriate order from the Hon\''ble Appellate Court, the defendant is restrained to proceed against the suit structure till the next date.
    At this juncture, Adv. for the defendant objected for giving the longer date. Hence, considering the ensuing the Winter Vacation, the matter is adjourned on 03/01/2022.
    Authenticated copy of roznama be supplied to both the parties.
    Adjourned for NM hearing to 03/01/2022.
    Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
    Next Hearing Date: 03-01-2022
    
    Date: 03-01-2022
    Business: Adv. Mr. Rajesh Singh for plaintiff is present and filed vakalatnama. It is marked at Exh. 06.
    Adv. Mr. Khandagale for defendant/MCGM is present.
    Adv. for the plaintiff filed application for extension of interim protection. It is marked at Exh. 07.
    O-Other side to say. Say filed by defendant.
    Heard both the sides.
    Already sufficient opportunities have been granted to the plaintiff to secure suitable orders from the Hon\''ble Appellate Court. However, he could not do so during the given time. Today, he is again seeking protection for earlier order. In the circumstances, strictly as a last chance, the defendant is restrained to proceed against the suit structure within the period of seven days from today itself. In the meantime, the plaintiff is directed to do the needful, with the note that no further extension would be granted by this Court.
    The plaintiff is directed to serve the authenticated copy of roznama on the concerned Officer of the defendant and ensure that it is duly communicated to the said Office.
    Authenticated copy of roznama given to be both parties.
    With the consent of the both parties, the matter is adjourned on 14.01.2022.
    Adjourned for NM reply to 14.01.2022.
    Next Purpose: NM REPLYREJOINDER
    Next Hearing Date: 14-01-2022
    
    Date: 14-01-2022
    Business: Adv. Mr. Rajesh Singh for plaintiff is present.
    Adv. Mr. Khandagale for defendant/MCGM is present.
    Advocate for the plaintiff submitted that in view of AO No. 16/2022 in IA No. 111/2022, the Hon\''ble High Court granted stayed till 09.02.2022 and posted the matter for reply.
    Adjourned for NM reply to 09.03.2022.
    Next Purpose: NM REPLYREJOINDER
    Next Hearing Date: 09-03-2022
    
    Date: 09-03-2022
    Business: Adv. Mr. Rajesh Singh for plaintiff is present.
    Adv. Ms. J.V. Mhatre h/f Adv. Khandagale for defendant/MCGM is present and orally requested for time to file NM reply. Granted .
    Adjourned for NM reply and WS to 10.06.2022.
    Next Purpose: NM REPLYREJOINDER
    Next Hearing Date: 10-06-2022
    
    Date: 10-06-2022
    Business: Adv. Mr. Singh for the  plaintiff is present.
    Adv. Mr. Khandagale for defendant/MCGM is present and orally requested for time to file NM reply. Granted.
    Adjourned for NM reply and WS to 22.08.2022.
    Next Purpose: NM REPLYREJOINDER
    Next Hearing Date: 22-08-2022
    
    Date: 22-08-2022
    Business: None present for plaintiff.
    Adv. Mr. Khandagale for defendant/MCGM is present and orally requested for time to file NM reply. Time is granted.
    Adjourned for NM reply and WS to 12.10.2022.
    Next Purpose: NM REPLYREJOINDER
    Next Hearing Date: 12-10-2022
    
    Date: 12-10-2022
    Next Purpose: NM REPLYREJOINDER
    Next Hearing Date: 14-12-2022
    
    Date: 14-12-2022
    Business: Adv. Mr. Makhija h/f Adv. Rajesh Singh for the plaintiff is present.
    Adv. Mr. Khandagale for defendant/MCGM is present and orally requested for time to file NM reply. Time is granted.
    Adjourned for NM reply and WS to 22.02.2023.
    Next Purpose: NM REPLYREJOINDER
    Next Hearing Date: 22-02-2023
    
    Date: 22-02-2023
    Business: Adv. Mr. Ranjan Mishra h/f Adv. Rajesh Singh  for the plaintiff is present.
    Adv. Mrs. S.G. Chavan h/f Adv. Khandagale for defendant/MCGM is present and requested for time to file NM reply. Time is granted.
    Adjourned for NM reply and WS to 06.05.2023.
    Next Purpose: NM REPLYREJOINDER
    Next Hearing Date: 06-05-2023
    
