Skip to main content
NOTICE OF MOTION

Mohammad Hussain ChoudharyVsMCGM

CNR MHCC01002335201811-COURT 11 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE
City Civil Court, Mumbai
Mumbai · Maharashtra (MH)
CASE DISPOSED
Uncontested--DISMISSED
Decision Date: 08th February 2018

TrustJury record updated 09 Sept 2026

Case Overview

Registration Number
100608/2018
Registration Date
14 Feb 2018

Advocates

1

For Petitioner

For Respondent

    Not available

    Parties

    2

    Petitioner

    1. 1Mohammad Hussain Choudhary

    Respondent

    1. 1MCGM

    Acts & Sections

    1
    Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Land (Vidarbha Region and Kutch Area) Act · Sec 9

    Case History / Proceedings

    Case History
    Date: 08-02-2018
Business: Adv. Mr. V. T. Dubey for Plaintiff present.
Adv. Ms. Hajare for BMC/Deft present.
Advocate for defendant seeks adjournment for filing reply to notice of motion. It appears that ad-interim order has been passed on 06/03/2014 and thus, since the date till today defendant has failed to file reply to notice of motion. Therefore, in the above facts and circumstances request of advocate for defendant is rejected and no reply order is hereby passed against the defendant.
          In view of order passed on 06/03/2014, it be continued till final decision of the suit and draft Notice of motion stands disposed of and  it be registered for statistical purpose.
Nature Of Disposal: DISMISSED
Disposal Date: 08-02-2018

    Additional Case Details

    Additional Case Details
    Filing Number: 102303/2018
Filing Date: 14-02-2018
First Hearing Date: 08th February 2018
Decision Date: 08th February 2018
Court Number And Judge: 11-COURT 11  ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE

    Orders

    2
    Final Order 1
    08 Feb 2018
    Order Details: Other
Pdf Text: Back
Daily Status
IN THE COURT OF :COURT 11 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE
Case No. :NOTICE OF MOTION/0100608/2018
Mohammad Hussain Choudhary Vs MCGM
Date : 08-02-2018
Business : Adv. Mr. V. T. Dubey for Plaintiff present. Adv. Ms. Hajare
for BMC/Deft present. Advocate for defendant seeks
adjournment for filing reply to notice of motion. It appears
that ad-interim order has been passed on 06/03/2014 and
thus, since the date till today defendant has failed to file
reply to notice of motion. Therefore, in the above facts and
circumstances request of advocate for defendant is rejected
and no reply order is hereby passed against the defendant.
In view of order passed on 06/03/2014, it be continued till
final decision of the suit and draft Notice of motion stands
disposed of and it be registered for statistical purpose.
Nature of Disposal : DISMISSED
Disposal Date : 08-02-2018
COURT 11 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE
-- 1 of 1 --
    Order 1
    08 Feb 2018
    Order Details: Other
Pdf Text: Back
Daily Status
IN THE COURT OF :COURT 11 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE
Case No. :NOTICE OF MOTION/0100608/2018
Mohammad Hussain Choudhary Vs MCGM
Date : 08-02-2018
Business : Adv. Mr. V. T. Dubey for Plaintiff present. Adv. Ms. Hajare
for BMC/Deft present. Advocate for defendant seeks
adjournment for filing reply to notice of motion. It appears
that ad-interim order has been passed on 06/03/2014 and
thus, since the date till today defendant has failed to file
reply to notice of motion. Therefore, in the above facts and
circumstances request of advocate for defendant is rejected
and no reply order is hereby passed against the defendant.
In view of order passed on 06/03/2014, it be continued till
final decision of the suit and draft Notice of motion stands
disposed of and it be registered for statistical purpose.
Nature of Disposal : DISMISSED
Disposal Date : 08-02-2018
COURT 11 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE
-- 1 of 1 --

    TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.