Full Order Text
Final Order 1 · 20 Dec 2021 · CNR MHCC010025152019
Order Details: Ex-parte Judgement Pdf Text: Comm.Suit No. 15/19. 1 Ex-parte Judgment (Exh.20). MHCC010025152019 Presented on : 05-03-2019 Registered on : 04-05-2019 Decided on : 20-12-2021 Duration : 2 years, 9 months, 15 days IN THE BOMBAY CITY CIVIL COURT AT BOMBAY. COMMERCIAL SUIT NO. 15 OF 2019 Exh.20. Mr. Haresh N. Chawda, ) India Inhabitant, aged 49 ) Occ. Business, having address ) at Ahmed Building, 2nd floor, ) R. No. 15, Patha Bapurao Marg, ) Opp. Gokul Hotel, ) Mumbai 400 004 )...Plaintiff Versus 1. M/s. Rupji Constructions, ) C36, Shree Ram Industrial Estate, ) 3rd floor, G.D. Ambedkar Marg, ) Wadala, Mumbai 400031 ) 2. Mr. Madhukar Magasham Rupji, ) Partner of M/s Rupji Constructions, ) Aged 78 years, Occu. Business, ) Residing at 203, AWing, 2 nd Floor, ) Om Residency, Opp. Bhoiwada, Court, ) Mumbai – 400 012 ) 3. Mr. Tejal Madhukar Rupji, ) Partner of M/s Rupji Constructions, ) Aged 46 years, Occu. Business, ) Residing at 203, AWing, 2 nd Floor, ) Om Residency, Opp. Bhoiwada, Court, ) Mumbai – 400 012 ) -- 1 of 6 -- Comm.Suit No. 15/19. 2 Ex-parte Judgment (Exh.20). Defendant nos.2 and 3 both are presently ) residing at ) Abhay Cooperative Housing Society Ltd., ) Plot No. 81, B404, Pipeline Road, ) Tilak Nagar, Above Nobel Chemist, ) Chembur, Mumbai400089 )...Defendants SUIT FOR RECOVERY OF MONEY CORAM : HIS HONOUR JUDGE SHRI R.R.BHAGWAT. (COURT ROOM NO.31). DATE : 20th DECEMBER, 2021. Shri Suraj Gupte, Advocate for the plaintiff. Defendants – (Exparte). JUDGMENT (EXPARTE) 1. This is suit for recovery of money. 2. Case of the plaintiff, in brief, is as under : The plaintiff is running a business of civil contractor under the name and style of 'Haresh Chawda Civil Contractors'. Defendant no.1 is a partnership firm and defendants no.2 and 3 are the partners of defendant no.1. The defendants are builders and developers. The defendant approached the plaintiff for civil / labour work at their ongoing construction sites at various places in Mumbai and suburban area. The plaintiff had given the labour work quotations for fixing tiling etc. on 18/04/2010, 05/12/2012 and 01/05/2014. After going through the quotations, the defendants offered the tiling work and general work to the plaintiff. Accordingly, the plaintiff carried out the work at various sites mentioned in para 6 of the plaint. Then, he raised bills of Rs.61,62,253.81 till 2015. The plaintiff persuaded the defendant for payment, but in vain. He approached the -- 2 of 6 -- Comm.Suit No. 15/19. 3 Ex-parte Judgment (Exh.20). police station to make complaint of the defendant. API asked the plaintiff to file a civil suit. Then, advocate for the plaintiff sent demand notice dated 29/01/2019 to the defendants for payment of outstanding dues with interest at the rate of 18% plus GST. The packets containing notice returned with remark 'Intimation' dated 21/01/2019. Hence, the plaintiff filed the suit for recovery of outstanding amount of Rs.61,62,253.81 with interest at the rate of 18% p.a. from 01/09/2015 to 31/01/2019 with service tax / GST at 18% p.a. He also claimed further interest at the rate of 18% p.a. with costs of the suit. He further made prayer for sale of movable and immovable assets of the defendant and realization of the amount as per order of the Court and for payment of net sale proceeds to him. 3. The defendants are duly served with writ of summons as per affidavit of service (Exh.9A) through paper publication, but they failed to appear and oppose the claim of the plaintiff. Therefore, I passed the exparte order against them on 22/10/2021. 4. PW 1 Haresh Chawda, the plaintiff deposed on evidence affidavit (Exh.9) and proved documents filed with list of documents (Exh.10). Proved documents are at Exh.11 to 17. The plaintiff closed evidence vide pursis (Exh.18). Heard learned counsel Suraj Gupte for the plaintiff. I have also gone through written notes of arguments (Exh.19) filed by learned counsel Shri Suraj Gupte for the plaintiff. 5. After considering pleadings of the plaintiff and evidence on record, following points arose for my determination with my findings against them with reasons to follow : -- 3 of 6 -- Comm.Suit No. 15/19. 