EXECUTION APPLN
Dr. Jawaharlal Sitaram Agrwal and Ors.VsClive Chadwick CIel and Ors
CNR MHCC0100238620203-COURT 03 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE
City Civil Court, Mumbai
Mumbai · Maharashtra (MH)
CASE DISPOSED
Uncontested--OTHER
Decision Date: 06th April 2022
TrustJury record updated 28 Sept 2026
Case Overview
- Registration Number
- 100142/2020
- Registration Date
- 24 Feb 2020
Advocates
1For Petitioner
For Respondent
Not available
Parties
2Petitioner
Respondent
Acts & Sections
1Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Land (Vidarbha Region and Kutch Area) Act · Sec NOTICE
Case History / Proceedings
Case History
Date: 07-03-2020 Business: Ms. Nipa Shah Advocate for plaintiff present. On request of Ms. Shah for submitting draft deed for issue of notice u/o XXI Rule 34 of CPC, adjourned to 12/03/2020. Next Purpose: FOR___________________ Next Hearing Date: 12-03-2020 Date: 12-03-2020 Business: Ms. Nipa Shah Advocate for plaintiff present. Ms. Shah has tendered the draft of sale deed and on request of Ms. Shah for settlement of the said draft, adjd to 30/03/2020. Next Purpose: FOR___________________ Next Hearing Date: 30-03-2020 Date: 30-03-2020 Reason For Adjournment: National Lock Down Next Purpose: FOR___________________ Next Hearing Date: 15-04-2020 Date: 15-04-2020 Next Purpose: FOR___________________ Next Hearing Date: 02-06-2020 Date: 02-06-2020 Next Purpose: FOR___________________ Next Hearing Date: 19-06-2020 Date: 19-06-2020 Next Purpose: FOR___________________ Next Hearing Date: 04-08-2020 Date: 04-08-2020 Reason For Adjournment: Adjourned due to Covid-19 Next Purpose: FOR___________________ Next Hearing Date: 01-10-2020 Date: 01-10-2020 Reason For Adjournment: Adjourned due to Covid-19 Next Purpose: FOR___________________ Next Hearing Date: 07-11-2020 Date: 07-11-2020 Reason For Adjournment: Adjourned due to Covid-19 Next Purpose: FOR___________________ Next Hearing Date: 05-01-2021 Date: 05-01-2021 Business: Ms. Nipa Shah advocate for plaintiff present. On request of Ms. Shah issue notice u/o XXI Rule 34 of CPC to be served alongwith the draft deed, returnable on 04/02/2021. Next Purpose: FOR___________________ Next Hearing Date: 04-02-2021 Date: 04-02-2021 Business: Ms. Nipa Shah advocate for plaintiff present. On request of Ms Shah matter adjourned to 04/03/2021 for filing affidavit of service. Next Purpose: FOR___________________ Next Hearing Date: 04-03-2021 Date: 04-03-2021 Business: Ms. Nipa Shah advocate for plaintiff present. Execution application marked as Exh.A(Colly.). Ms. Shah tendered affidavit of service dated 04/03/2021, t.o.r. and marked as Exh.B. On request of Ms. Shah for taking further steps matter adjourned to 11/03/2021. Next Purpose: FOR___________________ Next Hearing Date: 11-03-2021 Date: 11-03-2021 Business: Ms. Nipa Shah, advocate for the Plaintiff present. Ms. Shah submits that the sale deed be sent for adjudication to the concerned Stamp Office, as the defendants though served neither appeared nor filed any objections. Ms. Shah further submits that the plaintiff is ready to bear the necessary charges in respect of adjudication and also under takes to file application stating the details of the concerned stamp office to which the sale deed is required to be sent for adjudication. Hence, the sale deed to be sent for adjudication to the concerned Stamp Office with request to return the same to this office after adjudication on or before 15/04/2021. Next Purpose: FOR___________________ Next Hearing Date: 15-04-2021 Date: 15-04-2021 Business: Today being declared holiday, adjourned to 29/06/2021. Next Purpose: FOR___________________ Next Hearing Date: 29-06-2021 Date: 29-06-2021 Business: In view of directions vide Office Order No.120 of 2021, matter adjourned to 27/07/2021. Next Purpose: FOR___________________ Next Hearing Date: 27-07-2021 Date: 27-07-2021 Business: In view of directions vide Office Order No.131 of 2021, matter adjourned to 12/08/2021. Next Purpose: FOR___________________ Next Hearing Date: 12-08-2021 Date: 12-08-2021 Business: Parties and advocate are absent adjourned to 07/10/2021. Next Purpose: FOR___________________ Next Hearing Date: 07-10-2021 Date: 07-10-2021 Business: Parties and Advocate absent matter adjourned to 25/11/2021. Next Purpose: FOR___________________ Next Hearing Date: 25-11-2021 Date: 25-11-2021 Business: Ms. Nipa Shah, advocate for plaintiff present. On request of Ms. Shah awaiting compliance, matter adjourning to 14/12/2021. Next Purpose: FOR___________________ Next Hearing Date: 14-12-2021 Date: 14-12-2021 Business: Ms.Nipa Shah, Advocate for plaintiff present. Ms.Shah states that the adjudication process has been completed and the document is likely to be received by this office within a day or two and on her request matter adjourned to 21/12/2021. Next Purpose: FOR___________________ Next Hearing Date: 21-12-2021 Date: 21-12-2021 Business: Ms.Nipa Shah, Advocate for plaintiff present. Ms.Shah