    Date: 06-05-2023
    Business: Adv. Mr. Iftikar Sayyed h/f Adv. Rajesh Singh for the plaintiff is present.
    Adv. Mrs. S.S. Chavan h/f Adv. Giri for defendant/MCGM is present and requested for time to file NM reply. Time is granted.
    Adjourned for NM reply and WS to 14.07.2023.
    Next Purpose: NM REPLYREJOINDER
    Next Hearing Date: 14-07-2023
    
    Date: 14-07-2023
    Business: Adv. Mr. Makhija h/f Mr. Rahul Singh for the plaintiff is present.
    Adv. Mr. G.O. Giri for defendant/MCGM is present and requested for time to NM reply/WS. Time is granted.
    Adjourned for NM reply/WS to 18.09.2023.
    Next Purpose: NM REPLYREJOINDER
    Next Hearing Date: 18-09-2023
    
    Date: 18-09-2023
    Business: None present for the plaintiff.
    Adv. Mr. Khandagale h/f Adv. Mr. Giri for defendant/MCGM is present and requested time to file NM reply/WS. Time is granted.
    Adjourned for NM reply/WS to 29.11.2023.
    Next Purpose: NM REPLYREJOINDER
    Next Hearing Date: 29-11-2023
    
    Date: 29-11-2023
    Business: Adv. Ms. Sarita Choudhari h/f Adv. Rajesh Singh for the plaintiff is present.
    Adv. Mr. G.O. Giri for defendant/MCGM is present and requested time to file NM reply/WS. Time is granted.
    Adjourned for NM reply/WS to 29.01.2024.
    Next Purpose: NM REPLYREJOINDER
    Next Hearing Date: 29-01-2024
    
    Date: 29-01-2024
    Business: Adv. Mr. Iftekhar Sayed h/f Adv. Rajesh Singh for the plaintiff is present.
    Adv. Mr. G.O. Giri for defendant/MCGM is present and sought time to file NM reply/WS. Time is granted.
    Adjourned for NM reply/WS to 03.04.2024.
    Next Purpose: NM REPLYREJOINDER
    Next Hearing Date: 03-04-2024
    
    Date: 03-04-2024
    Business: Adv. Mrs. Sarita Chaudhari for the plaintiff is present.
    Adv. Mr. G.O. Giri for defendant/MCGM is present and sought time to file NM reply/WS. Time is granted.
    Adjourned for NM reply/WS to 26.06.2024.
    Next Purpose: NM REPLYREJOINDER
    Next Hearing Date: 26-06-2024
    
    Date: 26-06-2024
    Business: Adv. Mr. Ranjan Mishra h/f Adv. Mr. Rajesh Singh for the plaintiff is present.
    Adv. Mr. Arvind Rathod for defendant/ MCGM is present and sought time to file WS. Time is granted.
    Adjourned for WS to 19.08.2024.
    Next Purpose: WRITTEN STATEMENT
    Next Hearing Date: 19-08-2024
    
    Date: 19-08-2024
    Business: Court is on leave.
    Next Purpose: WRITTEN STATEMENT
    Next Hearing Date: 16-10-2024
    
    Date: 16-10-2024
    Business: Adv. Mr. Rajesh Singh for the plaintiff is present and informed that the appeal, filed against Order of this Court, is pending before the Honble High Court. Adv. Mr. Botlawar a/w Adv. Mr. V.G. Shinde for defendant/MCGM is present and filed pursis for treating NM reply as WS. Taken on record. It is marked as Exhibit 8. O- Filed. The NM reply is treated as WS. It is already marked as Exhibit 2. O- Filed.
    Adjourned for NM hearing/draft issues to 13.12.2024.
    Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
    Next Hearing Date: 13-12-2024
    
    Date: 13-12-2024
    Business: Adv. Mr. Rahul Singh for the plaintiff is present and sought time to proceed with the matter, as the proceeding is pending before the Honble High Court. Time is granted. Adv. Mr. V.G. Shinde for defendant/MCGM is present.
    Adjourned for NM hearing/draft issues to 12.02.2025.
    Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
    Next Hearing Date: 12-02-2025
    
