Full Order Text
Order 1 · 20 Aug 2019 · CNR MHCC010024202018
Order Details: Ex-parte Judgement Pdf Text: SUMMARY SUIT NO.414/2018 1 Received on : 15022018 Registered on : 03042018 Decided on : 20082019 Duration : 01Y 06M 04D IN THE BOMBAY CITY CIVIL COURT AT MUMBAI SUMMARY SUIT NO. 414 OF 2018 (CNR NO.: MHCC010024202018) GANJAM TRADING CO.PVT.LTD. 13th floor, Times Tower, Kamalacity Senapati Bapat Marg, Lower Parel, Mumbai400013. ...Plaintiff Versus M/S. TEMPLE ROSE REAL ESTATE PVT.LTD. Having its registered office at 202, Parasmani Tower, 95 M.M.G.S.Marg, Naigaon Cross Road, Near Dadar Stn. Dadar(E), Mumbai400014. ….Defendants Appearances: Advocate Mr.Udayan S Jain for the Plaintiff. Defendants Exparte. CORAM : HIS HONOUR JUDGE SHRI.M.S.LONE (C.R.NO.28) DATE : 2OTH AUGUST 2019 J U D G M E N T This is a suit for recovery of Rs.89,44,832/(Rupees Eighty Nine Lacs Forty Four Thousand Eight Hundred and Thirty Two only). 2. Plaintiff case in nut shell is that one Mr.Devidas Gobindraj -- 1 of 5 -- SUMMARY SUIT NO.414/2018 2 Sajnani, director of defendant company approached plaintiff for financial assistance. Defendant represented that it was in the business of conversion of huge parcels of land into non agriculture and infrastructure development and for the said purpose required finances on interest. On the representation of defendant plaintiff advanced a short term loan of Rs.54,48,250/in favour of defendant. For the purpose of collateral security the defendant executed and entered into an agreement for sale with the plaintiff with respect to lands owned by defendants. It was agreed that defendant shall pay back the total amount along with interest @ 25% p.a. It was also agreed that the principal amount along with interest shall be paid on or before completion of four years from the date of the advancement of the loan. The defendant has paid interest of Rs.34,05,156/ till July 2015 but thereafter had failed to repay the loan amount. The defendant is in default of Rs.89,44,832/(Rupees Eighty Nine Lacs Forty Four Thousand Eight Hundred and Thirty Two only) hence this suit. 3. The defendants were served with summons for appearance but they remained absent therefore, suit is proceeded exparte against them. 4. From the material on record following points come for my determination and my findings with reasons are as follows: POINTS FINDINGS 1. Whether plaintiff proves that he had given loan of Rs.54,48,250/ to defendant? Yes 2. Whether plaintiff proves that amount of Rs.89,44,832/(Rupees Eighty Nine Lacs Forty Four Yes -- 2 of 5 -- SUMMARY SUIT NO.414/2018 3 Thousand Eight Hundred and Thirty Two only) is due and recoverable from defendants? 3. Whether plaintiff is entitled for recovery of Rs.89,44,832/(Rupees Eighty Nine Lacs Forty Four Thousand Eight Hundred and Thirty Two only) with interest as claimed? Yes 4. What order and decree? As per final order REASONS AS TO POINT NOS.1 TO 4. 5. Since all points are interlinked they are discussed together. To prove its case plaintiff examined Shri Ravindrasingh Shersingh Chauhan vide Exh.6 and filed extract of board resolution, original bank confirmation, original agreement for sale, advocate notice and postal receipt. 6. Heard Ldcounself for plaintiff. 7. Affidavit is supported by documentary evidence. The original bank confirmation, original agreement for sale, advocate notice and postal receipt shows that one Mr.Devidas Gobindraj Sajnani, director of defendant company approached plaintiff for financial assistance. Defendant represented that it was in the business of conversion of huge parcels of land into non agriculture and infrastructure development and for the said purpose required finances on interest. On the representation of defendant plaintiff advanced a short term loan of Rs.54,48,250/in -- 3 of 5 -- SUMMARY SUIT NO.414/2018 4 favour of defendant. For the purpose of collateral security the defendant executed and entered into an agreement for sale with the plaintiff with respect to lands owned by defendants. It was agreed that defendant shall pay back the total amount along with interest @ 25% p.a. It was also agreed that the principal amount along with interest shall be paid on or before completion of four years from the date of the advancement of the loan. The defendant has paid interest of Rs.34,05,156/ till July 2015 but thereafter had failed to repay the loan amount. The defendant is in default of Rs.89,44,832/(Rupees Eighty Nine Lacs Forty Four Thousand Eight Hundred and Thirty Two only). As far as rate of interest is concerned plaintiff has prayed interest @ 25%p.a.that rate of interest is exorbitant, however interest @ 12% p.a.will be just and proper. Therefore point No.1 to 3 are answered as 'Yes' and following order is passed. ORDER 1. Suit is exparte decreed with costs. 2. Defendant company do pay to plaintiff amount of Rs.89,44,832/ (Rupees Eighty Nine Lacs Forty Four Thousand Eight Hundred and Thirty Two only) with interest @ 12% p.a. from the date of filing of the suit till full and final realization. 3. Court fee be refunded as per rules. 4. Decree be drawn up accordingly. (M.S.LONE) Judge, Date: 20/08/2019 City Civil Court,Gr. Bombay Dictated on : 20/08/2019 Transcribed on : 22/08/2019 Signed on : 22/08/2019 -- 4 of 5 -- SUMMARY SUIT NO.414/2018 5 CERTIFIED TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF THE ORIGINAL SIGNED JUDGMENT/ORDER.” 27/08/2019 adt 10.45a.m. Mrs.J.V.Pawar UPLOAD DATE AND TIME NAME OF STENOGRAPHER Name of the Judge (With Court Room No.) HHJ Shri.M.S.Lone (C.R.NO.28) Date of pronouncement of Judgment/Order 20/08/2019 Judgment/Order signed by P.O. on 22/08/2019 Judgment/Order uploaded on 27/08/2019 -- 5 of 5 --
