Date: 21-02-2018
Business: Resumed.
Adv. B. Holambe Patil for plaintiff, Adv. Chandramore for BMC are present.
Adv. Chandramore seeks time to file reply. Granted as last chance.
Adjd. for reply and argument on NM to 26.02.2018.
Next Purpose: REPLY
Next Hearing Date: 26-02-2018
Date: 26-02-2018
Business: Resumed.
The P.O. is busy in orders on NM No. 4296/2016 in Suit No. 1000/2016 and NM No. 744/2018 in Suit No. 2511/2016 for want of time the board is discharged.
Adjd. for reply to 07.03.2018.
Next Purpose: REPLY
Next Hearing Date: 07-03-2018
Date: 07-03-2018
Business: Resumed.
Adv. Chandramore for BMC and Def.No. 2 in person are present.
Adv. Holambe Patil for plaintiff tender registered NM no. 698/2018.
Def. No. 2 in person files affidavit in reply to NM. O - R and R. He submits that he will defend the suit and NM on his own accord. His statement is taken on record. He serves copies of reply to the plaintiff and def. no. 1. Adv. Chandramore seeks time to file reply to NM. Granted as last chance.
Adjd. for reply to NM No. 698/2018 to 16.03.2018.
Next Purpose: REPLY
Next Hearing Date: 16-03-2018
Date: 16-03-2018
Business: Resumed.
Adv. Holambe Patil for plaintiff and Adv. Chandramore for BMC, Def. No. 2 in person are present.
Adv. Patil seeks time to argue NM. Time is granted.
Adjd. for NM arguments to 02.04.2018.
Next Purpose: NM ARGUMENTS
Next Hearing Date: 02-04-2018
Date: 02-04-2018
Business: Resumed.
Adv. Bapu Holambe Patil for plaintiff, Adv. Chandramore for BMC and Def. No. 2 in person. After making some submission on NM No. 698/2018, Adv. Patil submitted that the paging is not properly done and some documents are missing. He is directed to verify the plaint and documents and carry out corrections in paging if necessary. The defendant nos. 1 and 2 are also directed to get their compilations corrected. Time is granted as last chance to complete the arguments. He is permitted to verify his documents with the compilation on record on any working day during office hours in the presence of Sheristedar/interpreter.
Adjd. for arguments on NM to 23.04.2018.
Next Purpose: NM ARGUMENTS
Next Hearing Date: 23-04-2018
Date: 23-04-2018
Business: Resumed.
The .P.O. is busy in passing orders in NM No. 87/2017 and 3774/2017.
Adjd. for NM arguments to 13.06.2018.
Next Purpose: NM ARGUMENTS
Next Hearing Date: 13-06-2018
Date: 13-06-2018
Business: Resumed.
Adv. For plaintiff and Adv. For MCGM are present.
Adv. For plaintiff filed list of documents. TOR
The P.O. is busy in judgment of Suit No. 7115 of 2001. For want of time the board is discharged.
Adjd for NM arguments to 27.06.2018.
Next Purpose: NM ARGUMENTS
Next Hearing Date: 27-06-2018
Date: 27-06-2018
Business: Resumed.
The P.O. is busy in hearing of Suit No. 2511 of 2016 and other ad-interim reliefs matter and judgment in sessions Case No. 2 of 2018. for want of time the board is discharged.
Adjd for NM arguments to 08.08.2018.
Next Purpose: NM ARGUMENTS
Next Hearing Date: 08-08-2018
Date: 08-08-2018
Business: Resumed.
The P.O. is on leave.
Adjd for NM arguments to 13.08.2018.
Next Purpose: NM ARGUMENTS
Next Hearing Date: 13-08-2018
Date: 13-08-2018
Business: Resumed.
The P.O. is busy in recording evidence in Sessions Case No. 568/2017 and 260/2017. For want of time the board is discharged.
Adjd for NM arguments to 29.08.2018
Next Purpose: NM ARGUMENTS
Next Hearing Date: 29-08-2018
Date: 29-08-2018
Business: Resumed.
Heard, Adv. Holambe for plaintiff, Def. no. 2 in person and Adv. Patil for MCGM on NM No. 698/2018.
Adjd for orders on NM to 01.09.2018.
Next Purpose: NM ORDERS
Next Hearing Date: 01-09-2018
Date: 01-09-2018
Business: Resumed.
Adv. Holambe for plaintiff is present. None for defendants.
The P.O. is busy in recording evidence in sessions Case No. 329/2018 and 231/2018.
Adjd for orders on NM 698/2018 to 03.09.2018.
Next Purpose: NM ORDERS
Next Hearing Date: 03-09-2018
Date: 03-09-2018
Business: Resumed.
Mr. B. V. Holambe Patil for plaintiff and Adv. Mr. Patil for defendant are present
F.R.S.R. following order is passed on N/M no. 698/18
ORDER
1. The Notice of Motion no. 698 of 2018 is made absolute by restraining the defendants from interfering with or disturbing the permitted trade activity in the suit shop till the decision of the suit.
2. The defendant no. 1 is directed to decide the issue relating to cancellation of order of revocation and renewal of trade license of the plaintiff on or before 03.10.2018, by adopting due process of law.
3. Liberty to mention the matter after passing necessary orders by the defendant Corporation.
4. Parties to bear their own costs of the motion.
5. An ordinary copy of this order duly authenticated by the Sheristedar of this court be supplied to respective parties.
Matter is adjd to 03.10.2018 for written statement
Nature Of Disposal: ALLOWED
Disposal Date: 03-09-2018