Full Order Text
Interim Order 2 · 01 Apr 2023 · CNR MHCC010026052019
Order Details: Order below exhibit Pdf Text: ORDER ..1.. MHCC010026052019 IN THE CITY CIVIL COURT FOR GREATER MUMBAI ORDER BELOW EXH. 7 IN SUIT NO.591 OF 2019 Vijayraj Chettiar. ...Plaintiff. Vs. Niyam Bhasin & Anr., … Defendants. Appearance: Adv. J. M. Shah i/b Adv. Waquar Ahmed for plaintiff. Adv. Pratip Pai for defendant no.2. Adv. J. M. Shah i/b Adv. Waquar Ahmed for plaintiff. CORAM : HIS HONOUR JUDGE R.R.Patare COURT NO.2 DATED : 1st April, 2023. ORAL ORDER This application is filed on behalf of defendant no.1 seeking direction for filing vakalatnama by the advocate who is appearing in the suit. The defendant no.1 also filed notes of arguments. The application Exh.7 is opposed on behalf of plaintiff by filing reply. Perused application, reply and heard both the parties. The defendant no.1 party in person has objected appearance of advocate Shah on the ground that he is not having authority to appear and argue notice of motion on behalf of plaintiff. He further pointed out that advocate on record never remain present before the Court. The defendant no.1 party in person made reference to the advocate acts the rules framed the Bar Counsel of -- 1 of 4 -- ORDER ..2.. India and tried to demonstrate that Adv. Shah cannot appear and conduct the suit on behalf of plaintiff. On the other hand, the learned advocate appearing for plaintiff would submit that application Exh.7 is without merit. He requested for dismissal of application. The learned advocate also relied on the case of Jayant Madhav Chitale vs. Garware Wall Ropes Ltd. And others. reported in 1997(1) Mh.L.J. 261 wherein it is observed in para no.7 as under :- 7. The relevant provision for the present purpose is sub-rule (5) of Rule 4 of Order III. According to it no pleader who has been engaged for the purpose of pleading only is permitted to plead on behalf of any party unless he has filed in Court a memo of appearance signed by him and stating the names of the parties to the suit, the name of the party for whom he appears, and the name of the person by whom he is authorized to appear. The proviso to this provision carves out an exception. If a party appoints a pleader to act on his behalf in the Court and such duly appointed pleader engages another pleader to plead on behalf of that party then another pleader is not required to file memo of appearance as contemplated in the main provision of sub-rule (4) of Rule 5 of Order III. In other words, whenever a pleader who has been duly appointed to act in Court on behalf of a party engages any other pleader to plead on behalf of such party, such other pleader is not required to file memo of appearance. The Court in such circumstances cannot insist the other pleader to file memo of appearance. (An authority given by advocate who is duly appointed by a party to act and plead on his behalf to another advocate to plead on behalf of such party does not need memo of appearance to be filed by another advocate. It was expected of the trial Court to have kept the said provision in mind. 2. On perusal of the Judgment of Hon’ble High Court it is settled that there is no bar to pleader duly authorize by party under a vakalatnama to engage any pleader to plead the case on his or her behalf. There is evidence on record to suggest that advocate Shah is engaged to conduct the suit by advocate on record. There is no merit in the application Exh.7. Hence deserves to be rejected. In the result following order is passed. -- 2 of 4 -- ORDER ..3.. ORDER. Application Exh.7 stands rejected with no order as to costs. (R.R. Patare) Judge City Civil Court, Gr.Mumbai Date : 01.04.2023 Typed on : 01.04.2023 HHJ signed on : 01.04.2023 -- 3 of 4 -- ORDER ..4.. “CERTIFIED TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF THE ORIGINAL SIGNED JUDGMENT/ORDER.” DATED 01.04.2023, 5.30 p.m. UPLOAD DATE AND TIME Mrs. V. N. Rajgole. NAME OF STENOGRAPHER Name of the Judge (With Court Room No.) H.H.J. Shri. R.R. Patare. C.R.No.02 Date of Pronouncement of JUDGMENT/ORDER 01.04.2023 JUDGMENT/ORDER signed by P.O. on 01.04.2023 JUDGMENT/ORDER uploaded on 01.04.2023 -- 4 of 4 --
