Skip to main content
CHAMBER SUMMONS

Kantilal Kothari HUFVsOrbit Constructions +1 more

CNR MHCC01002826202028-COURT 28 ADD SESSIONS JUDGE
City Civil Court, Mumbai
Mumbai · Maharashtra (MH)
CASE DISPOSED
Contested--ALLOWED
Decision Date: 04th March 2021

TrustJury record updated 28 Sept 2026

Case Overview

Registration Number
100398/2020
Registration Date
03 Mar 2020

Advocates

1

For Petitioner

For Respondent

    Not available

    Parties

    3

    Petitioner

    1. 1Kantilal Kothari HUF

    Respondent

    1. 1Orbit Constructions
    2. 2PUJIT AGARWAL

    Acts & Sections

    1
    Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act · Sec 9

    Case History / Proceedings

    Case History
    Date: 31-03-2020
Next Purpose: CHAMBER SUMMONS
Next Hearing Date: 17-04-2020

Date: 17-04-2020
Reason For Adjournment: National Lock Down
Next Purpose: CHAMBER SUMMONS
Next Hearing Date: 11-05-2020

Date: 11-05-2020
Reason For Adjournment: National Lock Down
Next Purpose: CHAMBER SUMMONS
Next Hearing Date: 30-05-2020

Date: 30-05-2020
Reason For Adjournment: National Lock Down
Next Purpose: CHAMBER SUMMONS
Next Hearing Date: 10-06-2020

Date: 10-06-2020
Reason For Adjournment: National Lock Down
Next Purpose: CHAMBER SUMMONS
Next Hearing Date: 04-09-2020

Date: 04-09-2020
Reason For Adjournment: Adjourned due to Covid-19
Next Purpose: CHAMBER SUMMONS
Next Hearing Date: 29-10-2020

Date: 29-10-2020
Reason For Adjournment: Adjourned due to Covid-19
Next Purpose: CHAMBER SUMMONS
Next Hearing Date: 28-01-2021

Date: 28-01-2021
Business: Adv. Ketaki prajapati for plaintiff
Adv khatri for defendant
By consent adjd to 04-03-2021
Next Purpose: CHAMBER SUMMONS
Next Hearing Date: 04-03-2021

Date: 04-03-2021
Business: Adv. Vora for plaintiff
Adv. Khatri for defendant
None for respondents in Ch/s 398/20.
Order on Ch/s 398/20-
As far as the defendants are concerned, the roznama dtd.17.02.2020 shows that the Adv for defendant submitted that she has no objection to allow the Ch/s. The record reveals that respondents No.1 and 2 are the partners. Despite service they did not come forward to resist the Ch/s. In any case apparently respondents No.1 and 2 are the partners. Resultantly, at this stage the amendment as prayed deserved to be allowed. Hence, the Ch/s 398/20 is allowed and permission is granted to the plaintiff to carry out the amendments as prayed vide the Ch/s.398/20.
Adjd for compliance to 24-06-2021
Nature Of Disposal: ALLOWED
Disposal Date: 04-03-2021

    Additional Case Details

    Additional Case Details
    Filing Number: 102560/2020
Filing Date: 03-03-2020
First Hearing Date: 31st March 2020
Decision Date: 04th March 2021
Court Number And Judge: 28-COURT 28 ADD SESSIONS JUDGE

    Orders

    1
    Final Order 1
    04 Mar 2021
    Order Details: Chamber summons
Pdf Text: Back
Daily Status
IN THE COURT OF :COURT 28 ADD SESSIONS JUDGE
Case No. :CHAMBER SUMMONS/0100398/2020
Kantilal Kothari HUF Vs 1. Orbit Constructions 2. Pujit Agarwal
Date : 04-03-2021
Business : Adv. Vora for plaintiff Adv. Khatri for defendant None for
respondents in Ch/s 398/20. Order on Ch/s 398/20- As far
as the defendants are concerned, the roznama
dtd.17.02.2020 shows that the Adv for defendant submitted
that she has no objection to allow the Ch/s. The record
reveals that respondents No.1 and 2 are the partners.
Despite service they did not come forward to resist the
Ch/s. In any case apparently respondents No.1 and 2 are the
partners. Resultantly, at this stage the amendment as prayed
deserved to be allowed. Hence, the Ch/s 398/20 is allowed
and permission is granted to the plaintiff to carry out the
amendments as prayed vide the Ch/s.398/20. Adjd for
compliance to 24-06-2021
Nature of Disposal : ALLOWED
Disposal Date : 04-03-2021
COURT 28 ADD SESSIONS JUDGE
-- 1 of 1 --

    TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.