SUIT - SHORT CAUSE CIVIL SUIT
Luizinaha Nunes of Mumbai w/o. late aloysius Nunes +6 moreVsLawrie Hermangild Nunes +1 more
CNR MHCC01002916201862-COURT 62 AD-HOC ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE
City Civil Court, Mumbai
Mumbai · Maharashtra (MH)
PENDING
TrustJury record updated 10 Sept 2026
Case Overview
- Registration Number
- 100657/2018
- Registration Date
- 05 Mar 2018
- Next Hearing Date
- 05 Oct 2026
- Case Stage
- DRAFT ISSUES
Advocates
1For Petitioner
For Respondent
Not available
Parties
9Acts & Sections
1Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Land (Vidarbha Region and Kutch Area) Act · Sec 39
Case History / Proceedings
Case History
Date: 26-03-2018
Business: Adv. Fernandes for pltff present.
None for deft.
Adjd for direction on 10.07.18.
Next Purpose: NM REPLYREJOINDER
Next Hearing Date: 20-04-2018
Date: 20-04-2018
Business: By precipe.
Adv. Sonawane for pltff present.
Adv. Parte H/f Adv. Prabhawalkar for D-2 present and filed V.P. for D-2. TOR and marked as Exh.2.
He also filed WS on behalf of D-2. TOR and marked as Exh.3. Copy of Exh.3 served to other side.
LC for plaintiff filed draft NM with supporting affidavit. TOR. Leave granted to register. Copy served to other side.
Now adjd for reply on draft NM taken out by plaintiff on 25.04.18 as per conveniency of both the sides.
Next Purpose: NM REPLYREJOINDER
Next Hearing Date: 25-04-2018
Date: 25-04-2018
Business: Adv. Fernandes for pltff present and tendered registered NM No.1154/18 alongwith affidavit in support. TOR.
He also filed registered NM 1680/18. TOR.
Adv. N.S. Parte H/f Adv. Prabhawalkar for D-2 present and filed reply to NM 1680/18. TOR.
Adjd for hearing on NM on 05.06.18.
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 05-06-2018
Date: 05-06-2018
Business: Adv. Mr. Fernandes for pltff present.
None present for deft no. 1.
Adv. Mr. Prabhavalkar for Deft no. 2 present.
Rejoinder to reply of deft no. 2 to contempt N/M taken out by the plaintiff tendered by the plaintiff. t.o.r.
adv for the plff has submitted that reply to N/M no. 1154/18 is served upon him by defendant no. 1 and he is ready with rejoinder today, but it appears that deft no. 1 has not filed reply to N/M no 1154/18.
Matter adjd to 10.07.2018 for contempt N/M hearing/ reply to N/M no. 1154/18 by defendant no. 1 and 2/ passing no w.st order against deft no. 1.
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 10-07-2018
Date: 10-07-2018
Business: Court is on leave
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 27-07-2018
Date: 27-07-2018
Business: None present for the plff.
Adv. Mr. Prabhavalkar for Defendant no. 2 present.
Reply to N/M tendered by deft no. 2. t.o.r.
Matter is adjd. to 3.09.2018 for N/M hearing.
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 03-09-2018
Date: 03-09-2018
Business: Adv. Ms. Sonawane for the Plaintiff present.
Adv. Mr. N. S. Parte for Defendant no. 2 present.
Deft no. 1 has failed to file reply and W.S. Hence no reply and no written statement order is hereby passed against deft no. 1.
Adv for the plaintiff seeks adjournment. Granted.
Matter is adjd. to 2.11.2018 for N/M no.1154/18 hearing/ contempt N/M hearing.
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 02-11-2018
Date: 02-11-2018
Business: Adv. Denzil D\''Mello for the Plaintiff present.
Adv. Sabnis for Defendant No.2 present.
deft no.1 present. (Without W/st)
Adv for Deft no.2 He seeks adjournment. Granted.
Matter is adjd. to 15.01.2019for Contempt N/M Hearing
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 15-01-2019
Date: 15-01-2019
Business: The court is busy in dictating Judgment in SU no. 9173/92 and other matters on board. Hence board is discharged.
Matter is adjd. to 28.02.2019.
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 28-02-2019
Date: 28-02-2019
Business: Resumed.
Adv. Fernandes for plaintiff and Adv. Chimalkar for defendant no. 2 are present. None for remaining defendants.
Adv. Fernandes filed affidavit in rejoinder to NM. Copy served on def. no.2.
Adjd for reply of def. no. 1/arguments on NM to 25.04.2019.
Next Purpose: NM ARGUMENTS
Next Hearing Date: 25-04-2019
Date: 25-04-2019
Business: Advocate Mr. D\''Mello for Plaintiff present
Advocate Mr. Valvekar for Defendant no.1 present
Advocate Mr. Parte for Defendant no.2 present
ORDER BELOW EXH.1
Perused record of the case. It is noticed that contempt NM No.1680/2018 taken out by Plaintiff and it is pending in this suit. As the contempt NM is pending, it becomes necessary to refer here case between Rampyaribai Wd/o of Sukhdev Daga and others Vs Niladevi, Wd/o of Narayandas Jakhotiya and others reported in 2007 (4) MHLJ at page 213. In said case, Hon\''ble High Court is pleased to observe that,
Having heard the learned Counsel for the rival parties and having given my anxious thought in the matter, I find that the proceedings under Order 39, Rule 2A of the Civil Procedure Code are absolutely independent proceedings. Whether there was breach of injunction or not is a question to be decided upon evidence and the said question has no relevance with the issues in the suit which are to be decided on merits of the suit. The eventuality of breach of injunction has occurred not at the time of filing of the suit but subsequent to the filing of the suit. The issues framed in the suit on merits of the suit cannot be mixed up with the trial of the application (Ex. 37) for breach of injunction. The question whether the petitioner would be prejudiced or not is not relevant. What is relevant is the practice and procedure that is required to be adopted while deciding the suit and the application for breach of injunction. As a matter of fact, in my opinion, the application for breach of injunction should be separately registered as Misc. Judicial case and should be tried by framing appropriate issues. Thus, the proceedings for breach of injunction has absolutely nothing to do with the decision of the suit on merits. I fail to understand as to why the proceedings under Order 39, Rule 2A of Civil Procedure Code are not separately registered and separately tried by the learned trial Court.