for prays appointment of officer of this Court for execution/registration of Sale Deed, stating that office of Stamp Office, Kurla, has forwarded duly adjudicated Sale Deed to this office. Office record shows that the adjudicated Sale Deed has been received in this office in closed envelope vide letter dated 16/12/2021 bearing O/w.No.6030 from the office of Stamp Collector, Kurla, vide Inward No.13871 dated 17/12/2021. Said letter taken on record, marked as Exh-C. Hence, upon hearing Ms.Shah, Additional Registrar, Smt. S.D.Sawant-Luman, is hereby appointed as Court Commissioner, u/o. XXVI of CPC, for execution/registration of Sale Deed and the cost of execution of the said deed is quantified as Rs. 15,000/- to be deposited by the Plaintiff in P.L.A. Department. Court Commissioner appointed may attend the concern Registration Office, for the necessary process in respect of registration of the Sale Deed. After registration of the Sale Deed by personal attendance Court Commissioner is allowed to withdraw the Commission Cost. It is made clear that if the Commissioner seeks exemption under the provisions of Registration Act from personal attendance during the process of registration, the cost quantified hereinabove will be credited to the Govt. For compliance, adjd to 21/01/2022. Next Purpose: FOR___________________ Next Hearing Date: 21-01-2022 Date: 21-01-2022 Business: Ms.Nipa Shah, Advocate for Plaintiff present. Office of Sub-Registrar, Kurla No.1, has returned the original Sale Deed without its registration, for the reasons mentioned in the letter O.W.No./Kurla 1/84/2022 dated 20/01/2022, received in this office vide Marathi Inward No.226 dated 21/01/2022, t.o.r., said letter marked as Exh-D. Smt.S.D.Sawant-Luman, Addl.Registrar, who was appointed as Court Commissioner for registration of the Sale Deed has also filed her report regarding no registration of the said Sale Deed, t.o.r., marked as Exh.-E. Contents of the letter received from Sub-Registrar, Kurla 1, have pointed out to Ms.Shah, Advocate for plaintiff and she seeks time to file her say to the queries raised by the said office and on her request matter adjourned to 01/02/2022. Next Purpose: FOR___________________ Next Hearing Date: 01-02-2022 Date: 01-02-2022 Business: Ms.Nipa Shah, Advocate for Plaintiff present. Ms.Shah tendered say dated 01/02/2022 in regard to the queries raised by the office of Sub-Registrar, Kurla-1, at the time of registration of Sale Deed, t.o.r. marked as Exh-F. Perused the say and heard Ms.Shah. It is seen that that the office of Sub-Registrar has raised query on the point of difference in area mentioned in Sale Deed and in property card in respect of CTS No.1285/1. Ms.Shah fairly submits that to decide the issue, matter be referred to Honourable Court No.3. Hence, considering the issue in question, on request of Ms.Shah, matter is hereby submitted to Honourable Court No.3 on 09/02/2022. Office to take steps to assign the matter to Court No.3. Parties and Advocates to appear before Court No.3 on 09/02/2022. Next Purpose: FOR___________________ Next Hearing Date: 09-02-2022 Date: 09-02-2022 Business: Matter mentioned at 12.12 p.m. Adv. Mili Thakker a/w Adv. Nipa Shah for DH present. Heard Ld. Advocate for DH. It is argued on behalf of plaintiff that there is correction in the area of CTS No.1285/1. As per CT survey record, the area is 17.8 sq. mt. But the actual area is 324.46 sq. mt. And therefore, registrar refused to register the document. This court passed decree as per the schedule of property annexed by the plaintiff. This court in execution cannot go into the correction of area. The registrar to execute the decree as it is. Matter stands adjourned to 06.04.2022 for compliance. Next Purpose: COMPLIANCE Next Hearing Date: 06-04-2022 Date: 06-04-2022 Business: Matter called out at 12.05 p.m. Adv. Nipa Shah for DH present. Report received from registrar. TOR. Exh.2. Compliance of the execution is done. In view of that execution application disposed of. The original agreement be returned to the DH as per rule. Execution Application no.142/20 is disposed of accordingly. Nature Of Disposal: OTHER Disposal Date: 06-04-2022
Additional Case Details
Additional Case Details
Filing Number: 101940/2020 Filing Date: 24-02-2020 First Hearing Date: 07th March 2020 Decision Date: 06th April 2022 Court Number And Judge: 3-COURT 03 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE
Orders
1Final Order 106 Apr 2022
06 Apr 2022
Order Details: Other Pdf Text: 06.04.2022 Sr. No.90 EA 142/20 Exh.2 CORAM : H.H.J. SHRI.A.H.LADDHAD (C.R. 03) Matter called out at 12.05 p.m. Adv. Nipa Shah for DH present. Report received from registrar. TOR. Exh.2. Compliance of the execution is done. In view of that execution application disposed of. The original agreement be returned to the DH as per rule. Execution Application no.142/20 is disposed of accordingly. Judge -- 1 of 1 --
TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.
