Full Order Text
Final Order 1 · 31 Jul 2019 · CNR MHCC010027172019
Order Details: Chamber summons Pdf Text: CH.S.555-19 SUM SUIT NO.762-2018 1 IN THE BOMBAY CITY CIVIL COURT AT BOMBAY CHAMBER SUMMONS NO. 555 OF 2019 IN SUMMARY SUIT NO. 762 OF 2018 (CNR.NO.MHCC010027172019) Navnit Radhakishan Loya ....Plaintiff Versus M/s.Royal Dyers & Anr. ....Defendants CORAM : HIS HONOUR JUDGE SHRI. M.S.LONE (C. R. No.: 28) DATED : 31st July 2019 Advocate Mr.Mahesh Devani for Plaintiff. Advocate Mr.Gupta for Defendants. ORDER This is chamber summons for condonation of delay of 36 days in filing vakalatnama. 2. Heard Ld.counsel for defendants and Ld.counsel for plaintiff. 3. From the material on record following points come for my determination and my findings with reasons are as follows: POINTS FINDINGS 1.Whether there is sufficient cause to condone the delay of 36 days for filing vakalatnama? Yes 2. What order ? As per final order -- 1 of 3 -- CH.S.555-19 SUM SUIT NO.762-2018 2 REASONS AS TO POINT NOS.1 & 2 4. Ld.counel for defendants has submitted that defendant No.2 is proprietor of defendant No.1. On 23/01/2019 defendant No.2 had gone to U.P. to visit his old aged mother. On 03/03/2019 defendant No.2 returned back to Mumbai therefore, there was delay of 36 days to file vakalatnama. 5. This chamber summons is resisted by plaintiff by filing reply. The Ld.advoate for plaintiff has submitted that it was duty of the defendant to explain day to day delay. The defendant has not file any documents to show that he had gone to UP to visit his old ailing mother. Therefore, application be rejected. 6. It is undisputed that there is delay of 36 days in filing vakalatnama. Though defendant has not filed any supporting documents to claim that he had visited to UP but without taking any hyper technical view and to give a fair chance to defendant to further contest the suit point No.1 is answered as 'Yes' and following order is passed. ORDER 1. Chamber summons No.555/2019 is allowed. 2. The delay of 36 days to file vakalatnama by defendants is condoned subject to cost of Rs.3,000/(Rs.Three Thousand only) to be paid to the plaintiff. -- 2 of 3 -- CH.S.555-19 SUM SUIT NO.762-2018 3 3. On payment of cost vakalatnama shall be taken on record. 4. Chamber summon No.555/2019 is disposed of accordingly. (M.S.LONE) Judge, Date:31/07/2019 City Civil Court,Gr. Bombay Dictated on : 31/07/2019 Transcribed on : 01/08/2019 Signed on : 19/08/2019 CERTIFIED TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF THE ORIGINAL SIGNED JUDGMENT/ORDER.” 17/09/2019 at 1.30p.m. Mrs.J.V.Pawar UPLOAD DATE AND TIME NAME OF STENOGRAPHER Name of the Judge (With Court Room No.) HHJ Shri.M.S.Lone (C.R.NO.28) Date of pronouncement of Judgment/Order 31/07/2019 Judgment/Order signed by P.O. on 19/08/2019 Judgment/Order uploaded on 17/09/2019 -- 3 of 3 --
