Skip to main content
NOTICE OF MOTION

Ashwin Malshi Dharod- Suit Stamp No. 2965/2018VsAssistant Divisional Engineer (Track) Central Railway Byculla

CNR MHCC01002903201812-COURT 12 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE
City Civil Court, Mumbai
Mumbai · Maharashtra (MH)
CASE DISPOSED
Uncontested--OTHERWISE
Decision Date: 24th June 2019

TrustJury record updated 10 Sept 2026

Case Overview

Registration Number
100835/2018
Registration Date
27 Feb 2018

Advocates

1

For Petitioner

For Respondent

    Not available

    Parties

    2

    Petitioner

    1. 1Ashwin Malshi Dharod- Suit Stamp No. 2965/2018

    Respondent

    1. 1Assistant Divisional Engineer (Track) Central Railway Byculla

    Acts & Sections

    1
    Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Land (Vidarbha Region and Kutch Area) Act · Sec 9

    Case History / Proceedings

    Case History
    Date: 27-02-2018
Business: Adv. Paikrao, Adv. Pokle along with Adv. Vaidya for Plaintiff
Adv.  P.J. Pandiyan for Defendant
Plaintiff sought ad interim protection in respect of suit premises, that defendant be restrained from demolishing suit premises till the decision of notice of motion.
          Ld Advocate appearing for the defendant submitted that he is require two weeks time to collect appropriate documents and to file say to Notice of Motion.  He undertake that defendant will not take any action against the plaintiff till filing reply to NM.  An undertaking given by defendant is accepted, hence following order.
ORDER
1.   Parties to maintain status quo in respect of suit premises till filing reply by the defendant.
Advocate for plaintiff tendered regd NM 835/2018 along with affidavit in support.
Matter Adjd for NM reply to 15.03.2018.
Reason For Adjournment: court time is over
Next Purpose: NM REPLYREJOINDER
Next Hearing Date: 15-03-2018

Date: 15-03-2018
Reason For Adjournment: court time is over
Next Purpose: NM REPLYREJOINDER
Next Hearing Date: 25-04-2018

Date: 25-04-2018
Reason For Adjournment: court time is over
Next Purpose: NM REPLYREJOINDER
Next Hearing Date: 08-08-2018

Date: 08-08-2018
Reason For Adjournment: court time is over
Next Purpose: NM REPLYREJOINDER
Next Hearing Date: 27-09-2018

Date: 27-09-2018
Reason For Adjournment: court time is over
Next Purpose: NM REPLYREJOINDER
Next Hearing Date: 30-10-2018

Date: 30-10-2018
Business: Adv. Mr. Eknath Dhokale alongwith Ms. Neelam Chheda for Plaintiff present and seeking leave under section 80(2) of CPC.  Leave granted.
Adv. Mr. Pandian for Defendant present and seeking time to file reply. Time granted.
Suit be registered by the Plaintiff.
Matter adj. to 24/01/2019 for NM Reply
Next Purpose: NM REPLYREJOINDER
Next Hearing Date: 24-01-2019

Date: 24-01-2019
Reason For Adjournment: court time is over
Next Purpose: NM REPLYREJOINDER
Next Hearing Date: 27-02-2019

Date: 27-02-2019
Reason For Adjournment: court time is over
Next Purpose: NM REPLYREJOINDER
Next Hearing Date: 15-06-2019

Date: 15-06-2019
Next Purpose: NM REPLYREJOINDER
Next Hearing Date: 24-06-2019

Date: 24-06-2019
Business: Adv. Dhokale for the Plaintiff present.
Adv. Pandian for Defendant present.
Adv for the Defendant on instruction has submitted that defts will follow due process of law before evicting, the Plaintiff from suit shop. In view of his statement on behalf of the Defendant, advocate for the Plaintiff has given consent for disposal of N/M and suit. Thus, by accepting the statement on behalf of the Defendant, that the Defendant will follow due process of law before evicting the Plaintiff from the suit shop, suit is hereby disposed of and consequently, N/M no. 835/18 is hereby disposed of.
Nature Of Disposal: OTHERWISE
Disposal Date: 24-06-2019

    Additional Case Details

    Additional Case Details
    Filing Number: 103254/2018
Filing Date: 27-02-2018
First Hearing Date: 27th February 2018
Decision Date: 24th June 2019
Court Number And Judge: 12-COURT 12  ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE

    Orders

    2
    Final Order 1
    24 Jun 2019
    Order Details: Notice of Motion
Pdf Text: Adv. Dhokale for the Plaintiff present. Adv. Pandian for Defendant present. Adv for the Defendant
on instruction has submitted that defts will follow due process of law before evicting, the Plaintiff
from suit shop. In view of his statement on behalf of the Defendant, advocate for the Plaintiff has
given consent for disposal of N/M and suit. Thus, by accepting the statement on behalf of the
Defendant, that the Defendant will follow due process of law before evicting the Plaintiff from the
suit shop, suit is hereby disposed of and consequently, N/M no. 835/18 is hereby disposed of.
Sd/-
Judge
-- 1 of 1 --
    Order 1
    24 Jun 2019
    Order Details: Notice of Motion
Pdf Text: Adv. Dhokale for the Plaintiff present. Adv. Pandian for Defendant present. Adv for the Defendant
on instruction has submitted that defts will follow due process of law before evicting, the Plaintiff
from suit shop. In view of his statement on behalf of the Defendant, advocate for the Plaintiff has
given consent for disposal of N/M and suit. Thus, by accepting the statement on behalf of the
Defendant, that the Defendant will follow due process of law before evicting the Plaintiff from the
suit shop, suit is hereby disposed of and consequently, N/M no. 835/18 is hereby disposed of.
Sd/-
Judge
-- 1 of 1 --

    TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.