Skip to main content
Court Order

Final Order 1

CNR MHCC01002733201927 Mar 2019
City Civil Court, Mumbai
Mumbai · Maharashtra (MH)
Back to Case

Full Order Text

Final Order 1 · 27 Mar 2019 · CNR MHCC010027332019

Order Details: Other
Pdf Text: 27.03.2019
SU 2924/18
@ NM
1048/19 @
NM 4343/18
CORAM: H. H. J. SHRI.M.T.ASIM (CR. NO. 02)
Adv. Naqvi for Plaintiff present.
Adv. Kirti Mehta for Defendant present.
Deft tendered original NM no.1048/19 t.o.r.
Copy given to other side.
Say filed by Adv for Plaintiff on NM.
Order below Notice of motion No.1048/19.
Read notice of motion, affidavit in support of it and reply of Plaintiff.
Defendant has taken out notice of motion making prayer to condone
delay of 72 days occurred in filing written statement and to take
written statement on record. It is contended by defendant that as he
went to attend marriage at Surat so she could not file written
statement within 30 days of her appearance and meanwhile matter
was referred for mediation but mediation failed.
No doubt reasons assigned by the defendant are not extra ordinary.
However, in the interest of justice and fair trial I am of view to
condone delay caused in filing written statement. Moreso, delay
caused is not inordinate and deliberate. She has also annexed written
statement alongwith notice of motion which shows her conduct,
bonafide and she does not want to delay the prosecution of matter.
It is a settled law that Order 8 Rule 1 of CPC is not mandatory and in
specific circumstances the WS can be accepted with reasons. It is also
held that in an adversarial system, no party should be denied an
opportunity in participation of the justice dispensation system (Salem
Bar Association V/s Union of India (2003 AIR SCC 189) and Zolba
V/s Keshav (2008 AIR SCC 2099). Keeping in view above legal
position in the facts of matter I am inclined to condone delay caused
in filing written statement and take written statement of defendant on
record. However, considering the period of delay and conduct of
defendant it is necessary to impose certain costs upon her. Therefore,
pass following order.
ORDER
1. Notice of Motion No.1048 of 2019 is allowed and made absolute in
terms of prayer clauses (a) and (b) subject to payment of costs of
Rs.2,000/- to the Plaintiff within period of two weeks. Defendant is at
liberty to deposit costs payable to Plaintiff in Court.
2. On payment of costs by defendant to Plaintiff, written statement
filed by her be marked exhibit.
Accordingly, NM no.1048/19 is disposed off.
Earlier order to continue till next date.
Adj for NM hearing to 12.06.2019.
Judge
-- 1 of 2 --
-- 2 of 2 --

TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.