EXECUTION APPLN
SANTOSH NAGURAO GADGEVsAARTI AMIT JADHAV
CNR MHCC010026222018966-IC REGISTRAR CITY CIVIL COURT MUMBAI
City Civil Court, Mumbai
Mumbai · Maharashtra (MH)
CASE DISPOSED
Uncontested--ALLOWED
Decision Date: 16th November 2018
TrustJury record updated 09 Sept 2026
Case Overview
- Registration Number
- 100058/2018
- Registration Date
- 20 Feb 2018
Advocates
1For Petitioner
For Respondent
Not available
Parties
2Petitioner
Respondent
Acts & Sections
1Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Land (Vidarbha Region and Kutch Area) Act · Sec NOTICE
Case History / Proceedings
Case History
Date: 15-03-2018 Business: Mr. Balbheem Patil, Advocate for Plaintiff, present. Mr. Patil requests to issue Notice u/o. XXI Rule 22 of CPC. Hence, issue notice as prayed, returnable on 10/04/2018. Next Purpose: FOR___________________ Next Hearing Date: 10-04-2018 Date: 10-04-2018 Business: Shri Balbheem Patil, Advocate for Plaintiff present. On request of Shri Patil for filing service report Adjd to 04.05.2018. Next Purpose: FOR___________________ Next Hearing Date: 04-05-2018 Date: 04-05-2018 Business: Mr.Balbheem Patil Advocate for Plaintiff present. Exe. Application marked as Exhibit -A Colly. Orignal Notice under order XXI Rule 22 and the affidavit of service dated 02/05/2018, tendered by Shri. Patil, taken on record and marked as Exhibit -B and Exhibit - C, respectively. As despite service no appearance is filed by defendant Shri. Patil prays for issue of warrants under order 48 and 46 of CPC. Hence issue warrants as prayed for returnable on 04/08/2018 Next Purpose: FOR___________________ Next Hearing Date: 04-08-2018 Date: 04-08-2018 Business: Parties and Advocate absent, adjd to 26/09/2018. Next Purpose: FOR___________________ Next Hearing Date: 26-09-2018 Date: 26-09-2018 Business: Mr. Balbheem Patil, Advocate for Plaintiff, present. On request of Mr. Patil, adjd to 16/11/2018. Next Purpose: FOR___________________ Next Hearing Date: 16-11-2018 Date: 16-11-2018 Business: Mr. Balbheem Patil, Advocate for Plaintiff, present. Mr. Patil states that warrants u/o.XXI Rule 46 and 48 in the matter have been issued on 04/05/2018 and some amount has been received in the office of Sheriff of Mumbai. In view of this present Execution Application stands disposed off. It is made clear that though the Exe.Application is marked as disposed off, warrant issued in the matter will remain alive and the employer of the defendant to comply with the warrant till full satisfaction of Decree subject to provisions of Section 60 of CPC. Plaintiff will be at liberty to apply for Registrars Certificate and Payment Order from time to time till full satisfaction of Decree. Office of Sheriff of Mumbai to furnish certificate/report in respect of warrant of attachment every six months. Plaintiff is at liberty to take out Garnishee Proceedings, if necessary. Plaintiff is also at liberty to file fresh Exe.Application for the residual amount, if Decree is not satisfied within 12 years. Plaintiff shall apply for marking the Decree as fully satisfied upon receipt of entire decretal amount. Office of the Sheriff of Mumbai to act on the certified copy of this Order. Nature Of Disposal: ALLOWED Disposal Date: 16-11-2018
Additional Case Details
Additional Case Details
Filing Number: 102751/2018 Filing Date: 20-02-2018 First Hearing Date: 15th March 2018 Decision Date: 16th November 2018 Court Number And Judge: 966-IC REGISTRAR CITY CIVIL COURT MUMBAI
Orders
0No order text is available in this record.
TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.
