Skip to main content
EXECUTION APPLN

SUNITA ANAND SHINDEVsShashikant Tulshiram Honkate

CNR MHCC010026962020966-IC REGISTRAR CITY CIVIL COURT MUMBAI
City Civil Court, Mumbai
Mumbai · Maharashtra (MH)
CASE DISPOSED
Uncontested--ALLOWED
Decision Date: 04th December 2021

TrustJury record updated 28 Sept 2026

Case Overview

Registration Number
100160/2020
Registration Date
29 Feb 2020

Advocates

1

For Petitioner

For Respondent

    Not available

    Parties

    2

    Petitioner

    1. 1SUNITA ANAND SHINDE

    Respondent

    1. 1Shashikant Tulshiram Honkate

    Acts & Sections

    1
    Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Land (Vidarbha Region and Kutch Area) Act · Sec warrant

    Case History / Proceedings

    Case History
    Date: 13-03-2020
Business: Shri Rajesh Patil, Advocate for Plaintiff present.
On request of Shri. Patil, for taking further steps, adjd to 14/03/2020.
Next Purpose: FOR___________________
Next Hearing Date: 14-03-2020

Date: 14-03-2020
Business: Shri. Rajesh Patil, Advocate for Plaintiff present.  Shri Patil prays for issue of Warrant u/o.XXI, Rule 46  of CPC, without issue of notice, stating that the present Execution Application is in continuation of earlier exe.application no.351/2016, wherein warrant u/o.XXI Rule 48 of CPC, had been issued and the defendant has now  retired from service.
Hence, issue warrants as prayed for, returnable on 16/06/2020.
Next Purpose: FOR___________________
Next Hearing Date: 16-06-2020

Date: 16-06-2020
Next Purpose: FOR___________________
Next Hearing Date: 29-07-2020

Date: 29-07-2020
Reason For Adjournment: Adjourned due to Covid-19
Next Purpose: FOR___________________
Next Hearing Date: 22-09-2020

Date: 22-09-2020
Reason For Adjournment: Adjourned due to Covid-19
Next Purpose: FOR___________________
Next Hearing Date: 03-11-2020

Date: 03-11-2020
Reason For Adjournment: Adjourned due to Covid-19
Next Purpose: FOR___________________
Next Hearing Date: 18-12-2020

Date: 18-12-2020
Business: Shri Rajesh Patil, Advocate for plaintiff present.
On request of Shri Patil, adjourned to 23/02/2021, by extending the returnable date of warrant.
Next Purpose: FOR___________________
Next Hearing Date: 23-02-2021

Date: 23-02-2021
Business: Shri Rajesh Patil advocate for plaintiff present.
On request Shri Patil for taking instructions matter adjourned to 06/03/2021.
Next Purpose: FOR___________________
Next Hearing Date: 06-03-2021

Date: 06-03-2021
Business: Shri Rajesh Patil, Advocate for Plaintiff present.
On request of Shri Patil for instruction adjourned to 30/03/2021.
Next Purpose: FOR___________________
Next Hearing Date: 30-03-2021

Date: 30-03-2021
Business: Parties and advocate are absent adjourned to  26/04/2021.
Next Purpose: FOR___________________
Next Hearing Date: 26-04-2021

Date: 26-04-2021
Business: In view of directions vide Office Order No.81 of 2021, matter adjourned to 20/07/2021.
Next Purpose: FOR___________________
Next Hearing Date: 20-07-2021

Date: 20-07-2021
Business: In view of directions vide Office Order No.131 of 2021, matter adjourned to 20/09/2021.
Next Purpose: FOR___________________
Next Hearing Date: 20-09-2021

Date: 20-09-2021
Business: Shri Rajesh Patil, Advocate for plaintiff present.
On request of Shri Patil for taking instructions, adjourned to 15/11/2021, by way of last chance.
Next Purpose: FOR___________________
Next Hearing Date: 15-11-2021

Date: 15-11-2021
Business: As Court is on leave, board discharged and matter adjourned to 04/12/2021.
Next Purpose: FOR___________________
Next Hearing Date: 04-12-2021

Date: 04-12-2021
Business: Shri. Rajesh Patil, advocate for plaintiff present. Shri. Patil states that as the warrant u/o.XXI Rule 46 in the matter has been issued on 08-02-2021, appropriate orders may be passed. In view of this present Execution Application stands disposed off. It is made clear that though the Exe.Application is marked as disposed off, warrant issued in the matter will remain alive and the employer of the defendant to comply with the warrant till full satisfaction of Decree subject to provisions of Section 60 of CPC. Plaintiff will be at liberty to apply for Registrars Certificate and Payment Order from time to time till full satisfaction of Decree. Office of Sheriff of Mumbai to furnish certificate/report in respect of warrant of attachment every six months. Plaintiff is at liberty to take out Garnishee Proceedings, if necessary. Plaintiff is also at liberty to file fresh Exe.Application for the residual amount, if Decree is not satisfied within 12 years. Plaintiff shall apply for marking the Decree as fully satisfied upon receipt of entire decretal amount. Office of the Sheriff of Mumbai to act on the certified copy of this Order.
Nature Of Disposal: ALLOWED
Disposal Date: 04-12-2021

    Additional Case Details

    Additional Case Details
    Filing Number: 102765/2020
Filing Date: 29-02-2020
First Hearing Date: 13th March 2020
Decision Date: 04th December 2021
Court Number And Judge: 966-IC REGISTRAR CITY CIVIL COURT MUMBAI

    Orders

    0

    No order text is available in this record.

    TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.