Skip to main content
NOTICE OF MOTION

Zulfikar Ali Shaukat Ali Shaikh +2 moreVsShaukatali Shaikh +2 more

CNR MHCC0100284020183-COURT 03 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE
City Civil Court, Mumbai
Mumbai · Maharashtra (MH)
CASE DISPOSED
Uncontested--OTHER
Decision Date: 15th June 2019

TrustJury record updated 10 Sept 2026

Case Overview

Registration Number
100787/2018
Registration Date
26 Feb 2018

Advocates

1

For Petitioner

    Not available

    For Respondent

    Parties

    6

    Petitioner

    1. 1Zulfikar Ali Shaukat Ali Shaikh
    2. 2Intajarli Shaukatali Shaikh
    3. 3Rajjabali Shaukatali Shaikh

    Respondent

    1. 1Shaukatali Shaikh
    2. 2Naresh Palrecha
    3. 3Sudhir S, Shinde Arun Deorao Shinde and Ors.

    Acts & Sections

    1
    Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Land (Vidarbha Region and Kutch Area) Act · Sec 9

    Case History / Proceedings

    Case History
    Date: 15-06-2018
Business: Hence matter adj. to 06.08.2018.
Next Purpose: NOTICE OF MOTION
Next Hearing Date: 06-08-2018

Date: 06-08-2018
Business: Matter adj. for Evidence of Plaintiff to 24.10.2018.
Next Purpose: NOTICE OF MOTION
Next Hearing Date: 24-10-2018

Date: 24-10-2018
Business: Matter adjn to 07.03.19 for  Recording Evidence.
Next Purpose: NOTICE OF MOTION
Next Hearing Date: 07-03-2019

Date: 07-03-2019
Business: Matter adj. for Evidence of Plaintiff to 10.06.2019.
Next Purpose: NOTICE OF MOTION
Next Hearing Date: 10-06-2019

Date: 10-06-2019
Business: Matter stands Adj for dismissal order to 15.06.19
Next Purpose: NOTICE OF MOTION
Next Hearing Date: 15-06-2019

Date: 15-06-2019
Business: None present for plaintiff.
Adv. Shamshan Ahmed for defendant present.
As per roznama plaintiff was granted LC for leading evidence inspite of granting sufficient time subject to cost of Rs. 2,000/-, no steps taken by the plaintiff. Cost not paid.
Case is pending without any progress. No purpose will be served by keeping the matter pending.
Hence, Suit is dismissed in default under Order 9 rule 8 of CPC for want of Prosecution. No orders as to costs.
Chamber summons or notice of motion, if any, is disposed of as infructuous.
Nature Of Disposal: OTHER
Disposal Date: 15-06-2019

    Additional Case Details

    Additional Case Details
    Filing Number: 103146/2018
Filing Date: 26-02-2018
First Hearing Date: 15th June 2018
Decision Date: 15th June 2019
Court Number And Judge: 3-COURT 03  ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE

    Orders

    2
    Final Order 1
    15 Jun 2019
    Order Details: Other
Pdf Text: Daily Status
IN THE COURT OF :COURT 3 ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE
Case No. :NOTICE OF MOTION/0100787/2018
1. Zulfikar Ali Shaukat Ali Shaikh 2.Intajarli Shaukatali Shaikh 3.Rajjabali Shaukatali Shaikh Vs
1.Shaukatali Shaikh 2.Naresh Palrecha 3.Sudhir S, Shinde Arun Deorao Shinde and Ors.
Date : 15-06-2019
Business : None present for plaintiff. Adv. Shamshan Ahmed for
defendant present. As per roznama plaintiff was granted LC
for leading evidence inspite of granting sufficient time
subject to cost of Rs. 2,000/-, no steps taken by the
plaintiff. Cost not paid. Case is pending without any
progress. No purpose will be served by keeping the matter
pending. Hence, Suit is dismissed in default under Order 9
rule 8 of CPC for want of Prosecution. No orders as to
costs. Chamber summons or notice of motion, if any, is
disposed of as infructuous.
Nature of Disposal : OTHER
Disposal Date : 15-06-2019
COURT 3 ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE
-- 1 of 1 --
    Order 1
    15 Jun 2019
    Order Details: Other
Pdf Text: Daily Status
IN THE COURT OF :COURT 3 ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE
Case No. :NOTICE OF MOTION/0100787/2018
1. Zulfikar Ali Shaukat Ali Shaikh 2.Intajarli Shaukatali Shaikh 3.Rajjabali Shaukatali Shaikh Vs
1.Shaukatali Shaikh 2.Naresh Palrecha 3.Sudhir S, Shinde Arun Deorao Shinde and Ors.
Date : 15-06-2019
Business : None present for plaintiff. Adv. Shamshan Ahmed for
defendant present. As per roznama plaintiff was granted LC
for leading evidence inspite of granting sufficient time
subject to cost of Rs. 2,000/-, no steps taken by the
plaintiff. Cost not paid. Case is pending without any
progress. No purpose will be served by keeping the matter
pending. Hence, Suit is dismissed in default under Order 9
rule 8 of CPC for want of Prosecution. No orders as to
costs. Chamber summons or notice of motion, if any, is
disposed of as infructuous.
Nature of Disposal : OTHER
Disposal Date : 15-06-2019
COURT 3 ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE
-- 1 of 1 --

    TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.