4 Ex-parte Judgment (Exh.20). SR.NO. POINTS FINDINGS 1. Does the plaintiff prove that he is entitled to recover amount of Rs.61,62,253.81 with interest at the rate of 18% p.a. from 01/09/2015 to 31/01/2019 with service tax / GST at 18% p.a. from the defendant ? In the Affirmative with variation in interest i.e. @ 12% p.a. 2. Does the plaintiff prove that he is entitled to interest on principal amount Rs.61,62,253.81 from the defendant ? If yes, at what rate of interest ? In the Affirmative. @ 12% p.a. 3. Does the plaintiff prove that he is entitled to sell of movable and immovable assets of the defendant as per Exh.F annexed with the plaint and to get net sale proceeds ? In the Negative. 4. What order as to costs ? As per final order. 5. What order and decree ? Suit is partly decreed. REASONS AS TO POINT NOS.1 TO 4 : 6. PW 1 Haresh has specifically stated that he carried out the work as per request of the defendant. He has given details of civil work of fixing tiles done at various sites as mentioned in para 6 of his evidence affidavit. He had raised invoices (Exh.12 colly.) from time to time, but the defendants were negligent to pay the dues. He proved letters dated 27/11/2017, 24/04/2018, 02/05/2018 and 10/07/2018 -- 4 of 6 -- Comm.Suit No. 15/19. 5 Ex-parte Judgment (Exh.20). sent to Sr.P.I., EOW (Exh.13 colly.). He also proved a demand notice dated 29/10/2019 (Exh.14). The defendants did not claim the said notice. All invoices/bills are received by the defendants, but they did not raise any dispute either by approaching the plaintiff or by appearing before this Court. Therefore, unchallenged evidence of the plaintiff coupled with documents on record is liable to be considered. The plaintiff has proved liability of the defendant to pay the outstanding amount claimed in the prayer clause of the plaint. As no rate of interest is mentioned in any of the bills, there is lack of material to demonstrate contractual rate of interest. Interest claimed by the plaintiff is exorbitant and it warrants reasonable reduction in it. Interest at the rate of 12% p.a. appears to be reasonable. Therefore, the interest is being granted from 01/09/2015 till realization of the principal amount. So far as prayer regarding sale of the defendants' property is concerned, it is the part touching to the process of execution of the decree and it is purely governed by Order 21 of the CPC. Therefore, no such relief is required to be granted while deciding the suit on merit. Costs of the suit is liable to be imposed on the defendants. Accordingly, I record my findings as to point no.1 and 2 in the affirmative with modification in rate of interest as discussed above and as to point no.3 in the negative. Hence, I pass the following order : ORDER 1. Commercial Suit No. 15/2019 is partly decreed. 2. The defendants are directed to pay amount of Rs.61,62,253.81 (Rupees Sixtyone Lakhs Sixtytwo Thousand Two Hundred Fiftythree and Paise Eightyone Only) with interest at the rate of 12% p.a. from 01/09/2015 till the date of realization within three months from the date of decree. 3. The defendants are further directed to pay amount of taxes -- 5 of 6 -- Comm.Suit No. 15/19. 6 Ex-parte Judgment (Exh.20). in respect of outstanding amount of Rs.61,62,253.81 to the plaintiff for further payment to the government as per rules. 4. The defendants shall bear the costs of the suit. 5. The defendants are jointly and severally liable to pay decretal amount to the plaintiff. 6. Court fees shall be refunded to the plaintiff as per rules. 7. Decree be drawn up accordingly. (R.R.BHAGWAT) Judge, City Civil & Sessions Court, (Court Room No.31) Date : 20/12/2021. Mumbai. 1. Dictated online on : 20/12/2021. 2. Signed on : 20/12/2021. 3. Delivered to Certified : Copy Section on “CERTIFIED TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF THE ORIGINAL SIGNED JUDGMENT/ORDER” UPLOAD DATE AND TIME NAME OF STENOGRAPHER 21/12/2021. 11.08 a.m. Miss M.A.Kulkarni. Name of the Judge (with Court Room no.) HHJ Shri R.R.Bhagwat. (Court Room No.31). Date of Pronouncement of Judgment/Order 20/12/2021. Judgment/Order signed by P.O. on 20/12/2021. Judgment/Order uploaded on 21/12/2021. -- 6 of 6 --
