NOTICE OF MOTION
Mandakani Gopal Shinde Through Lhrs 1a. Rekha D. Shinde And OrsVsGopal Ganpatrao Shinde And Ors
CNR MHCC0100282020194-COURT 04 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE
City Civil Court, Mumbai
Mumbai · Maharashtra (MH)
CASE DISPOSED
Contested--DISMISSED
Decision Date: 04th February 2021
TrustJury record updated 19 Sept 2026
Case Overview
- Registration Number
- 101092/2019
- Registration Date
- 13 Mar 2019
Advocates
1For Petitioner
For Respondent
Not available
Parties
2Acts & Sections
1Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act · Sec 9
Case History / Proceedings
Case History
Date: 15-04-2019
Business: Matter adj. for Compliance and NM Hearing to 17.06.2019.
Next Purpose: NOTICE OF MOTION
Next Hearing Date: 17-06-2019
Date: 17-06-2019
Business: Advocate Mr. Hudge for Plaintiff present and filed affidavit in rejoinder to Notice of Motion t.o.r.
Advocate Ms. Salekar for Defendant no.5 present
Defendant no.2 present.
As it is 2.00 p.m., case is adjourned to 06/08/2019.
Next Purpose: NOTICE OF MOTION
Next Hearing Date: 06-08-2019
Date: 06-08-2019
Business: Court is busy in dictating Judgment in suit no.2140/17, hence case is adjourned to 25/09/2019.
Next Purpose: FOR___________________
Next Hearing Date: 25-09-2019
Date: 25-09-2019
Business: Matter called out(11.13am)
Adv.Ajit S.Hodage i/b Adv.P.G.Karande for plaintiff present.
Adv.Tanmayee Salekar for defendant no.5 present.
Adv.S.K.Paranjape for defendant no.2 present inform that the aforesaid matter is clubbed alongwith Suit No.1316/2014 which is before Court Room No.09. It is further inform that court room no.9 requested the registrar to transfer either of the matter in either of the court and matter is fixed on 21/10/19. In view of the above matter is adj to 22/10/19.
Next Purpose: FOR___________________
Next Hearing Date: 22-10-2019
Date: 22-10-2019
Business: Advocate Paranjpe for Plaintiff present
Advocate Ajit Hodge for Defendants present
By consent, case is adjourned to 02/12/2019 for recording evidence.
Next Purpose: RECORDING EVIDENCE
Next Hearing Date: 02-12-2019
Date: 02-12-2019
Business: Adv. Madkaikar for plaintiff present. And submitted that the connected suit no. 1314/16 is assigned to Court Room No. 07 and he intend to file transfer application.
Hence, Case is adjourned to 10.02.2020 for Steps.
Next Purpose: FOR TAKING STEPS
Next Hearing Date: 10-02-2020
Date: 02-12-2019
Business: Adv. Madkaikar for plaintiff present. And submitted that the connected suit no. 1314/16 is assigned to Court Room No. 07 and he intend to file transfer application.
Hence, Case is adjourned to 10.02.2020 for Steps.
Next Purpose: FOR TAKING STEPS
Next Hearing Date: 10-02-2020
Date: 02-12-2019
Business: Adv. Madkaikar for plaintiff present. And submitted that the connected suit no. 1314/16 is assigned to Court Room No. 07 and he intend to file transfer application.
Hence, Case is adjourned to 10.02.2020 for Steps.
Next Purpose: FOR TAKING STEPS
Next Hearing Date: 10-02-2020
Date: 10-02-2020
Business: Advocate Prashant Karande for Plaintiff present
Advocate Paranjpe for Defendant no.2 present
Court is busy in hearing arguments in respect of Chamber Summons in suit no.5011/08 and other matters as well as court has to hear and dictate order in urgent matters, hence case is adjourned to 27/04/2020.
