Skip to main content
SUMMONS FOR JUDGT - SUMMON FOR JUDGMENT

Mr. Chetan Ramniklal ShahVsMrs. Beenaben Rajeshbhai Shah

CNR MHCC01002415201928-COURT 28 ADD SESSIONS JUDGE
City Civil Court, Mumbai
Mumbai · Maharashtra (MH)
CASE DISPOSED
Contested--OTHERWISE
Decision Date: 16th December 2019

TrustJury record updated 19 Sept 2026

Case Overview

Registration Number
100080/2019
Registration Date
04 Mar 2019

Advocates

1

For Respondent

    Not available

    Parties

    2

    Acts & Sections

    1
    Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act · Sec 9

    Case History / Proceedings

    Case History
    Date: 26-03-2019
    Business: Adv for plaintiff Ms.Kshitijas present
    Adv for deft Mr.Rajan Bhosle present
    Adv for plaintiff submitted original writ of summons (add in SR 53)
    Matter is Adjd for S/J hearing to 10/07/2019
    Next Purpose: SUMMONS FOR JUDGEMENT HEARING
    Next Hearing Date: 10-07-2019
    
    Date: 10-07-2019
    Business: Adv. Ruchita for plaintiff present.
    None present for defendant.
    KB
    LO
    Adv. Shweta Agrawal for plaintiff present.
    Adv. Rajesh Bhosale for defendant present.
    On oral request of defendant\''s adv. adjd. to 16.08.2019 for SJ hearing.
    Next Purpose: SUMMONS FOR JUDGEMENT HEARING
    Next Hearing Date: 16-08-2019
    
    Date: 16-08-2019
    Business: P.O is on training. Adjd to 5/10/19
    Next Purpose: SUMMONS FOR JUDGEMENT HEARING
    Next Hearing Date: 05-10-2019
    
    Date: 05-10-2019
    Business: None for plaintiff.
    Adv. Rajesh Bhosle for deft present.
    Registered nm 2976/19 @ affidavit filed by deft.
    KB
    LO At 12.05 p.m.
    Adv. Vaidya for plaintiff present.
    KB for order
    ORDER
    1.Notice of Motion No.2976/2019 is allowed.
    2.The delay  is condoned subject to cost of Rs. 3000/- to be given to the plaintiff.
    3.On payment of cost, the reply filed on behalf of defendant shall be taken on record.
    4.Notice of Motion No.2976/2019  stands disposed of accordingly.
    Adjd. to 18.11.2019 for compliance
    Next Purpose: COMPLIANCE
    Next Hearing Date: 18-11-2019
    
    Date: 18-11-2019
    Business: Adv. Shweta Agarwal for plff present.
    Adv. Rajesh Bhosale for deft present.
    Heard both the sides.
    Adjd. for judgment to 28.11.2019.
    Next Purpose: JUDGMENT
    Next Hearing Date: 28-11-2019
    
    Date: 28-11-2019
    Business: Adv. Ruchita Jethava for plff present.
    Adv. Rajesh Bhosale for deft present.
    Adjd. to 12.12.2019 for judgment
    LO
    Pursis for intimation that original SJ is lost filed by plff.
    O- Be kept on record.
    Next Purpose: JUDGMENT
    Next Hearing Date: 12-12-2019
    
    Date: 12-12-2019
    Business: Adv. Shitija Vaidya present for the plff.
    Adv. Rajesh Bhosale present for the Deft.
    Court is busy in dictating other order matters. Hence adj.
    Adj. For SJ order on 16/12/2019.
    Next Purpose: ORDER
    Next Hearing Date: 16-12-2019
    
    Date: 16-12-2019
    Business: SJ rejected.
    Nature Of Disposal: OTHERWISE
    Disposal Date: 16-12-2019

    Additional Case Details

    Additional Case Details
    Filing Number: 102656/2019
    Filing Date: 04-03-2019
    First Hearing Date: 26th March 2019
    Decision Date: 16th December 2019
    Court Number And Judge: 28-COURT 28 ADD SESSIONS JUDGE

    Orders

    1
    Final Order 1Full order available
    16 Dec 2019

    Order Details: Copy of Judgment Pdf Text: S.J.80/19 SUMMARY SUIT 1180/2018 1 IN THE CITY CIVIL COURT AT MUMBAI SUMMONS FOR JUDGMENT NO.80 OF 2019 IN SUMMARY SUIT NO.1180 OF 2018 (CNR.NO.MHCC010024152019) Mr. Chetan Ramniklal Shah, Adult, Age 46 years, Occ: Business. Residing at Plot No.296, Shop No.5, Jaikisan Building, R.N.Narkar Road, Pant Nagar, Ghatkopar(East), Mumbai400 075, Mobile No.09820073572 Email gautamlighting@rediffmail.com ...Plaintiff V/s. Mrs. Beenaben Rajeshbhai Shah 1401, RNA Aurovilla, 14th floor, Gujar Lane, Off.Jain Derasar Road, Landmark, Lane, Opp.Rass…

    Read Full Order

    TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.