    Date: 12-02-2025
    Business: court is on leave
    Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
    Next Hearing Date: 02-04-2025
    
    Date: 02-04-2025
    Business: Adv. Ms. Sarita Chaudhari h/f Adv. Mr. Rajesh Singh for the plaintiff is present and submitted that terrace of building wherein office of the advocate which situated is collapsed and therefore she could not prepare written notes of argument. Time is granted. Adv. Mr. V.G. Shinde for defendant/BMC is present.
    Adjourned for NM hearing to 20.06.2025.
    Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
    Next Hearing Date: 20-06-2025
    
    Date: 20-06-2025
    Business: Adv. Mr. Rajesh Singh for the plaintiff is present and submitted that plaintiff had preferred AO in which stay is granted. Hence, matter adjourned. Adv. Mr. Botlawar for defendant/BMC is present.
    Adjourned for NM hearing to 13.08.2025.
    Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
    Next Hearing Date: 13-08-2025
    
    Date: 13-08-2025
    Business: PO is on leave.
    Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
    Next Hearing Date: 08-10-2025
    
    Date: 08-10-2025
    Business: PO is on leave.
    Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
    Next Hearing Date: 01-12-2025
    
    Date: 01-12-2025
    Business: Adv. Mr. Hitesh Jain for the plaintiff is present and requested time to argue the NM. Time is granted. Adv. Mr. Botlawar a/w Adv. Mr. V.G. Shinde for defendant/BMC is present.
    Adjourned for NM hearing to 09.02.2026.
    Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
    Next Hearing Date: 09-02-2026
    
    Date: 09-02-2026
    Business: None present for the plaintiff to proceed with matter. Adv. Mr. Botlawar for defendant/BMC is present.
    Adjourned for NM hearing to 08.04.2026.
    Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
    Next Hearing Date: 08-04-2026
    
    Date: 08-04-2026
    Business: Adv. Sarita Chaudhari h/f Rajesh Singh and Associates present for the plaintiff and seeking time as a AO no.16/22 is pending before Honble High Court.
    Adv. Mr. Botlawar for defendant/BMC is present.
    Adjourned for NM Hearing to 24.06.2026.
    Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
    Next Hearing Date: 24-06-2026
    
    Date: 24-06-2026
    Business: Adv.  Rahul Singh is present for the plaintiff
    Mr. Botlawar for defendant/BMC is present.
    Earlier order, if any, to continue till next date.
    Adjourned for NM hearing to 01.07.2026.
    Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
    Next Hearing Date: 01-07-2026
    
    Date: 01-07-2026
    Business: Adv. Mr. Rahul Singh for the plaintiff is present and requested time to argue the NM. Specific attention of the Honble High Court direction was given to the concerned advocate they seek time. Time is granted. Adv. Mr. Botlawar for defendant/BMC is present.
    Earlier order, if any, to continue till next date.
    Adjourned for NM hearing to 10.07.2026.
    Next Purpose: S.CT.H.CT. TIME BOUND
    Next Hearing Date: 10-07-2026
    
    Date: 10-07-2026
    Business: Adv. Mr. Saurabh Singh h/f Adv. Mr. Rahul Singh for the plaintiff is present and filed compilation of document in NM. Taken on record. O- Other side to say. He undertook to supply its copy on the next date. Adv. Mr. Botlawar for defendant/BMC is present. Kept back.
    Later on 3.50 p.m.
    The appearance is as above. The advocate for plaintiff seeks time to argue on NM as senior is busy before the Honble High Court. The NM is expedite, hence, time is granted as last chance. Earlier order, if any, to continue till next date.
    Adjourned for NM hearing/compliance to 15.07.2026.
    Next Purpose: S.CT.H.CT. TIME BOUND
    Next Hearing Date: 15-07-2026
    
    Date: 15-07-2026
    Business: Adv. Mr. Rajesh Singh for the plaintiff is present and filed application for adjournment. Taken on record. It is marked as Exhibit 9. O- Allowed.
    Adv. Mr. Botlawar for defendant/BMC is present.
    Earlier order, if any, to continue till next date.
    Adjourned for NM hearing at 12.00 p.m. to 17.07.026.
    Next Purpose: S.CT.H.CT. TIME BOUND
    Next Hearing Date: 17-07-2026
    
