Skip to main content
Court Order

Final Order 1

CNR MHCC01002822202023 Sept 2021
City Civil Court, Mumbai
Mumbai · Maharashtra (MH)
Back to Case

Full Order Text

Final Order 1 · 23 Sept 2021 · CNR MHCC010028222020

Order Details: Chamber summons
Pdf Text: 1 Ch.S.413-20 in Comm. Suit no.1025-2021
MHCC010028222020
IN THE CITY CIVIL COURT FOR GREATER BOMBAY
AT BOMBAY.
CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.413 OF 2020
IN
COMMERCIAL SUIT NO.1025 OF 2021
Dena Bank ]
a body corporate Constituted under the ]
Banking Companies (Acquisition & Transfer ]
of Undertakings) Act,1970 having its Head Office ]
at Dena Corporate Center, C10, 'G' block, ]
BandraKurla Complex, Bandra (E) ]
Mumbai400 051 ]
And one of its Branch office amongst others ]
known As situated at as Dena Bank, Colaba ]
Branch, situated at 32,SBS Road, Dena Bank ]
Bhavan, Colaba, Mumbai400005, ]
State of Maharashtra, represented by ]
Mr.Sanjay Vinayak Gondhalekar, ]
the Manger. ]...Plaintiffs
Versus
1. M/s. Shidhivinayak Tours & Travels ]
(Proprietor Mr.Prasad Niranjan Patil) ]
E602, Floor6E Wing, Mahalaxmi CHS Ltd. ]
P.B.Marg, Nr.Door Darshan Worli Colony, ]
Maharashtra, Mumbai400030 ]
2. Mr.Prasad Niranjan Patil ]
(Proprietor of M/s. Sidhivinayak Tours ]
and Travels) ]
Room No.137C, Hanuman Nagar, ]
P.B. Marg, Worli Colony, Near Century Mill, ]
Mumbai400030 ]....Defendants
-- 1 of 4 --
2 Ch.S.413-20 in Comm. Suit no.1025-2021
CORAM : HIS HONOUR JUDGE
SHRI. RAJESH A. SASNE
(C.R.No.32)
DATED : 23rd September, 2021.
Appearance:
Ld. Adv. Saraswati Purohit i/b Adv. Rajkumar Shukla for the plaintiff.
None for the defendants.
ORDER
This chamber summons is taken out by the plaintiff for
amendment in the plaint.
2. It is the contention of the plaintiff that as per
Amalgamation Scheme of 'Dena Bank' with 'Bank of Baroda', which is
duly approved by the Government of India, the plaintiff's bank from its
former name i.e. “Dena Bank” is changed with the name “Bank of
Baroda”. The Notification has been published to that effect. Due to this
change, the plaintiff is required to carry out necessary amendment. For
this purpose, the chamber summons is taken out by the plaintiff.
3. Heard the learned Advocate Saraswati Purohit i/b Advocate
Rajkumar Shukla for the plaintiff.
4. Due to Amalgamation Scheme, the plaintiff “Dena Bank” is
now known as “Bank of Baroda”. In view of the Notification dated 02nd
January, 2019, there is amalgamation of “Dena Bank” with “Bank of
Baroda”. Considering these facts, it is necessary to amend the plaint as
per the schedule provided with the Chamber Summons. Hence, I pass
the following order.
-- 2 of 4 --
3 Ch.S.413-20 in Comm. Suit no.1025-2021
ORDER
1. Chamber Summons No.413 of 2020 is allowed.
2. The amendment as proposed in schedule attached with chamber
summons is allowed.
3. The plaintiff to carry out the amendment within 14 days from today.
4. Chamber summons No.413 of 2020 is disposed off accordingly.
(Rajesh A.Sasne)
Judge,
City Civil & Sessions Court,
Date : 23.09.2021 Mumbai.
Dictated on : 23.09.2021
Transcribed on : 23.09.2021
Signed by HHJ on : 23.09.2021
-- 3 of 4 --
4 Ch.S.413-20 in Comm. Suit no.1025-2021
“CERTIFIED TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF THE ORIGINAL
SIGNED JUDGMENT/ORDER”
24.09.2021 at 5.35 p.m.
UPLOAD DATE AND TIME
(Mrs. K.S.Bhosale)
NAME OF STENOGRAPHER
Name of the Judge HHJ SHRI R.A.Sasne
(COURT ROOM NO.32)
Date of pronouncement of
judgment/order
23.09.2021
Judgment/order signed by P.O. on 23.09.2021
Judgment/order uploaded on 24.09.2021
-- 4 of 4 --

TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.