On perusal of the record it is noticed that contempt NM is separately registered as NM No.1680/2018. In such circumstances in view of observations of Hon\''ble High Court in the case cited Supra it becomes clear that contempt NM can be heard and decided separately. Hence, for settlement of issues in respect of NM No.1680/2018, parties are directed to file draft issues in the matter thereafter, issues will be settled by the Court and as directed by Hon\''ble High Court, separate evidence will be recorded for decision of contempt NM No.1680/2018 and said NM will be decided on merits as per the evidence adduced in said NM, hence I proceed to pass following order -
ORDER
NM no.1680/2018 will be decided separately for that purpose, parties are directed to file draft issues in respect of NM No.1680/2018.
Advocate for Defendant no.2 submitted that matter may be adjourned for argument of NM no.1154/18. Considering submissions adjourned.
Case is adjourned to 19/07/2019 for NM hearing and for filing draft issues by parties in respect of NM no.1680/18.
Next Purpose: NM ARGUMENTS
Next Hearing Date: 19-07-2019
Date: 25-04-2019
Business: Advocate Mr. D\''Mello for Plaintiff present
Advocate Mr. Valvekar for Defendant no.1 present
Advocate Mr. Parte for Defendant no.2 present
ORDER BELOW EXH.1
Perused record of the case. It is noticed that contempt NM No.1680/2018 taken out by Plaintiff and it is pending in this suit. As the contempt NM is pending, it becomes necessary to refer here case between Rampyaribai Wd/o of Sukhdev Daga and others Vs Niladevi, Wd/o of Narayandas Jakhotiya and others reported in 2007 (4) MHLJ at page 213. In said case, Hon\''ble High Court is pleased to observe that,
Having heard the learned Counsel for the rival parties and having given my anxious thought in the matter, I find that the proceedings under Order 39, Rule 2A of the Civil Procedure Code are absolutely independent proceedings. Whether there was breach of injunction or not is a question to be decided upon evidence and the said question has no relevance with the issues in the suit which are to be decided on merits of the suit. The eventuality of breach of injunction has occurred not at the time of filing of the suit but subsequent to the filing of the suit. The issues framed in the suit on merits of the suit cannot be mixed up with the trial of the application (Ex. 37) for breach of injunction. The question whether the petitioner would be prejudiced or not is not relevant. What is relevant is the practice and procedure that is required to be adopted while deciding the suit and the application for breach of injunction. As a matter of fact, in my opinion, the application for breach of injunction should be separately registered as Misc. Judicial case and should be tried by framing appropriate issues. Thus, the proceedings for breach of injunction has absolutely nothing to do with the decision of the suit on merits. I fail to understand as to why the proceedings under Order 39, Rule 2A of Civil Procedure Code are not separately registered and separately tried by the learned trial Court.
On perusal of the record it is noticed that contempt NM is separately registered as NM No.1680/2018. In such circumstances in view of observations of Hon\''ble High Court in the case cited Supra it becomes clear that contempt NM can be heard and decided separately. Hence, for settlement of issues in respect of NM No.1680/2018, parties are directed to file draft issues in the matter thereafter, issues will be settled by the Court and as directed by Hon\''ble High Court, separate evidence will be recorded for decision of contempt NM No.1680/2018 and said NM will be decided on merits as per the evidence adduced in said NM, hence I proceed to pass following order -
ORDER
NM no.1680/2018 will be decided separately for that purpose, parties are directed to file draft issues in respect of NM No.1680/2018.
Advocate for Defendant no.2 submitted that matter may be adjourned for argument of NM no.1154/18. Considering submissions adjourned.
Case is adjourned to 19/07/2019 for NM hearing and for filing draft issues by parties in respect of NM no.1680/18.
Next Purpose: NM ARGUMENTS
Next Hearing Date: 19-07-2019
Date: 25-04-2019
Business: Advocate Mr. D\''Mello for Plaintiff present
Advocate Mr. Valvekar for Defendant no.1 present
Advocate Mr. Parte for Defendant no.2 present
ORDER BELOW EXH.1
Perused record of the case. It is noticed that contempt NM No.1680/2018 taken out by Plaintiff and it is pending in this suit. As the contempt NM is pending, it becomes necessary to refer here case between Rampyaribai Wd/o of Sukhdev Daga and others Vs Niladevi, Wd/o of Narayandas Jakhotiya and others reported in 2007 (4) MHLJ at page 213. In said case, Hon\''ble High Court is pleased to observe that,
Having heard the learned Counsel for the rival parties and having given my anxious thought in the matter, I find that the proceedings under Order 39, Rule 2A of the Civil Procedure Code are absolutely independent proceedings. Whether there was breach of injunction or not is a question to be decided upon evidence and the said question has no relevance with the issues in the suit which are to be decided on merits of the suit. The eventuality of breach of injunction has occurred not at the time of filing of the suit but subsequent to the filing of the suit. The issues framed in the suit on merits of the suit cannot be mixed up with the trial of the application (Ex. 37) for breach of injunction. The question whether the petitioner would be prejudiced or not is not relevant. What is relevant is the practice and procedure that is required to be adopted while deciding the suit and the application for breach of injunction. As a matter of fact, in my opinion, the application for breach of injunction should be separately registered as Misc. Judicial case and should be tried by framing appropriate issues. Thus, the proceedings for breach of injunction has absolutely nothing to do with the decision of the suit on merits. I fail to understand as to why the proceedings under Order 39, Rule 2A of Civil Procedure Code are not separately registered and separately tried by the learned trial Court.
On perusal of the record it is noticed that contempt NM is separately registered as NM No.1680/2018. In such circumstances in view of observations of Hon\''ble High Court in the case cited Supra it becomes clear that contempt NM can be heard and decided separately. Hence, for settlement of issues in respect of NM No.1680/2018, parties are directed to file draft issues in the matter thereafter, issues will be settled by the Court and as directed by Hon\''ble High Court, separate evidence will be recorded for decision of contempt NM No.1680/2018 and said NM will be decided on merits as per the evidence adduced in said NM, hence I proceed to pass following order -
ORDER
NM no.1680/2018 will be decided separately for that purpose, parties are directed to file draft issues in respect of NM No.1680/2018.