    Date: 17-07-2026
    Business: Adv. Mr. Rajesh Singh for the plaintiff is present.
    Adv. Mr. Botlawar for defendant/BMC is present.
    Heard both the sides on NM. Advocate for plaintiff synopsis along-with documents and citations in NM. Taken on record. O- Filed. Copy is supplied to the other side.
    Adjourned for NM order to 22.07.2026.
    Next Purpose: S.CT.H.CT. TIME BOUND
    Next Hearing Date: 22-07-2026
    
    Date: 22-07-2026
    Business: court is on leave, second session hence adjd to
    Next Purpose: S.CT.H.CT. TIME BOUND
    Next Hearing Date: 23-07-2026
    
    Date: 23-07-2026
    Business: Adv. Mr. Rahul Singh  for the plaintiff is present.
    Adv. Mrs. Sheetal Metakari for defendant/BMC is present.
    Adjourned for NM Order to 24.07.2026.
    Next Purpose: S.CT.H.CT. TIME BOUND
    Next Hearing Date: 24-07-2026
    
    Date: 24-07-2026
    Business: Adv. Mr. Saurabh Singh h f adv. Mr. Rajesh singh for the plaintiff is present.
    Adv. Mr. Botlawar for defendant/BMC is present.
     F.R.S.R. Following Order is passed in
    -: O R D E R :-
    	The Notice of Motion no.928 of 2021 is hereby rejected.
       Adjourned for Draft Issue to 19.10.2026.
    Nature Of Disposal: OTHER
    Disposal Date: 24-07-2026

    Additional Case Details

    Additional Case Details
    Filing Number: 103251/2021
    Filing Date: 24-03-2021
    First Hearing Date: 24th March 2021
    Decision Date: 24th July 2026
    Court Number And Judge: 11-COURT 02 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE

    Orders

    3
    Final Order 2Full order available
    24 Jul 2026

    Order Details: Notice of Motion Pdf Text: 1 MHCC010029632021 IN THE BOMBAY CITY CIVIL COURT AT BOMBAY. NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 928 OF 2021 IN L.C. SUIT NO. 664 OF 2021. Mohd. Salim Javed Akhtar Siddiqui. … Plaintiff Versus. The Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai. ...Defendant CORAM : JAYDEO Y. GHULE AD-HOC ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE, CITY CIVIL COURT, COURT ROOM NO. 11. DATED : 24.07.2026 Appearances : Ld. Adv.Mr. Rajesh Singh for the plaintiff. Ld. Adv. Mr. Botlawar for the…

    Read Full Order
    Interim Order 1Full order available
    17 Dec 2021

    Order Details: Other Pdf Text: .1. Notice of Motion No. 928 of 2021 in L.C. Suit No. 664 of 2021. MHCC010029632021 IN THE BOMBAY CITY CIVIL COURT AT BOMBAY. NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 928 OF 2021 IN L.C. SUIT NO. 664 OF 2021. Mohd. Salim Javed Akhtar Siddiqui. …........ … Plaintiff. Versus. Municipal Corporation of Greater, Mumbai. … Defendant. iss CORAM : HIS HONOUR JUDGE SHRI. A.G. SANTANI DATED : 17.12.2021. (C.R.NO.11). Appearances : Shri. S.K. Dubey, Ld. Advocate for…

    Read Full Order
    Order 1Full order available
    17 Dec 2021

    Order Details: Other Pdf Text: .1. Notice of Motion No. 928 of 2021 in L.C. Suit No. 664 of 2021. MHCC010029632021 IN THE BOMBAY CITY CIVIL COURT AT BOMBAY. NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 928 OF 2021 IN L.C. SUIT NO. 664 OF 2021. Mohd. Salim Javed Akhtar Siddiqui. …........ … Plaintiff. Versus. Municipal Corporation of Greater, Mumbai. … Defendant. iss CORAM : HIS HONOUR JUDGE SHRI. A.G. SANTANI DATED : 17.12.2021. (C.R.NO.11). Appearances : Shri. S.K. Dubey, Ld. Advocate for…

    Read Full Order

    TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.