Next Purpose: FOR TAKING STEPS
Next Hearing Date: 27-04-2020
Date: 27-04-2020
Reason For Adjournment: National Lock Down
Next Purpose: FOR TAKING STEPS
Next Hearing Date: 18-05-2020
Date: 18-05-2020
Business: Covid-19
Lockdown from 23-03-2020
Matter adj. to
Next Purpose: FOR TAKING STEPS
Next Hearing Date: 05-06-2020
Date: 05-06-2020
Business: Case is adjd.to 23.06.20 in view of extension of Lockdown period as per office order no.83/20 dtd.01.06.20
Next Purpose: FOR TAKING STEPS
Next Hearing Date: 23-06-2020
Date: 05-06-2020
Business: Case is adjd.to 23.06.20 in view of extension of Lockdown period as per office order no.83/20 dtd.01.06.20
Next Purpose: FOR TAKING STEPS
Next Hearing Date: 23-06-2020
Date: 23-06-2020
Reason For Adjournment: Adjourned due to Covid-19
Next Purpose: FOR TAKING STEPS
Next Hearing Date: 20-08-2020
Date: 20-08-2020
Business: Case is adjd in view of declaration of Novel Corona Virus (COVID 19)
Next Purpose: FOR TAKING STEPS
Next Hearing Date: 22-10-2020
Date: 22-10-2020
Business: In view of the Standard Operating Procedure laid down by Hon\''ble Bombay High Court vide circulars dtd. 03.06.2020, 05.09.2020, 10.09.2020 in the wake of spread of COVID-19 pandemic the matter is adjourned owing to absence of the parties.
Adjd to 28.01. 2021 for taking steps.
Next Purpose: FOR TAKING STEPS
Next Hearing Date: 28-01-2021
Date: 28-01-2021
Business: Adv. Ajit I/b Adv. Karande for plaintiff present.
Adv. Paranjape for def. no. 2 present.
Heard argument of both sides on NM no. 456/19 and NM No. 1092/19
Adjd to 04.02.2021 for NM Order.
Next Purpose: NM ORDERS
Next Hearing Date: 04-02-2021
Date: 04-02-2021
Business: Adv. Sudam Patil I/b Adv. Karande for plaintiff present.
Adv. Paranjape for defendant present.
Order on NM no. 1092/19
Perused NM, reply filed thereto and heard both sides. The plaintiff\\\''s have prayed to appoint hand writing expert to examine the hand writing on letter (Exh. 14) and letter dtd. 15.12.1983 (Exh. 15). In his reply the defendant no. 2 has stated that in paragraph no. 5 of his written statement (Exh. 2) he has not denied the hand writing but raised the point of interpretation of the documents. From this it is clear that there is no dispute about contents and hand writing of the documents (Exh. 14 and 15). Therefore, no case is made out to refer the documents to hand writing expert. Therefore, NM no. 1092/19 is dismissed.
Nature Of Disposal: DISMISSED
Disposal Date: 04-02-2021Additional Case Details
Additional Case Details
Filing Number: 103033/2019 Filing Date: 13-03-2019 First Hearing Date: 15th April 2019 Decision Date: 04th February 2021 Court Number And Judge: 4-COURT 04 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE
Orders
1Final Order 104 Feb 2021
04 Feb 2021
Order Details: Notice of Motion Pdf Text: Order on NM No. 1092/19 Perused NM, reply filed thereto and heard both sides. The plaintiff's have prayed to appoint hand writing expert to examine the hand writing on letter (Exh. 14) and letter dtd. 15.12.1983 (Exh. 15). In his reply the defendant no. 2 has stated that in paragraph no. 5 of his written statement (Exh. 2) he has not denied the hand writing but raised the point of interpretation of the documents. From this it is clear that there is no dispute about contents and hand writing of the documents (Exh. 14 and 15). Therefore, no case is made out to refer the documents to hand writing expert. Therefore, NM no. 1092/19 is dismissed. -- 1 of 1 --
TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.