Advocate for Defendant no.2 submitted that matter may be adjourned for argument of NM no.1154/18. Considering submissions adjourned.
Case is adjourned to 19/07/2019 for NM hearing and for filing draft issues by parties in respect of NM no.1680/18.
Next Purpose: NM ARGUMENTS
Next Hearing Date: 19-07-2019
Date: 19-07-2019
Business: Court is busy in hearing NM in suit no.234/19 and court has to dictate order in suit no.6072/06, case is adjourned to 22/10/2019.
Next Purpose: NM ARGUMENTS
Next Hearing Date: 22-10-2019
Date: 22-10-2019
Business: Advocate Geeta Sonavne for Plaintiff present
Advocate Sabnis for Defendant no.2 present and submitted that on next date his senior advocate will argue NM. Considering submissions adjourned.
Case is adjourned to 15/01/2020 for NM hearing.
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 15-01-2020
Date: 15-01-2020
Business: Advocate Ms. Shrushti Thorat for Plaintiff present and filed rejoinder to Notice of Motion, t.o.r.
Advocate Ms. Sukruta Chimankar for Defendant no.2 present.
Case is adjourned to 03/04/2020 for NM for hearing.
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 03-03-2020
Date: 15-01-2020
Business: Advocate Ms. Shrushti Thorat for Plaintiff present and filed rejoinder to Notice of Motion, t.o.r.
Advocate Ms. Sukruta Chimankar for Defendant no.2 present.
Case is adjourned to 03/04/2020 for NM for hearing.
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 03-04-2020
Date: 15-01-2020
Business: Advocate Ms. Shrushti Thorat for Plaintiff present and filed rejoinder to Notice of Motion, t.o.r.
Advocate Ms. Sukruta Chimankar for Defendant no.2 present.
Case is adjourned to 03/04/2020 for NM for hearing.
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 03-04-2020
Date: 03-04-2020
Reason For Adjournment: National Lock Down
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 17-04-2020
Date: 03-04-2020
Reason For Adjournment: National Lock Down
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 17-04-2020
Date: 17-04-2020
Business: National Lock down
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 28-05-2020
Date: 17-04-2020
Business: National Lock down
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 28-05-2020
Date: 17-04-2020
Business: National Lock down
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 28-05-2020
Date: 28-05-2020
Reason For Adjournment: National Lock Down
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 15-06-2020
Date: 28-05-2020
Reason For Adjournment: National Lock Down
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 15-06-2020
Date: 28-05-2020
Reason For Adjournment: National Lock Down
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 15-06-2020
Date: 15-06-2020
Business: Due to lockdown case is adjd. to 10.08.2020
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 10-08-2020
Date: 15-06-2020
Business: Due to lockdown case is adjd. to 10.08.2020
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 10-08-2020
Date: 10-08-2020
Business: Adjourned due to covid-19.
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 21-09-2020
Date: 21-09-2020
Business: None present for plaintiff.
None present for Defendant.
Due to Corona it seems no parties turn to the court hence adjd. to 14/12/2020.
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 14-12-2020
Date: 14-12-2020
Business: court is on Leave.
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 24-02-2021
Date: 24-02-2021
Business: Adv Mr. Fernandes for plff present and filed draft issues in NM No.1680/2018 as per previous order.
Defendant No.2 present in person and seeks adjournment.
By consent, matter is adjd.for NM hearing to 16.04.2021.
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 16-04-2021
Date: 16-04-2021
Reason For Adjournment: Adjourned due to Covid-19
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 06-07-2021
Date: 16-04-2021
Reason For Adjournment: Adjourned due to Covid-19
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 06-07-2021
Date: 06-07-2021
Reason For Adjournment: Adjourned due to Covid-19
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 26-08-2021
Date: 06-07-2021
Reason For Adjournment: Adjourned due to Covid-19
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 26-08-2021
Date: 06-07-2021
Reason For Adjournment: Adjourned due to Covid-19
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 26-08-2021
Date: 26-08-2021
Business: Adv Mr. Fernandes for plff present.
Adv Mr. Sabnis for deft No.2 present and filed adjournment application Call say of plff. Say filed by adv. for plff as “ I consent”.
Order- Matter is time bound as per directions of Hon’ble High Court and said fact is brought to the notice of the Court today. Ld.Adv for the plff also seeks time hence, granted till 31.08.2021 is granted to protect of interest of justice.
Matter is adjd. for NM hearing to 31.08.2021.
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 31-08-2021
Date: 31-08-2021
Business: Adv Mr. Fernandes for plff present.
Adv. Mr. Anushk Sabnis h/f Adv Mr. S.B. Prabhavalkar for deft No.2 present requested to keep back the matter.
K.B.
L.O. at 4.20 p.m.
Adv Mr. Fernandes for plff present.
Adv.Mr. S.B. Prabhavalkar for deft No.2 present.
After hearing the argument for some time, ld. Advocate for the plff submitted that plff wants to produce certain more documents in support of NM No.1154/2018. Ld. Advocate for deft No.2 submitted that if plff wants to file any new material, it is necessary to give opportunity to deft No.2 to deal with it. I do agree with his argument.
By consent, matter is adjd. for production of additional documents if any by the pflf and for additional affidavit if any by deft No.2 in NM No.1154/2018 and for further NM hearing to 07.09.2021 at 3.30 p.m.
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 07-09-2021
Date: 07-09-2021
Business: None present for plff.
Adv Mr. S.D. Prabhawalkar for deft No.2 present.
K.B.
L.O. at 4.15 p.m.
Adv Mr. Fernandes for plff present and filed additional affidavit of plff No.3 in support of NM No.1154/2018. Copy already given to the adv. for deft No.2.
Adv Mr. S.D. Prabhawalkar for deft No.2 present and filed additional affidavit of deft No.2 in NM No.1154/2018 in view of filing additional reply by the plff No.3 today.
During arguments in NM No.1154/2018, ld. Advocate for the plff made a reference to the rejoinder filed by the plaintiff to the reply filed by deft No.1. Perusal of the record shows that order to proceed with the suit without WS and with the NM without reply is already passed against deft No.1 on 03.09.2018. Ld. Advocates for plff and deft No.2 submitted that deft No.1 has served the copies of his reply on both of them. Adv. for plff requested to grant adjournment by submitting that he will serve a notice on deft No.1 for next date for filing his said reply on record of the Court. As mentioned earlier, order is already passed to proceed with the N.M. without reply of deft No.1 however, since both the contesting parties want that reply of deft No.1 to NM No.1154/2018 would be material for considering the said NM, by consent, matter is adjd. for further NM hearing with liberty to the advocate for the plff to serve notice on deft No.1 as is requested by him.
