Skip to main content
CHAMBER SUMMONS

Mr. Murthy Tyagrajan Sidh MurthyVsMCGM

CNR MHCC01002943201811-COURT 02 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE
City Civil Court, Mumbai
Mumbai · Maharashtra (MH)
CASE DISPOSED
Uncontested--ALLOWED
Decision Date: 02nd May 2019

TrustJury record updated 10 Sept 2026

Case Overview

Registration Number
100407/2018
Registration Date
27 Feb 2018

Advocates

1

For Petitioner

For Respondent

    Not available

    Parties

    2

    Petitioner

    1. 1Mr. Murthy Tyagrajan Sidh Murthy

    Respondent

    1. 1MCGM

    Acts & Sections

    1
    Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Land (Vidarbha Region and Kutch Area) Act · Sec 9

    Case History / Proceedings

    Case History
    Date: 01-03-2018
Business: As court is busy in dictating judgment. Hence board is discharged.
Matter adjd to 20.03.2018.
Next Purpose: CHAMBER SUMMONS
Next Hearing Date: 20-03-2018

Date: 20-03-2018

Date: 06-04-2018
Business: The court is on leave.
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 14-06-2018

Date: 14-06-2018
Business: Adv Mukesh Dubey for the plaintiff present and filed original ch/sum no.407/18 and original NM no. 807/18 alongwith affidavit t.o.r.
Adv Khandagale for the def/BMC present.
Adjourned to 05.09.2018  for reply.
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 05-09-2018

Date: 05-09-2018
Business: None for Plaintiff.
Advocate Ms. Tondwalkar for BMC present.
Court is busy in hearing HC expedited Notice of Motion in suit no.1528/15 and urgent applications, hence case is adjourned to 19/10/2018.
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 19-10-2018

Date: 19-10-2018
Business: Court is busy in hearing argument on Notice of Motions in suit nos.1406/17, 2215/17 and 1257/18, hence board is discharged and case is adjourned to 29/11/2018.
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 29-11-2018

Date: 29-11-2018
Business: Adv. Mukesh Dubey for Plaintiff present.
Adv. Bansode for respondent present and filed Vakalatnama
Exh. 3 and submitted that Plaintiff may be directed to provide copy of plaint to respondent. Hence Plaintiff is directed to provide the copy of plaint to respondent.
Advocate Ms. Hajare for BMC/Deft present.
Adjourned to 08.02.2019 for compliance i.e. for providing copy of plain to respondent.
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 08-02-2019

Date: 08-02-2019
Reason For Adjournment: court time is over
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 18-04-2019

Date: 18-04-2019
Business: Advocate Mr. S.K.Dubey for plaintiff present.
Advocate Ms. Hajare for defendant/MCGM present.
Advocate Mr. Bansod for respondent present filed reply on Chamber Summons no. 407/18. TOR.
Heard advocates for both the parties.
The case is adjourned to 02.05.2019 for Chamber Summons order.
Next Purpose: CH/S ORDERS
Next Hearing Date: 02-05-2019

Date: 02-05-2019
Business: Advocate Mukesh Dubey for plaintiff present.
Advocate Jyoti Jadhav h/f adv. Bansode for applicant present.
Advocate Ms.Hajare for defendant/MCGM present.
Perused.  Heard.
The plaintiff has taken out this Chamber Summons to add his landlord as defendant No.2 and to add the averments as per the Schedule to plead certain documents proving authorization of the suit structure.
The respondent in the Chamber Summons i.e. the landlord has pleaded in the reply that plaintiff is misguiding the Hon\''ble Court by suppressing material facts and therefore, it be allowed to join the suit.
The Roznama dated 16.2.2018, reveals that my predecessor has rejected the ad-interim relief.  While rejecting the ad-interim relief one of the observations is that the plaintiff has not made the landlord as party defendant.
Considering these circumstances, I pass the following order ORDER
1. Chamber Summons No.407 of 2018 is made absolute in terms of prayer Clause (a) and (b).
2. Plaintiff to carry out the amendment on or before next date.
3. Plaintiff to serve writ of summons to newly added defendant.
Nature Of Disposal: ALLOWED
Disposal Date: 02-05-2019

    Additional Case Details

    Additional Case Details
    Filing Number: 103272/2018
Filing Date: 27-02-2018
First Hearing Date: 01st March 2018
Decision Date: 02nd May 2019
Court Number And Judge: 11-COURT 02 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE

    Orders

    2
    Final Order 1
    02 May 2019
    Order Details: Other
Pdf Text: Advocate Mukesh Dubey for plaintiff present. Advocate Jyoti Jadhav h/f adv. Bansode for applicant
present. Advocate Ms.Hajare for defendant/MCGM present. Perused. Heard. The plaintiff has taken
out this Chamber Summons to add his landlord as defendant No.2 and to add the averments as per
the Schedule to plead certain documents proving authorization of the suit structure. The respondent
in the Chamber Summons i.e. the landlord has pleaded in the reply that plaintiff is misguiding the
Hon&amp#039ble Court by suppressing material facts and therefore, it be allowed to join the
suit. The Roznama dated 16.2.2018, reveals that my predecessor has rejected the ad-interim relief.
While rejecting the ad-interim relief one of the observations is that the plaintiff has not made the
landlord as party defendant. Considering these circumstances, I pass the following order ORDER 1.
Chamber Summons No.407 of 2018 is made absolute in terms of prayer Clause (a) and (b). 2.
Plaintiff to carry out the amendment on or before next date. 3. Plaintiff to serve writ of summons to
newly added defendant.
-- 1 of 1 --
    Order 1
    02 May 2019
    Order Details: Other
Pdf Text: Advocate Mukesh Dubey for plaintiff present. Advocate Jyoti Jadhav h/f adv. Bansode for applicant
present. Advocate Ms.Hajare for defendant/MCGM present. Perused. Heard. The plaintiff has taken
out this Chamber Summons to add his landlord as defendant No.2 and to add the averments as per
the Schedule to plead certain documents proving authorization of the suit structure. The respondent
in the Chamber Summons i.e. the landlord has pleaded in the reply that plaintiff is misguiding the
Hon&amp#039ble Court by suppressing material facts and therefore, it be allowed to join the
suit. The Roznama dated 16.2.2018, reveals that my predecessor has rejected the ad-interim relief.
While rejecting the ad-interim relief one of the observations is that the plaintiff has not made the
landlord as party defendant. Considering these circumstances, I pass the following order ORDER 1.
Chamber Summons No.407 of 2018 is made absolute in terms of prayer Clause (a) and (b). 2.
Plaintiff to carry out the amendment on or before next date. 3. Plaintiff to serve writ of summons to
newly added defendant.
-- 1 of 1 --

    TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.