Skip to main content
Court Order

Final Order 1

CNR MHCC01002781201912 Mar 2019
City Civil Court, Mumbai
Mumbai · Maharashtra (MH)
Back to Case

Full Order Text

Final Order 1 · 12 Mar 2019 · CNR MHCC010027812019

Order Details: Notice of Motion
Pdf Text: CNR No.
IN THE BOMBAY CITY CIVIL COURT AT BOMBAY
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1074 OF 2019
IN
SUIT NO.1641 OF 2018
M/s. A.R. Constructions ...Plaintiffs.
V/s.
Ramesh Virayya Kurapati ...Defendants.
Appearances:
Ld. Adv Mr.Vinod Desai for plaintiff.
Ld. Adv. Mr.Manohar Mandavkar for defendant
CORAM : HIS HONOUR JUDGE
SHRI ABHIJEET A.
NANDGAONKAR
(C.R.No.20)
DATED : 12th March,2019
ORDER
By way of this notice of motion defendants sought permission to
condone the delay in filing written statement and for permission to file
written statement on record.
2. In supporting affidavit of Mr.Ramesh Virayya Kurapati defendant
have submitted that plaintiff has filed this suit for recovery of the
amount against them in respect of the flat given to them in newly
constructed building under development project, which is pending
before this Court. As per provisions of O.VIII R.1 of C.P.C. defendant
should have filed written statement within 90 days, but due to family
problems, as dispute is going between family, he had to frequently go to
his native place at Warangal, Telangana Sate. Therefore, he unable to
give proper instructions to the counsel to file their written statement
within the period of 90 days. Therefore, he submitted that delay
MHCC01-002781-2019
-- 1 of 3 --
NM 1074/2019 .. 2 .. Suit No.1641/2018
occurred in filing written statement be condoned by setting aside the
order 'without written statement' dt.30.11.2018.
3. Learned counsel appearing for plaintiff on the overleaf of notice
of motion itself filed reply and consented for the prayer subject to costs.
4. Heard learned Advocate for both the sides. Perused the record
and submissions.
5. Considering the reasons mentioned at this initial stage of the suit,
if defendant is permitted to file written statement on record it will
subserve the ends of justice. It will also helpful to take out necessary
defence available to defendant to contest the suit. In absence thereof
they will suffer prejudice, as their right to defend the suit will close
forever. Therefore, for proper and meritorious adjudication of the
matter, it is necessary to permit defendant to file written statement on
record. The delay occurred in filing written statement is already
condoned. In such circumstances, notice of motion deserves to be
allowed. It will be proper to direct the parties to bear their costs.
Hence, I proceed to pass the following order :
ORDER
1. Notice of Motion No.1073 of 2019 in Suit No.1641 of
2018 is made absolute, thereby delay in filing written
statement is condoned and defendant is permitted to
file written statement on record.
2. Parties to bear their costs.
( ABHIJEET A. NANDGAONKAR )
Judge, (C.R.No.20)
Dt.: 12/03/2019 City Civil Court, Gr. MUMBAI
Dictated on : 12.03.2019
Transcribed on : 12.03.2019
Signed on : 12.03.2019
kps/
-- 2 of 3 --
NM 1074/2019 .. 3 .. Suit No.1641/2018
“CERTIFIED TOBE TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF THE ORIGINAL
SIGNED JUDGMENT/ORDER”
13.03.2019 at 11.31 a.m.
UPLOAD DATE AND TIME
(KISHOR PRAKASH SHERWADE)
NAME OF STENOGRAPHER
Name of the Judge HHJ SHRI A.A.
NANDGAONKAR
(COURT ROOM NO.20)
Date of pronouncement of judgment/order 12.03.2019
Judgment/order signed by P.O. on 12.03.2019
Judgment/order uploaded on 13.03.2019
-- 3 of 3 --

TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.