By consent, matter is adjd. for further argument to 18.09.2021 at 2.45 p.m.
Next Purpose: S.CT.H.CT. TIME BOUND
Next Hearing Date: 18-09-2021
Date: 18-09-2021
Business: Adv Mr. Fernandes for plff present.
Deft No.2 present. Adv.for deft No.1 absent.
Adv Mr. Rahul Walwekar for deft No.1 present and filed vakalatnama on behalf of deft No.1. He also filed affidavit in reply of deft No.1 dt.19.04.2018 in N.M.No.1154/2018. Adv. for the plff has no objection to take said reply on record as copy of said reply is already served previously on the plff and deft No.2.
K.B.
L.O. at 3.00 p.m.
Adv Mr. Fernandes for plff present.
Adv Mr. Rahul Walwekar for deft No.1 present.
Deft No.2 present with Adv Mr. S.D. Prabhawalkar for deft.
Ld. advocates for the parties submitted matter may be adjourned to next date as parties may make attempts to settle the matter out of Court. In view of those statements, to protect the interest of justice, further argument in the NM is adjourned till next date.
By consent, matter is adjd. for settlement/further NM hearing to 12.10.2021.
Next Purpose: S.CT.H.CT. TIME BOUND
Next Hearing Date: 12-10-2021
Date: 12-10-2021
Business: Adv Mr. D’mello present for plff.
Adv Mr. Rahul Walwekar present for deft.No.1.
Adv Mr. Prabhawalkar present for deft No.2.
K.B.
L.O.at 3.45 p.m
Same appearance as above.
Heard arguments of advocates for plff and deft No.1 in N.M.No. 1680/2018.
Adv. for deft No.2 requested to keep the matter for his argument on next date.
On request of adv. for deft No.2, matter is adjd. for argument of deft No.2 in N.M.No.1680/2018 to 14.10.2021 at 3.00 p.m.
Next Purpose: S.CT.H.CT. TIME BOUND
Next Hearing Date: 14-10-2021
Date: 14-10-2021
Business: Adv Mr. D’mello present for plff.
Son of Deft No.1 present in person.
Adv Mr. Prabhawalkar present for deft No.2.
Adv. for plff and deft No.2 brought to the notice that it is incorrectly mentioned in roznama of previous date that argument in N.M.No.1680/2018 is heard and in fact, the argument in NM. No.1154/2018 is in progress.
As it is accidental mistake in the roznama of previous date, N.M.No.1680/2018 appearing in last roznama is replaced by N.M.No.1154/2018 for maintaining the record properly.
Heard argument partly of adv. for deft No.2 in N.M.No.1154/2018.
By consent, matter is adjd. for argument of deft No.2 in N.M.No.1154/2018 to 21.10.2021 at 3.30 p.m.
Next Purpose: S.CT.H.CT. TIME BOUND
Next Hearing Date: 21-10-2021
Date: 21-10-2021
Business: Adv Mr. Prabhawalkar for deft No.2 present and mentioned the matter in the morning session. He seeks adjournment by submitting that he will not be in a position to attend this Court in the afternoon session due to his eye problem.
Matter is on the board of afternoon session hence, kept back
L.O. at 4.00 p.m.
Holding Adv. for deft No.2 present.
None present for plff and deft No.1.
On request made by adv. for deft No.2 in the morning session, matter is adjd. for further NM hearing to 28.10.2021. at 4.00 p.m.
Next Purpose: S.CT.H.CT. TIME BOUND
Next Hearing Date: 28-10-2021
Date: 28-10-2021
Business: Adv Mr. D’mello for plff present.
Adv Mr. Prabhawalkar for deft No.2 present.
None present for deft No.1
By consent, Matter is adjd. for further NM argument to 15.11.2021.
Next Purpose: S.CT.H.CT. TIME BOUND
Next Hearing Date: 15-11-2021
Date: 15-11-2021
Business: Adv Mr. D’mello present for plff.
Adv Mr. Prabhawalkar present for deft.No.2.
Heard further argument of adv for deft No.2 and rejoinder argument of adv. for the plffs in N.M.No. 1154/2018.
Matter is adjd. for order in N.M.No.1154/2018 and hearing in NM No.1680/2018 to 22.11.2021.
Next Purpose: S.CT.H.CT. TIME BOUND
Next Hearing Date: 22-11-2021
Date: 22-11-2021
Business: None present for both parties.
K.B.
L.O. at 5.30 p.m.
Adv Mr.Fernandes for plffs present.
Deft No.1 and deft No.2 are present in person. Their advocates absent.
F.R.S.R. followin order is passed in N.M.No.1154/2018
ORDER
Notice of Motion No.1154/2018 is allowed in terms of its prayer clauses “a” and “b”.
------
Matter is adjd. for evidence in contempt N.M.No.1680/2018 to 10.01.2022.
authenticated copy of this roznama be given to both the parties as per rules.
Next Purpose: S.CT.H.CT. TIME BOUND
Next Hearing Date: 10-01-2022
Date: 10-01-2022
Business: None present for the plff.
Adv. Sukruta A. Chimalkar i/b. S.B. Prabhuvalkar for defendant No.2 present.
Considering the present Pandemic condition and SOP issued by Hon’ble High Court, matter adjourned for evidence in contempt NM to 01.03.2022.
Judge
Next Purpose: S.CT.H.CT. TIME BOUND
Next Hearing Date: 01-03-2022
Date: 01-03-2022
Business: None present for both parties.
K.B.
L.O.at 4.25 p.m.
Adv. Geeta Sonawne for plff present and filed additional affidavit in contempt NM No.1680/2018.
She also filed affidavit in liue of examination in chief in Contempt NM No.1680/2018 of Plff No.3.
Witness not present hence, put up for next date.
She also filed 18 documents with list in contempt NM No.1680/2018.
Matter is adjd. for recording evidence in contempt NM to 01.04.2022.
