Skip to main content
SUIT - SHORT CAUSE CIVIL SUIT

Mr. Vishal Jayantilal JainVsM/s. Victoria Iron and Metal Warehousing Private Limited

CNR MHCC0100264220192-COURT 02 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE
City Civil Court, Mumbai
Mumbai · Maharashtra (MH)
CASE DISPOSED
Uncontested--CONSENT DECREE
Decision Date: 03rd December 2019

TrustJury record updated 19 Sept 2026

Case Overview

Registration Number
100594/2019
Registration Date
05 Mar 2019

Advocates

1

For Petitioner

For Respondent

    Not available

    Parties

    2

    Petitioner

    1. 1Mr. Vishal Jayantilal Jain

    Respondent

    1. 1M/s. Victoria Iron and Metal Warehousing Private Limited

    Acts & Sections

    1
    Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act · Sec Order 39

    Case History / Proceedings

    Case History
    Date: 11-03-2019
Business: By Preceipe.
Adv. Patil for plaintiff present and tendered draft NM
Leave is granted
Issue of writ of summons on defendant for settlement of issues and filing written statement on payment of process fee.
Already adjourned to 26.03.2019.
Next Purpose: SERVICE
Next Hearing Date: 26-03-2019

Date: 26-03-2019
Business: Adv. Patil for Plaintiff present.
He tendered original NM No.1111/19 t.o.r.
Adj for affidavit of service to 15.06.2019.
Next Purpose: SERVICE
Next Hearing Date: 15-06-2019

Date: 15-06-2019
Business: Adv. Patil for Plaintiff present.
Ex.2 Adv. Ms.Ami filed V/n for defendant t.o.r.
Adv for defendant sought time to file reply.
Time is granted.
Adj for NM reply to 13.08.2019.
Next Purpose: NM REPLYREJOINDER
Next Hearing Date: 08-07-2019

Date: 08-07-2019
Business: By Precipe.
Adv. Patil for Plaintiff present.
He filed common pursis for placing this matter and nine other matters before Lok Adalalt t.o.r.
Hence, matter be referred to Lok Adalat.
Adv for Plaintiff submitted that he will intimate other party to remain present before Lok Adalat on 13.07.2019.
Already adj to 13.08.2019.
Next Purpose: NM REPLYREJOINDER
Next Hearing Date: 13-08-2019

Date: 13-08-2019
Business: Adv. Pooja Jain for Plaintiff present.
Deft and Adv absent.
Adj for reply as last chance to 21.09.2019.
Next Purpose: NM REPLYREJOINDER
Next Hearing Date: 21-09-2019

Date: 21-09-2019
Business: Adv. Patil for plaintiff present
Adv. Viraj Bansode for defendant present.
With concerned with both parties.
Matter is adjd. NM reply to 5.10.2019.
Next Purpose: NM REPLYREJOINDER
Next Hearing Date: 05-10-2019

Date: 05-10-2019
Business: Adv. Patil  for Plaintiff present.
Adv. Saurav Uttangale for defendant present.
As court is busy in passing judgment.
Adjd. to 7.11.2019 for NM reply
Next Purpose: NM REPLYREJOINDER
Next Hearing Date: 07-11-2019

Date: 07-11-2019
Business: Adv. Patil for plaintiff present.
Adv. Saurabh Utangale for defendant present.
Adjourned for NM Reply to 29.11.2019.
Next Purpose: NM REPLYREJOINDER
Next Hearing Date: 29-11-2019

Date: 29-11-2019
Business: Adv. Patil for plaintiff present.
Adv. Saurav Utangale for defendant present.
Adjourned for consent term to 3.12.2019.
Next Purpose: CONSENT TERM
Next Hearing Date: 03-12-2019

Date: 03-12-2019
Business: Adv. Patil for plaintiff present.
Adv. Saurav Uttangale I/b adv. Tushar Goradia for defendant present.
Plaintiff present.
Mr. Rahul Ramesh Shah director of defendant present.
Ex 3 Consent Term filed by both parties.
Verified plaintiff and director of defendant Rahul Ramesh Shah.
They voluntarily agree terms contained in Exh.3.  I perused Exh.3 para 2 to 4 of the same state about background history of litigation which cannot form part of Consent Decree, so I exclude those terms while passing order.
Hence, pass following order
                          ORDER BELOW Exh.1
  1. Suit is decreed in terms para 1, 5 to 34 of Consent terms Exh.3.
2. Court fee if any as per Rule be  refunded to the plaintiffs.
3. Decree be drawn up accordingly.
4. In above terms suit stands disposed of.

       ORDER BELOW NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1111 OF 2019
Present N/M is taken out in Suit No.594 of 19 which is disposed of in view of above order.  Therefore, N/M stands dismissed for want of prosecution.
                                                                                      Judge
Nature Of Disposal: CONSENT DECREE
Disposal Date: 03-12-2019

    Additional Case Details

    Additional Case Details
    Filing Number: 102568/2019
Filing Date: 28-02-2019
First Hearing Date: 11th March 2019
Decision Date: 03rd December 2019
Court Number And Judge: 2-COURT 02 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE

    Orders

    1
    Final Order 1
    03 Dec 2019
    Order Details: Other
Pdf Text: 3.12.2019
SU 594/19
NM 1111/19
Exh.3
CORAM: H. H. J. SHRI.M.T.ASIM (CR. NO. 02)
Adv. Patil for plaintiff present.
Adv. Saurav Uttangale I/b adv. Tushar Goradia for defendant present.
Plaintiff present.
Mr. Rahul Ramesh Shah director of defendant present.
Ex 3 Consent Term filed by both parties.
Verified plaintiff and director of defendant Rahul Ramesh Shah.
They voluntarily agree terms contained in Exh.3. I perused Exh.3
para 2 to 4 of the same state about background history of litigation
which cannot form part of Consent Decree, so I exclude those terms
while passing order.
Hence, pass following order:
ORDER BELOW Exh.1
1. Suit is decreed in terms para 1, 5 to 34 of Consent terms Exh.3.
2. Court fee if any as per Rule be refunded to the plaintiffs.
3. Decree be drawn up accordingly.
4. In above terms suit stands disposed of.
ORDER BELOW NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1111 OF 2019
Present N/M is taken out in Suit No.594 of 19 which is disposed of in
view of above order. Therefore, N/M stands dismissed for want of
prosecution.
Judge
-- 1 of 1 --

    TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.