Skip to main content
EXECUTION APPLN

Akshar Rameshkumar Jain Summ. Suit No. 1644 of 2011VsSUNIL DATTATRAY PATIL AND ANR.

CNR MHCC01002669201928-COURT 28 ADD SESSIONS JUDGE
City Civil Court, Mumbai
Mumbai · Maharashtra (MH)
CASE DISPOSED
Uncontested--OTHER
Decision Date: 12th December 2019

TrustJury record updated 19 Sept 2026

Case Overview

Registration Number
100198/2014
Registration Date
03 Apr 2014

Advocates

1

For Petitioner

For Respondent

    Not available

    Parties

    2

    Petitioner

    1. 1Akshar Rameshkumar Jain Summ. Suit No. 1644 of 2011

    Respondent

    1. 1SUNIL DATTATRAY PATIL AND ANR.

    Acts & Sections

    1
    Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Land (Vidarbha Region and Kutch Area) Act · Sec NOTICE

    Case History / Proceedings

    Case History
    Date: 08-03-2019

Date: 10-04-2019
Business: Adv for DH Mr.B.S. Patil present
Matter is Adjd for Steps to 22/07/2019
Next Purpose: FOR TAKING STEPS
Next Hearing Date: 22-07-2019

Date: 22-07-2019
Business: Adv. Balbheem patil for DH present.
None for JD.
Writ of summons of service granishee notice tender by adv. for DH.
Taken on record.
The assistenace General Manager of RBI has written letter to this court to intimate exat amount payable to DH.
The LD adv. for DH.
Made staytement across the bar that if the amount of Rupees . 26,675/- is recover than the decree will be fully satisfide.
Accordingly the  RBI is to intimate that amount of Rs. 26,675/- is tobe recovered.
DH to setps accrodingly.
Adjd for compliance on 26/8/2019.
Reason For Adjournment: court time is over
Next Purpose: COMPLIANCE
Next Hearing Date: 26-08-2019

Date: 26-08-2019
Business: Representative of plaintiff present.
On oral request Adjd for compliance on 15/10/2019.
Next Purpose: COMPLIANCE
Next Hearing Date: 15-10-2019

Date: 15-10-2019
Business: PO is on leave
Next Purpose: COMPLIANCE
Next Hearing Date: 12-12-2019

Date: 12-12-2019
Business: Adv. B. S. Patil present for the plff.
None present for the Deft.
Ld counsel DH filed application stating that the decree is fully satisfied. t.o.r.
Order- Seen. be kept on record.
In view of submission of the plff/DH that the decree is fully satisfied, the execution application is disposed as decree is fully satisfied.
Nature Of Disposal: OTHER
Disposal Date: 12-12-2019

    Additional Case Details

    Additional Case Details
    Filing Number: 102867/2019
Filing Date: 03-04-2014
First Hearing Date: 08th March 2019
Decision Date: 12th December 2019
Court Number And Judge: 28-COURT 28 ADD SESSIONS JUDGE

    Orders

    1
    Final Order 1
    12 Dec 2019
    Order Details: Other
Pdf Text: Back
Daily Status
IN THE COURT OF :COURT 28 ADD SESSIONS JUDGE
Case No. :EXECUTION APPLN/0100198/2014
Akshar Rameshkumar Jain Summ. Suit No. 1644 of 2011 Vs Sunil Dattatray Patil and Anr.
Date : 12-12-2019
Business : Adv. B. S. Patil present for the plff. None present for the
Deft. Ld counsel DH filed application stating that the
decree is fully satisfied. t.o.r. Order- Seen. be kept on
record. In view of submission of the plff/DH that the decree
is fully satisfied, the execution application is disposed as
decree is fully satisfied.
Nature of Disposal : OTHER
Disposal Date : 12-12-2019
COURT 28 ADD SESSIONS JUDGE
-- 1 of 1 --

    TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.