Full Order Text
Final Order 1 · 25 Jul 2022 · CNR MHCC010026232019
Order Details: Notice of Motion Pdf Text: ..1.. IN THE BOMBAY CITY CIVIL COURT FOR GREATER MUMBAI NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1007 OF 2019 (CNR NO.MHCC010026232019) IN S. C. SUIT NO.1835 OF 2017 Shanti Madangopal Poddar & others )..Plaintiffs V/s. Vinod Shrikrishan Poddar & others ).. Defendants Appearances : Adv. P. D. Gandhy & Associates for plaintiff. Adv. DS Law Bureau for defendant No.1. Adv. M/s. Mansukhlal Hiralal & Co. for defendant No.2 to 7. CORAM : HIS HONOUR JUDGE SHAIKH AKBAR SHAIKH JAFAR COURT ROOM NO.03 DATE : 25/07/2022. ORDER 1. This Notice of Motion is taken out by the plaintiffs for directing the defendants to disclose on oath all the documents in respect of the suit property executed by them after filing of the suit and for appointment of commissioner. 2. It is the contention of the plaintiff that by an Order dated 05/03/2018, this Court has directed the defendants to maintain status quo. The copy of said order of status quo has served upon the society where the -- 1 of 4 -- ..2.. flat is situated and the Police Officers of concerned Police Station. However, he has apprehension that defendants might have executed some documents in respect of the suit property after filing of the suit. Therefore, he called upon the defendants for disclosing the documents. 3. In response to the notice, defendant No.1 appeared, filed his AffidavitinReply and contended that due to his poor health and severe depression, he gifted the suit premises to his son Vivek Poddar, who has inducted to Chhajed Vivek Mukeshkumar vide Leave & License Agreement and lastly, prayed for dismissal of the notice of motion with costs. 4. Heard the rival parties. It is the contention of plaintiff that defendant No.1 should disclose execution of all the documents to which the Ld. Advocate for defendant No.1 replied that they have already disclosed the transfer of property by way of gift to his son and execution of Leave & License Agreement in respect of suit property. Therefore, prayer clause (a) got automatically satisfied. 5. So far as appointment of commissioner is concerned, the Ld. Advocate for plaintiff has submitted that in view of execution of Leave & License, now, there is no need to appoint the commissioner. The status of suit property has already come on record. Considering the rival submission, I am of the view that the notice of motion deserves to be disposed off as prayer clause (a) is satisfied and other are becoming infructuous. With this, I proceed to pass the following order : ORDER 1. Notice of Motion No.1007/2019 in Suit No.1835/2017, is hereby dismissed in terms of observation made above. -- 2 of 4 -- ..3.. 2. Notice of Motion stands disposed off accordingly. (Order dictated & pronounced in open Court) (Shaikh Akbar Shaikh Jafar) Judge, City Civil Court, C.R. No.03 Dated : 25/07/2022 Greater Bombay Dictated on : 25/07/2022 Typed on : 26/07/2022 Signed on : -- 3 of 4 -- ..4.. “Certified to be true and correct copy of the original signed order”. 28/07/2022 (Mrs. Vidya Abhijit Mande) at about 05.00 p.m. Stenographer (GradeI.) Court Room No.03, Gr. Mumbai Name of the Hon'ble Judge : Shaikh Akbar Shaikh Jafar, Judge, City Civil Court & Addl. Sessions Judge Court Room No.03, Gr. Mumbai Date of pronouncement of Order : 25/07/2022 Order signed by Hon'ble Judge on : 26/07/2022 Order uploaded on : 28/07/2022 at about 05.00 p.m. -- 4 of 4 --