Next Purpose: RECORDING EVIDENCE
Next Hearing Date: 01-04-2022
Date: 01-04-2022
Business: Adv Mr. Fernandes present for plff. and seeks adjournment for filing evidence in Contempt NM.
None present for deft No.1.
Adv Raj Gupta h/f Adv Khobragade present for deft.No.2 and filed vakalatnama on behalf of deft No.2 at Exh.4.
On request of adv for plff, matter is adjd. for evidence in contempt NM to 20.06.2022.
Next Purpose: RECORDING EVIDENCE
Next Hearing Date: 20-06-2022
Date: 20-06-2022
Business: Plaintiff No.3 present.
Adv.Mr.Ostin Fernandis for plaintiff present.
KB
LO at 12.45 pm
Same appearance.
NM No.1680/2018 in NM No.1154/2018.
Affidavit of evidence of PW-1, Ms.Rena Nunes is already filed is t.o.r. and marked as Exh.5. It is read and recorded.
Matter adjd to 26.07.2022 for admissibility of documents.
LO at 04.15 pm
Adv.Gayatri Nayak i/b.Adv.R.P. Khobragade for deft. present.
Matter adjd to 26.07.2022 for admissibility of documents.
Next Purpose: RECORDING EVIDENCE
Next Hearing Date: 26-07-2022
Date: 20-06-2022
Business: Plaintiff No.3 present.
Adv.Mr.Ostin Fernandis for plaintiff present.
KB
LO at 12.45 pm
Same appearance.
NM No.1680/2018 in NM No.1154/2018.
Affidavit of evidence of PW-1, Ms.Rena Nunes is already filed is t.o.r. and marked as Exh.5. It is read and recorded.
Matter adjd to 26.07.2022 for admissibility of documents.
LO at 04.15 pm
Adv.Gayatri Nayak i/b.Adv.R.P. Khobragade for deft. present.
Matter adjd to 26.07.2022 for admissibility of documents.
Next Purpose: RECORDING EVIDENCE
Next Hearing Date: 26-07-2022
Date: 26-07-2022
Business: Adv. Mr. Fernandes for plaintiff present.
Adv. Raj Gupta for defendant No.2 present.
Defendant No.2 filed say on admissibility of documents t.o.r. marked as Exh.6.
KB.
L.O.at 12.00 noon.
Adv. Mr. Denzil Dmello for plaintiff present.
Def.no.2 present.
Def. is directed to file the say on documents with respect to the admission,denial and existence of each documents specifically.
Matter adjd 5/9/22 for say on documents/admissibility of documents.
Next Purpose: RECORDING EVIDENCE
Next Hearing Date: 05-09-2022
Date: 05-09-2022
Business: Adv.Ms.Geeta Sonawane for plaintiff present.
Adv.Ms.Sapana Khobragade for deft.No.2 present. She orally requested for time to file additional say on documents.
On 20.06.2022 the plaintiff alongwith Affidavit of evidence has filed compilation of documents, the list is remained be exhibited. It is exhibited today as Exh.5A.
By consent matter is adjd to 03.10.2022 at 11.00 am for additional say on documents/R/E.
Next Purpose: RECORDING EVIDENCE
Next Hearing Date: 03-10-2022
Date: 05-09-2022
Business: Adv.Ms.Geeta Sonawane for plaintiff present.
Adv.Ms.Sapana Khobragade for deft.No.2 present. She orally requested for time to file additional say on documents.
On 20.06.2022 the plaintiff alongwith Affidavit of evidence has filed compilation of documents, the list is remained be exhibited. It is exhibited today as Exh.5A.
By consent matter is adjd to 03.10.2022 at 11.00 am for additional say on documents/R/E.
Next Purpose: RECORDING EVIDENCE
Next Hearing Date: 03-10-2022
Date: 03-10-2022
Business: Defendant No.2 present.
Adv.Fernandis for plaintiff present and requested for time to take steps as plaintiff No.1 has expired.
Matter adjd to 15.12.2022 for steps in respect of deceased plaintiff No.1/ additional say on documents.
Next Purpose: FOR TAKING STEPS
Next Hearing Date: 15-12-2022
Date: 15-12-2022
Business: Adv. Karen Kaya for plaintiff present.
Draft ch/s tendered by the plaintiff. Leave granted to register.
Adv Mr. Abhijit Naik for defendant no.2 present.
He received copy of ch/s.
Matter adjd to 23/02/2022 for ch/s. reply
Next Purpose: REPLY
Next Hearing Date: 23-02-2023
Date: 23-02-2023
Business: Adv. Denzil Dmello for plaintiff present
Adv. Khobragade for defendant no.2 present.
the Plaintiff tender register C/S.no. 24 of 2023 along with supporting affidavit.
The defendant no. 2 filed hand written no objection on C/s. the plaintiff to satisfy service of C/S. on defendant no.1
Matter adjd to 31-03-2023 for compliance and order in C/S.
Judge
Next Purpose: COMPLIANCE
Next Hearing Date: 31-03-2023
Date: 31-03-2023
Business: Adv.Ms.Karen Koya i/b.Adv.Denzil Dmello for plaintiff present.
Adv.Mr.Raj Gupta for defendant No.2 present.
The Adv.for plaintiff requested time to file proof of service of chamber summons on defendant No.2.
Matter adjd to 27.06.2023 for service affidavit of ch/s.
Next Purpose: AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE
Next Hearing Date: 27-06-2023
Date: 31-03-2023
Business: Adv.Ms.Karen Koya i/b.Adv.Denzil Dmello for plaintiff present.
Adv.Mr.Raj Gupta for defendant No.2 present.
The Adv.for plaintiff requested time to file proof of service of chamber summons on defendant No.2.
Matter adjd to 27.06.2023 for service affidavit of ch/s.
Next Purpose: AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE
Next Hearing Date: 27-06-2023
Date: 27-06-2023
Business: Adv. Farnandis for plaintiff present.
Adv. Abhijeet for defendant no.2 present.
None for defendant no.1.
Exh.7 Adv. For plaintiff tender affidavit of service in ch/s no. 24/2023 t.o.r. marked as Exh.07.
