Skip to main content
EXECUTION APPLN

Sunita A.ShindeVsVanita Sajan Pawar

CNR MHCC010023852020966-IC REGISTRAR CITY CIVIL COURT MUMBAI
City Civil Court, Mumbai
Mumbai · Maharashtra (MH)
CASE DISPOSED
Uncontested--ALLOWED
Decision Date: 30th January 2021

TrustJury record updated 28 Sept 2026

Case Overview

Registration Number
100141/2020
Registration Date
24 Feb 2020

Advocates

1

For Petitioner

For Respondent

    Not available

    Parties

    2

    Petitioner

    1. 1Sunita A.Shinde

    Respondent

    1. 1Vanita Sajan Pawar

    Acts & Sections

    1
    Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Land (Vidarbha Region and Kutch Area) Act · Sec warrant

    Case History / Proceedings

    Case History
    Date: 06-03-2020
Business: Parties and advocates are absent. Matter adjourned to 12/03/2020.
Next Purpose: FOR___________________
Next Hearing Date: 12-03-2020

Date: 12-03-2020
Business: Shri. Rajesh Patil  Advocate for Plaintiff present.
Shri. Patil prays for issue of warrant u/o.XXI rule 46 of CPC, stating that the present exe.application is in continuation of earlier execution application no.538/2015, wherein warrant u/o.XXI Rule 48 was issued and the defendant has now retired from the service.
Hence, issue warrant as prayed for, returnable on 12/06/2020.
Next Purpose: FOR___________________
Next Hearing Date: 12-06-2020

Date: 12-06-2020
Next Purpose: FOR___________________
Next Hearing Date: 10-08-2020

Date: 10-08-2020
Reason For Adjournment: Adjourned due to Covid-19
Next Purpose: FOR___________________
Next Hearing Date: 28-09-2020

Date: 28-09-2020
Reason For Adjournment: Adjourned due to Covid-19
Next Purpose: FOR___________________
Next Hearing Date: 23-11-2020

Date: 23-11-2020
Reason For Adjournment: Adjourned due to Covid-19
Next Purpose: FOR___________________
Next Hearing Date: 30-01-2021

Date: 30-01-2021
Business: Shri Rajesh Patil, advocate for plaintiff present. Shri Patil states that as the warrant u/o.XXI Rule 48 in the matter has already been issued, present Execution Application may be disposed off by keeping alive the said warrant till full satisfaction of Decree subject to provisions of Section 60 of CPC and by granting liberty to plaintiff to apply for Registrars Certificate and Payment Order from time to time till full satisfaction of Decree, with further liberty to plaintiff to take out Garnishee Proceedings, if necessary.
In view of this, present Execution Application stands disposed off by keeping alive the warrant U/o.XXI, Rule 48 issued in the matter, till full satisfaction of the decree subject to provisions of Section 60 of CPC, with liberty as prayed for.
Nature Of Disposal: ALLOWED
Disposal Date: 30-01-2021

    Additional Case Details

    Additional Case Details
    Filing Number: 102083/2020
Filing Date: 24-02-2020
First Hearing Date: 06th March 2020
Decision Date: 30th January 2021
Court Number And Judge: 966-IC REGISTRAR CITY CIVIL COURT MUMBAI

    Orders

    0

    No order text is available in this record.

    TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.