EXECUTION APPLN
SHIVAJI GANGARAM AROTEVsSANJAY KANTILAL SOLANKI
CNR MHCC010023372018966-IC REGISTRAR CITY CIVIL COURT MUMBAI
City Civil Court, Mumbai
Mumbai · Maharashtra (MH)
CASE DISPOSED
Contested--ALLOWED
Decision Date: 24th June 2019
TrustJury record updated 09 Sept 2026
Case Overview
- Registration Number
- 100051/2018
- Registration Date
- 12 Feb 2018
Advocates
1For Petitioner
For Respondent
Not available
Parties
2Petitioner
Respondent
Acts & Sections
1Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Land (Vidarbha Region and Kutch Area) Act · Sec warrant
Case History / Proceedings
Case History
Date: 08-03-2018 Business: Parties and Advocate absent. Adjourned to 18/04/2018. Next Purpose: FOR___________________ Next Hearing Date: 18-04-2018 Date: 18-04-2018 Business: Parties and Advocate absent. Adjd to 05/05/2018. Next Purpose: FOR___________________ Next Hearing Date: 05-05-2018 Date: 05-05-2018 Business: Mr. Balbheem Patil, Advocate of Plaintiff Present. Shri Patil prays for issue of notice under order XXI, Rule 22 of CPC. Hence, issue notice as prayed for returnable on 22/06/2018. Next Purpose: FOR___________________ Next Hearing Date: 22-06-2018 Date: 22-06-2018 Business: Mr. Balbheem Patil, Advocate for Plaintiff, present. On request of Shri Patil for completing service adjd to 27/07/2018. Next Purpose: FOR___________________ Next Hearing Date: 27-07-2018 Date: 27-07-2018 Business: Parties and Advocate absent, adjd to 01/09/2018. Next Purpose: FOR___________________ Next Hearing Date: 01-09-2018 Date: 01-09-2018 Business: Mr. Balbheem Patil, Advocate for Plaintiff, present. On request of Mr. Patil for completing service, adjd to 01/10/2018. Next Purpose: FOR___________________ Next Hearing Date: 01-10-2018 Date: 01-10-2018 Business: Mr. Balbheem Patil, Advocate for Plaintiff, present. Since, Court is on leave, board discharged and on request of Mr. Patil adjd to 08/10/2018. Next Purpose: FOR___________________ Next Hearing Date: 08-10-2018 Date: 08-10-2018 Business: Mr. Balbheem Patil, Advocate for Plaintiff, present. On request of Mr. Patil for completing service, adjd to 15/10/2018. Next Purpose: FOR___________________ Next Hearing Date: 15-10-2018 Date: 15-10-2018 Business: Mr. Balbheem Patil, Advocate for Plaintiff, present. On request of Mr. Patil, for completing service, adjd to 26/10/2018. Next Purpose: FOR___________________ Next Hearing Date: 26-10-2018 Date: 26-10-2018 Business: Mr. Balbheem Patil, Advocate for Plaintiff, present. Mr. Patil has tendered Affidavit of service dated 26/10/2018, t.o.r. and marked as Exh.4. Mr. Patil states that packet containing notice has been returned by the Postal Department with the remark \''unclaimed\'', which amounts to good service. In view of this, adjd to 01/11/2018 for orders. Next Purpose: FOR___________________ Next Hearing Date: 01-11-2018 Date: 01-11-2018 Business: Mr. Balbheem Patil, Advocate for Plaintiff, present. Mr. Patil prays for issue of warrant u/o.XXI Rule 48 of CPC by making notice absolute, as the Defendant though served neither appeared nor filed his reply. In view of this upon perusing the affidavit service and upon hearing Mr. Patil, issue warrant as prayed for returnable on 29/01/2019. Next Purpose: FOR___________________ Next Hearing Date: 29-01-2019 Date: 29-01-2019 Business: Shri. Balbheem Patil, Advocate for plaintiff present. Letter bearing no. TMH/PER/COURT_RECOVERY/950158/2018, Dt. 17/12/2018, under this office inward no. 13963, Dt. 21/12/2018, stating therein that salary will be remitted as and when the employee (defedant) will draw the enough salary, taken on record and marked as Exh. 05. On request of Shri. Patil, adjourned to 24/06/2019. Next Purpose: FOR___________________ Next Hearing Date: 24-06-2019 Date: 24-06-2019 Business: Shri. B.S. Patil, advocate for plaintiff present. Shri. Patil states that the warrant u/o.XXI Rule 48 in the matter has been issued on 19/11/2018 and deduction from salary of defendant has already commenced, therefore, appropriate orders may be passed. In view of this present Execution Application stands disposed off. It is made clear that though the Exe.Application is marked as disposed off, warrant issued in the matter will remain alive and the employer of the defendant to comply with the warrant till full satisfaction of Decree subject to provisions of Section 60 of CPC. Plaintiff will be at liberty to apply for Registrars Certificate and Payment Order from time to time till full satisfaction of Decree. Office of Sheriff of Mumbai to furnish certificate/report in respect of warrant of attachment every six months. Plaintiff is at liberty to take out Garnishee Proceedings, if necessary. Plaintiff is also at liberty to file fresh Exe.Application for the residual amount, if Decree is not satisfied within 12 years. Plaintiff shall apply for marking the Decree as fully satisfied upon receipt of entire decretal amount. Office of the Sheriff of Mumbai to act on the certified copy of this Order. Nature Of Disposal: ALLOWED Disposal Date: 24-06-2019
Additional Case Details
Additional Case Details
Filing Number: 101765/2018 Filing Date: 12-02-2018 First Hearing Date: 08th March 2018 Decision Date: 24th June 2019 Court Number And Judge: 966-IC REGISTRAR CITY CIVIL COURT MUMBAI
Orders
0No order text is available in this record.
TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.