This ch/s taken out by the plaintiff no. 3 seeking the deletion the name of the plaintiff no.1. who died on 09.09.2022, leaving behind the plaintiff no. 2 and 3 to be her legal representative. The ch/s is supported with the affidavit of plaintiff no. 3 and the copy of death certificate of plaintiff no.1 Luizinha Nunes the Ld. counsel for the defendant no. 2 offered no objection for allowing the ch/s. The other defendants did not file any reply to the ch/s. Considering the nature of the ch/s and the contention made there in. I do not see any just ground to refuse the ch/s as sought for. Hence the ch/s stands allowed. The plaintiffs are allowed to make necessary amendment in the plaint. So as to delete the name of plaintiff no.1 within 2 weeks hereof and to file amended plaint with copies to the other sides, within the stipulated period.
The Matter is adjd.to 22.08.2023 for compliance.
Next Purpose: COMPLIANCE
Next Hearing Date: 22-08-2023
Date: 22-08-2023
Business: Adv. Denzil Dmello for plaintiff present and filed affidavit of service of amended plaint t.o.r. marked as Exh.9
Adv. Raj Gupta for defendant no. 2 present.
Matter is adjd.to 26-09-2023 for steps 11.00am
Next Purpose: FOR___________________
Next Hearing Date: 26-09-2023
Date: 26-09-2023
Business: Adv. Fernandes for plaintiff present.
Adv. Qureshi for defendant no. 2 present.
Matter is adjd.to 27-10-2023 for say on documents.
Next Purpose: FILING SAY
Next Hearing Date: 27-10-2023
Date: 27-10-2023
Business: Adv. Fernandies for plaintiff present.
Adv. Sapna Khobragade for defendant present.
Matter is adjd.to 07-12-2023 for say.
Next Purpose: FILING SAY
Next Hearing Date: 07-12-2023
Date: 07-12-2023
Business: Adv. Fernandes for plaintiff present.
Adv. Raj Gupta for defendant no. 2 present.
Since no one is appearing for defendant no. 1. The matter shall proceed without say of defendant no. 1 on admissible of documents relied upon by the plaintiff vide list of document Exh. 5A.
Matter is adjd.to 24-01-2024 for Hrg on admissibility documents
Next Purpose: ADMISSION DENIAL
Next Hearing Date: 24-01-2024
Date: 24-01-2024
Business: Adv. Geeta Sonawane for plaintiff present.
None for defendant
Matter is adjourned to 14-02-2024 for admission denial.
Next Purpose: ADMISSION DENIAL
Next Hearing Date: 14-02-2024
Date: 14-02-2024
Business: Adv. Geeta Sonawane for plaintiff present.
Adv. Aayesha Qureshi for defendants present.
Matter is adjourned to 12-03-2024 for admission denial.
Next Purpose: ADMISSION DENIAL
Next Hearing Date: 12-03-2024
Date: 12-03-2024
Business: Adv. Geeta Sonawane for plaintiff present.
None for defendant
Matter is adjourned to 05-04-2024 for admission denial. 11.00am
Next Purpose: ADMISSION DENIAL
Next Hearing Date: 05-04-2024
Date: 05-04-2024
Business: Adv. Geeta Sonawane for plaintiff present.
None for defendant
Matter is adjourned to 14-06-2024 for hrg on admissibility of documents.
Next Purpose: HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 14-06-2024
Date: 14-06-2024
Business: Adv. Geena Sonawane for plaintiff present.
Adv. Akshay Gutaka a/w Adv. Sapna Khobragade for defendant no.2 present.
later on 3.45 pm.
Plaintiff no. 3 in person present.
Adv. Ayesha Qureshi for defendant no. 2 present.
Plaintiff filed affidavit in reply for draft NM dtd. 24/04/2024 by deft. no. 2 It is taken on record and marked as Exh.10
On the oral request of adv. For defendant no. 2, time is extended for register the draft NM.
Matter is adjourned to 09-08-2024 for filing registered NM and NM Hrg.
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 09-08-2024
Date: 09-08-2024
Business: CORAM:H.H.J.SHRI.R. S. ARADHYE(C.R.NO.62)
Adv.Geeta Sonawane for plaintiff present.
Defendant No.2 in person present and tendered registered N/M No.2440/2024. He further filed affidavit in rejoinder to the reply of N/M No.2440/2024.
Copy of the same served to the other side.
Matter is adjourned to 25/09/2024 for hearing on N/M.
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 25-09-2024
Date: 09-08-2024
Business: CORAM:H.H.J.SHRI.R. S. ARADHYE(C.R.NO.62)
Adv.Geeta Sonawane for plaintiff present.
Defendant No.2 in person present and tendered registered N/M No.2440/2024. He further filed affidavit in rejoinder to the reply of N/M No.2440/2024.
Copy of the same served to the other side.
Matter is adjourned to 25/09/2024 for hearing on N/M.
Next Purpose: NM FOR HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 25-09-2024
Date: 25-09-2024
Business: Adv. Geeta Sonawane-Rahate a/w plaintiff No.3 present.
Adv. Swapna Khobragade a/w defendant No.2 prsesent.
Later on 03.44 pm
Heard both the sides in NM No.2440/2024.
Matter is adjourned to 18.10.2024 for NM order in 2440/2024 and hearing in 1680/2018.
Next Purpose: NM ORDERS
Next Hearing Date: 18-10-2024
Date: 25-09-2024
Business: Adv. Geeta Sonawane-Rahate a/w plaintiff No.3 present.
Adv. Swapna Khobragade a/w defendant No.2 prsesent.
Later on 03.44 pm
Heard both the sides in NM No.2440/2024.
Matter is adjourned to 18.10.2024 for NM order in 2440/2024 and hearing in 1680/2018.
Next Purpose: NM ORDERS
Next Hearing Date: 18-10-2024
Date: 18-10-2024
Business: CORAM - HIS HONOUR THE PRINCIPAL JUDGE,
SHRI. A. SUBRAMANIAM (C. R. NO.19)
(Matter received from CR No.62 as per order dtd. 08.10.2024.)
Adv. Rahul S. Yadav h/f Adv. Sapna Khobragade for Defendant No.2 present.
It is seen from the record that NM 2440/24 is fixed for orders. Considering the same matter is transferred back to Court Room No.62 for passing of orders. Placed on 21.10.2024.
Next Purpose: NM ORDERS
Next Hearing Date: 21-10-2024
Date: 18-10-2024
Business: CORAM - HIS HONOUR THE PRINCIPAL JUDGE,
SHRI. A. SUBRAMANIAM (C. R. NO.19)
(Matter received from CR No.62 as per order dtd. 08.10.2024.)
