Full Order Text
Final Order 1 · 07 Sept 2018 · CNR MHCC010027542018
Order Details: Chamber summons Pdf Text: CNR No. IN THE BOMBAY CITY CIVIL COURT AT BOMBAY CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.386 OF 2018 IN SUIT NO.3042 OF 2012 CANARA BANK ...Plaintiff V/s. Alokkumar Tony Gupta & ors. ...Defendants. Appearances: Ld. Adv Ms.Hemangi Kamdar for plaintiff. Ld. Adv. Mr.Deshpande for defendant Nos.2 and 3. CORAM : HIS HONOUR JUDGE SHRI ABHIJEET A. NANDGAONKAR (C.R.No.20) DATED : 7th September,2018 ORDER By way of this chamber summons plaintiff prayed for making amendment in the plaint as per schedule to add defendant No.4 in the title clause of plaint. 2. In supporting affidavit Mr.Manish, the Manager of plaintiff, they submitted that, they have filed this suit against defendants for recovery of amount. However, defendant Nos.1 to 3 are the partners of M/s M.Series and they are maintaining the Current Account with plaintiff branch bearing account No.2677201000727 in the name and style as 'M/s. M. Series'. Plaintiff bank is entitled to recover the amount of Rs.2,29,252/ from the defendants as per claim. Therefore, it is necessary to add this M/s M. Series as party defendant in the title clause of plaint for proper adjudication of the matter. The proposed MHCC01-002754-2018 -- 1 of 4 -- CS 386/2018 .. 2 .. Suit No.3042/2012 amendment will not change the nature of suit nor cause prejudice to the defendants. Therefore, they prayed that, as there is no change in the nature of suit and presence of defendant No.4 as per schedule is necessary, the chamber summons be made absolute. 3. None appeared for defendants to oppose the chamber summons in respect of service of chamber summons. Therefore, question of rebuttal on the part of defendant does not arise. 4. It is admitted fact that defendants are partners of M/s M. Series. Therefore, M/s M. Series is the proposed defendant and its presence is necessary for proper and effectual adjudication of the matter. The presence of partnership firm on record will definitely necessary to determine the real question of controversies involved between the parties. Their presence will helpful to decide the matter. The proposed amendment will not change the nature of the suit. The status of the defendant No.4 is a partnership firm, who is represented by defendant Nos.1 to 3, who are already on record. They are having an opportunity to put forth their defence whatever available to them. Therefore, presence of proposed defendant is necessary for proper adjudication of the matter and settle all the questions involved between the parties in this suit. The question of limitation will not arise, so as commencement of trial. Due diligence is shown by plaintiff. As soon as plaintiff came to know that, defendant Nos.1 to 3 are partners of M/s M. Series, the proposed defendant No.4, whose current account in the plaintiffs branch and from whom they have to recover Rs.2,29,252/; they moved this chamber summons. Therefore, it is necessary to make the chamber summons absolute. In the circumstances parties are directed to bear their ow costs and hence, I proceed to pass the following order : -- 2 of 4 -- CS 386/2018 .. 3 .. Suit No.3042/2012 O R D E R 1. Chamber Summons No.386 of 2018 in Suit No.3042 of 2012 is made absolute. 2. Plaintiff to carry out the amendments as per schedule attached to the chamber summons within 14 days from the date of this order. 3. After amendment, amended copy of plaint along with compilation of documents be served upon newly added defendant No.4 by writ of summons. 4. Service affidavit be placed on record to that effect. 5. No order as to costs. ( ABHIJEET A. NANDGAONKAR ) Judge, (C.R.No.20) Dt.:07/09/2018 City Civil Court, Gr. Mumbai Dictated on : 07.09.2018 Transcribed on : 10.09.2018 Signed on : 10.09.2018 kps/ -- 3 of 4 -- CS 386/2018 .. 4 .. Suit No.3042/2012 “CERTIFIED TOBE TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF THE ORIGINAL SIGNED JUDGMENT/ORDER” 10.09.2018 at 1.29 p.m. UPLOAD DATE AND TIME (KISHOR PRAKASH SHERWADE) NAME OF STENOGRAPHER Name of the Judge HHJ SHRI A.A. NANDGAONKAR (COURT ROOM NO.20) Date of pronouncement of judgment/order 07.09.2018 Judgment/order signed by P.O. on 10.09.2018 Judgment/order uploaded on 10.09.2018 -- 4 of 4 --
