Skip to main content
NOTICE OF MOTION

Mrs. Kesar Lalji ShahVsMs. Kanchi Manish Shah +1 more

CNR MHCC01002922201928-COURT 28 ADD SESSIONS JUDGE
City Civil Court, Mumbai
Mumbai · Maharashtra (MH)
CASE DISPOSED
Contested--ORDER
Decision Date: 05th October 2019

TrustJury record updated 19 Sept 2026

Case Overview

Registration Number
101125/2019
Registration Date
14 Mar 2019

Advocates

1

For Petitioner

For Respondent

    Not available

    Parties

    3

    Acts & Sections

    1
    Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act · Sec 9

    Case History / Proceedings

    Case History
    Date: 26-03-2019
    Business: Adv for plaintiff Mrs.Yashodha present
    Adv for deft no. 1 and 2 Mr. Sandeep Gupta present
    Adv for plaintiff submitted VP
    Adv for plaintiff tendered original N/M 1125/19 along with affidavit.
    Adv for deft requested for adjournment to file reply to N/M
    O-Adjournment Granted
    Matter is Adjd for Reply to N/M to 13/06/2019
    Next Purpose: REPLY
    Next Hearing Date: 13-06-2019
    
    Date: 13-06-2019
    Business: None for the plaintiff.
    Adv for deft Mr.Narayan present
    Adv for deft. requested for adjournment to filed reply.
    O-Granted.
    Matter is Adjd for Reply to N/M to 02/08/2019
    L.O.
    Adv for plaintiff Ms. Jongale present
    Next Purpose: NM REPLYREJOINDER
    Next Hearing Date: 02-08-2019
    
    Date: 02-08-2019
    Business: Adv Jondhale for plaintiff present.
    Adv P. Naryanan for defendant present.
    Adv for defendant has prayed for time to file reply to NM.
    Already sufficient chance has been given to defendant to file reply.  Therefore, last chance is given to file reply subject to cost of Rs. 1000/- to be paid to plaintiff for delay.
    Adj for reply to NM to 30/09/2019.
    Next Purpose: REPLY
    Next Hearing Date: 05-09-2019
    
    Date: 05-09-2019
    Business: None for plaintiff.
    Adv. Neeta Parikh for defendant present.
    Adv for defendant had submitted that the other side Adv. had consented for todays adjournment and for date 17.09.2019.
    Adjd. to 17.09.2019 for hearing of NM.
    LO
    At 3.00 pm.
    Adv. Parmar for applicant present.
    Applicant present.
    Adv. for applicant told the court that this matter was fixed at at 3.00p.m. and he had never consented for adjournment.Also the defendant had not paid costs of Rs. 1000/-.As the matter was already adjourned and taking into consideration the grievance of the Advocate for applicant. The date is preponed to 11.09.2019. The Adv. for applicant to give private notice to Adv. for defendant about  the preponed date. The service in addition can also be done through Wats app. It should be noted by the parties that on next date there would not be any adjournment simplictor and parties to proceed with this case.
    Next Purpose: REPLY
    Next Hearing Date: 11-09-2019
    
    Date: 11-09-2019
    Business: Adv. Parmar for applicant present.
    CA of plaintiff/ applicant present.
    Service is not complete for preponement of date. Already matter was adjourned to 17.09.2019. This matter is time bound by the Hon\''ble High court. Issue request letter to the Hon\''ble High court for extension of time to dispose of NM 3232/19 and NM 1125/19. Adjd. to original date ie 17.09.2019.
    Next Purpose: REPLY
    Next Hearing Date: 17-09-2019
    
    Date: 17-09-2019
    Business: p.o. is on leave adjd to 26/9/19
    Next Purpose: REPLY
    Next Hearing Date: 26-09-2019
    
    Date: 26-09-2019
    Business: Applicant/CA present.
    Adv. Parmar for applicant present.
    Adv. Jiten Bhagwat for plaintiff present.
    Adv. Vivek Upadhyay for deft present.
    Reply to NM 3232/19 filed by adv. for deft. t.o.r.
    Copy supplied to applicant.
    Reply to nm 1125/19 filed by adv. for deft. t.o.r
    Copy supplied to adv. for plaintiff.
    Cost of Rs. 1000/- paid by Cheque no. 818513. Cheque handed over to adv. for plaintiff.
    Adjd. for nm hearing to 01.10.2019 at 11.00 a.m.
    Next Purpose: NM  ARGUMENTS
    Next Hearing Date: 01-10-2019
    
    Date: 01-10-2019
    Business: CA of plaintiff present. Adv. absent.
    Adv. Parmar for applicant in NM 3232/19.
    Deft present. Adv. Parekh for deft. Present.
    Heard on NM 3232/19
    KB for order on NM 1125/19
    LO
    At 1.30 p.m.
    Adv. Jiten Bhardwaj for  plaintiff present.
    Ld adv. has prayed for adjournment to argue nm no. 1125/19. This oral application is objected strongly by the adv. for deft as the deft was made to pay cost of Rs. 1000/- for delay. As today due to personal difficulty of adv . for plaintiff the matter is adjourned. Therefore, cost of Rs. 500/- to be paid to DLSA, Mumbai.
    Matter is adjd. to 03.10.2019 for further argument at 12.30 p.m.
    Next Purpose: NM  ARGUMENTS
    Next Hearing Date: 03-10-2019
    
    Date: 03-10-2019
    Business: CA of plaintiff present. Adv. absent.
    Adv. Parmar for applicant in NM 3232/19.
    Deft present. Adv. Parekh for deft. Present.
    Adv. Jiten Bhardwaj for  plaintiff present.
    Exh. 13  - V/p filed by adv. for plaintiff. t.o.r.
    Heard both sides on NM 1125/19.
    Adjd. to 05.10.2019 for order on nm 1125/19 and 3232/19 .
    Next Purpose: ORDER
    Next Hearing Date: 05-10-2019
    
    Date: 05-10-2019
    Business: F.R.S.R. following order
    1.Notice of Motion No.1125/2019 stands rejected with cost.
    2.Notice of Motion No.1125/2019 stands disposed of accordingly.
    Nature Of Disposal: ORDER
    Disposal Date: 05-10-2019

    Additional Case Details

    Additional Case Details
    Filing Number: 103176/2019
    Filing Date: 14-03-2019
    First Hearing Date: 26th March 2019
    Decision Date: 05th October 2019
    Court Number And Judge: 28-COURT 28 ADD SESSIONS JUDGE

    Orders

    1
    Final Order 1Full order available
    05 Oct 2019

    Order Details: Notice of Motion Pdf Text: NM 1125/19 SUM.SUIT 435/2018 1 IN THE BOMBAY CITY CIVIL COURT AT MUMBAI NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1125 OF 2019 (CNR NO.: MHCC010029222019) IN SUMMARY SUIT NO. 435 OF 2018 Kesar Lalji Shah, ...Plaintiff Versus Kanchi Manish Shah and anr. ...Defendants Appearances: Advocate Jiten Bhardwaj for the Plaintiff. Advocate Neeta V. Parikh for the Defendant. CORAM : HIS HONOUR JUDGE SHRI.M.S.LONE (C.R.NO.28) DATE : 05th OCTOBER 2019 ORDER This Notice of motion is to…

    Read Full Order

    TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.