Adv. Rahul S. Yadav h/f Adv. Sapna Khobragade for Defendant No.2 present.
It is seen from the record that NM 2440/24 is fixed for orders. Considering the same matter is transferred back to Court Room No.62 for passing of orders. Placed on 21.10.2024.
Next Purpose: NM ORDERS
Next Hearing Date: 21-10-2024
Date: 21-10-2024
Business: CORAM-HIS HONOUR THE PRINCIPAL JUDGE SHRI. A. SUBRAMANIAM (CR.19)
None present for the parties.
Matter is transferred back to Court Room No.62 for passing of orders.
Adjourned for compliance and order to 22.10.2024.
Next Purpose: COMPLIANCE
Next Hearing Date: 22-10-2024
Date: 22-10-2024
Business: None for plaintiff.
Adv. Swapna Khobragade for defendant no.2 present.
Today the matter is under caption of NM order and re-transferred from CR. No.19 to this Court.
Matter is adjourned to 08.11.2024 for order.
Next Purpose: ORDER
Next Hearing Date: 08-11-2024
Date: 08-11-2024
Business: None for plaintiff.
Adv. Vinit Dhotre h/f Adv. Swapna Khobragade a/w defendant no. 2 present.
NM No. 1680/2018 is pending since last more that 5 years but plaintiff proceed with it. Hence, it be kept for order on next date.
Matter is adjourned to 03.12.2024 for order in both the notice of motions.
Next Purpose: ORDER
Next Hearing Date: 03-12-2024
Date: 08-11-2024
Business: None for plaintiff.
Adv. Vinit Dhotre h/f Adv. Swapna Khobragade a/w defendant no. 2 present.
NM No. 1680/2018 is pending since last more that 5 years but plaintiff proceed with it. Hence, it be kept for order on next date.
Matter is adjourned to 03.12.2024 for order in both the notice of motions.
Next Purpose: ORDER
Next Hearing Date: 03-12-2024
Date: 08-11-2024
Business: None for plaintiff.
Adv. Vinit Dhotre h/f Adv. Swapna Khobragade a/w defendant no. 2 present.
NM No. 1680/2018 is pending since last more that 5 years but plaintiff proceed with it. Hence, it be kept for order on next date.
Matter is adjourned to 03.12.2024 for order in both the notice of motions.
Next Purpose: ORDER
Next Hearing Date: 03-12-2024
Date: 03-12-2024
Business: Adv. Geeta Sonawane for plaintiff present.
Adv. Sapna Khobragade for defendant No.2 present.
Today matter is for order in NM No.2440/2024 but Court is busy in dictation of order in NM No. 3865/2024 so order could not be passed.
Matter is adjourned to 06.01.2025 for order in NM No. 2440/2024.
Next Purpose: NM ORDERS
Next Hearing Date: 06-01-2025
Date: 03-12-2024
Business: Adv. Geeta Sonawane for plaintiff present.
Adv. Sapna Khobragade for defendant No.2 present.
Today matter is for order in NM No.2440/2024 but Court is busy in dictation of order in NM No. 3865/2024 so order could not be passed.
Matter is adjourned to 06.01.2025 for order in NM No. 2440/2024.
Next Purpose: NM ORDERS
Next Hearing Date: 06-01-2025
Date: 03-12-2024
Business: Adv. Geeta Sonawane for plaintiff present.
Adv. Sapna Khobragade for defendant No.2 present.
Today matter is for order in NM No.2440/2024 but Court is busy in dictation of order in NM No. 3865/2024 so order could not be passed.
Matter is adjourned to 06.01.2025 for order in NM No. 2440/2024.
Next Purpose: NM ORDERS
Next Hearing Date: 06-01-2025
Date: 06-01-2025
Next Purpose: ARGUMENTS
Next Hearing Date: 21-02-2025
Date: 06-01-2025
Next Purpose: ARGUMENTS
Next Hearing Date: 21-02-2025
Date: 06-01-2025
Next Purpose: ARGUMENTS
Next Hearing Date: 21-02-2025
Date: 21-02-2025
Business: Adv. Geeta Sonawane Rahate for plaintiff present and tendered application for further compilation of motion. It is taken on record and marked as Exh.11.
Adv. Sapna Khobragade for defendant no.2 present.
Matter is adjourned to 03.03.2025 for argument.
Next Purpose: ARGUMENTS
Next Hearing Date: 03-03-2025
Date: 03-03-2025
Business: None for plaintiff present.
None for defendant.
LO at 02.45 pm
Adv. Gita Sonawane / Rahate for plaintiff present.
Defendant No. 2 in person present.
KB.
LO at 03.45 pm
Adv. Gita Sonawane / Rahate for plaintiff present.
Defendant No. 2 in person present.
Matter is adjourned to 13.06.2025 for Argument.
Next Purpose: ARGUMENTS
Next Hearing Date: 13-06-2025
Date: 13-06-2025
Business: P.O. is on Leave (2nd Session).
Next Purpose: ARGUMENTS
Next Hearing Date: 10-07-2025
Date: 10-07-2025
Business: Court is on leave.
Next Purpose: ARGUMENTS
Next Hearing Date: 11-08-2025
Date: 11-08-2025
Business: P. O. is on half day leave after 2nd session.
Next Purpose: ARGUMENTS
Next Hearing Date: 09-09-2025
Date: 09-09-2025
Business: In 2nd session P.O. is on leave.
Next Purpose: ARGUMENTS
Next Hearing Date: 03-10-2025
Date: 03-10-2025
Business: Court is on leave
Next Purpose: ARGUMENTS
Next Hearing Date: 27-10-2025
Date: 27-10-2025
Business: Plaintiff No. 3 in person present.
Adv. Ankur Jain for defendant no.1 present and filed VP. It is taken on record and marked as Exh.12
He also filed reply in NM No. 2440/2024. It is taken on record and marked as Exh.13. Copy of the same furnished to def. no.1 and 2.
Adv. Rajesh Khobragade for defendant no.2 present.
Heard the plaintiff no.3 in person and advocates for def. nos.1 and 2 on NM No. 2440/2024.
F.R.S.R. following order passed in NM No. 2440/2024 :
Order
1. The Notice of Motion No. 2440/2024 is hereby allowed.
2. “Shetgiri and Associates, Saphalya, S.K.Bole Road, Kawli Wadi, Dadar (West), Dadar, Mumbai” - Empanelled Structural Engineers from the panel of MCGM are hereby appointed to carry out the structural audit of the locked premises owned by the defendant no.2 as per Section 353(B) of the MCGM Act.
3. The Empanelled Structural Engineers to submit the Structural Audit Report of the locked premises owned by defendant no.2, in prescribed proforma annexed to the MCGM Guidelines within three months from the date of this order.
4. The defendant no.2 to pay/bear the fees of the Structural Engineers as per rules.
5. The defendants are hereby allowed to enter the suit premises only for limited purpose of assisting the structural engineers to complete the structural audit work.
6. The defendants should not violate the earlier orders of this court about removing the utensils or other articles or doing any other illegal activities in the suit premises.
7. The defendant no.2 to inform the Structural Engineers (Shetgiri and Associates) about their appointment as Structural Engineers to conduct the structural audit of the locked premises of the building and also the MCGM and to do the compliance to complete this work.
8. The Notice of Motion No. 2440/2024 is hereby disposed of.
Matter is adjourned to 25.11.2025 for compliance.
Next Purpose: COMPLIANCE
Next Hearing Date: 17-11-2025
Date: 17-11-2025
Business: CORAM : H.H.J. SHRI. P. G. BHOSALE (C.R. NO.62)
Not on board taken on board by preceipe. Exh.14.
Adv. Sapna Khobragade for defendant No. 2 present and filed preceipe application. It is taken on record and marked as Exh.14.
She also filed application to amend the name of the structural auditor in the order dated 27.10.2025. It is taken on record and marked as Exh.15.
Order passed below Exh.15
The advocate for defendant No. 2 has prayed to amend the name of the structural auditor in the order passed by this Court on 27.10.2025 in NM 2440/2024. She states that the Structural Auditor appointed by this Court M/s. Shetgiri and Associates are not on the panel of BMC for the purpose of Structural Audit of locked premises owned by defendant No. 2.
The Advocate for defendant No. 2 has requested to appoint Mr. Rutvij Patel having office at A001, Siddhivinayak Park, Plot No. 21, Sec-8A, Airoli, NaviMumbai, structural auditor from the BMC Panel. Accordingly, the name of M/s. Shetgiri and Associates is substituted with the name of Mr. Rutvij Patel, having office at A001, Siddhivinayak Park, Plot No. 21, Sec-8A, Airoli, Navi Mumbai. The newly appointed structural auditor Mr. Rutvij Patel to submit the structural audit report within 3 months from the date of his appointment.
The rest of the order is maintained as it is.
Adv. Geeta Sonawane for plaintiff present.
Adv. Ankur Jain for defendant No. 1 present.
Matter is already adjourned to 25.11.2025 for compliance.
Judge
Next Purpose: COMPLIANCE
Next Hearing Date: 25-11-2025
Date: 25-11-2025
Business: CORAM : H.H.J. SHRI. P. G. BHOSALE (C.R. NO.62)
Adv. Geeta Sonawane for plaintiff present.
Adv. Ankur Jain for defendant no. 1 present and waived the service of writ of summons.
Adv. Swapna Khobragade for defendant no. 2 present.
Matter is adjourned to 12-02-2026 for compliance.
Judge
Next Purpose: COMPLIANCE
Next Hearing Date: 12-02-2026
Date: 12-02-2026
Business: CORAM : H.H.J. SHRI. N. V. JIWANE (C.R. NO.62)
Adv. Geeta Sonawane for plaintiff present.
Adv. Ankur Jain for defendant no. 1 present.
Adv. Gayatri Nayak for defendant no. 2 present.
Matter is adjourned to 16.04.2026 for compliance.
Next Purpose: COMPLIANCE
Next Hearing Date: 16-04-2026
Date: 16-04-2026
Business: CORAM : H.H.J. SMT. S. S. NAGUR (C.R. NO.62)
Matter called at 02.50 pm
Adv. Geeta Sonawane for plaintiff present.
Adv. Ankur Jain for defendant no. 1 present.
Kept back
Later on at 03.40 pm
Adv. Geeta Sonawane for plaintiff present.
Adv. Ankur Jain for defendant no. 1 present.
Adv. Raj Gupta for defendant alongwith defendant no. 2 present and tendered compliance report of structural audit. It is taken on record and marked as Exh.16.
Matter is adjourned to 23.04.2026 for issues.
Next Purpose: FRAMING ISSUES
Next Hearing Date: 23-04-2026
Date: 23-04-2026
Business: Court is on leave.
Next Purpose: FRAMING ISSUES
Next Hearing Date: 10-06-2026
Date: 10-06-2026
Business: CORAM : H.H.J. SMT. S. S. NAGUR (C.R. NO.62)
Matter called at 11.40 am
None for plaintiff present.
Adv. Annkur Jain for defendant No. 1 present.
Kept Back.
Later on at 12.30 pm
Adv. Lubdha Bhoir h/f Adv. Sapna Khobragade for defendant No. 2 present.
Kept Back.
Later on at 02.55 pm
Adv. Geeta Sonawane for plaintiff present.
Adv. Annkur Jain for defendant No. 1 present.
Court time over. Hence matter adjourned.
Matter is adjourned to 31.07.2026 for framing issues.
Next Purpose: FRAMING ISSUES
Next Hearing Date: 31-07-2026
Date: 31-07-2026
Business: CORAM : SMT. A. K. MANDAVGADE (C.R. NO.62)
None for plaintiff present.
Adv. Ankur Jain for defendant No. 1 present.
Adv. Anjali Magkar a/w Adv. Vineet Dhotre h/f Adv. Khobragade for defendant No. 2 present.
Draft issues not filed.
Matter is adjourned to 05.10.2026 for draft issues.
Next Purpose: DRAFT ISSUES
Next Hearing Date: 05-10-2026Additional Case Details
Additional Case Details
Filing Number: 103278/2018 Filing Date: 27-02-2018 First Hearing Date: 26th March 2018 Court Number And Judge: 62-COURT 62 AD-HOC ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE
Orders
0No order text is available in this record.
TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.