Skip to main content
SUIT - SHORT CAUSE CIVIL SUIT

Prakash Pandurang Alim +4 moreVsMunicipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai through its Municipal Commissioner +2 more

CNR MHCC0100232820206-COURT 06 ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE
City Civil Court, Mumbai
Mumbai · Maharashtra (MH)
CASE DISPOSED
Uncontested--OTHERWISE
Decision Date: 28th August 2025

TrustJury record updated 27 Sept 2026

Case Overview

Registration Number
102030/2025
Registration Date
29 Aug 2025

Advocates

1

For Petitioner

For Respondent

    Not available

    Parties

    8

    Petitioner

    1. 1Prakash Pandurang Alim
    2. 2Subashchandra Shriwastav
    3. 3Ramesh Sakharam Chavan
    4. 4Gangadhar Shankar Nyamtabad
    5. 5Vivek Hariprasad Singh

    Respondent

    1. 1Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai through its Municipal Commissioner
    2. 2Assistant Engineer Building and Factory III G North Ward
    3. 3Omkar Realtors and developers pvt ltd

    Acts & Sections

    1
    Specific Relief Act · Sec 39

    Case History / Proceedings

    Case History
    Date: 28-08-2025
Business: Plaintiff and his advocate both are absent since long. The plaintiff has not taken any effective steps for the removal of office objection. Hence, suit is dismissed for want of compliance of office objection. Pending applications if any, be disposed as became infractuos. The suit be registered and disposed of for statistical purpose.
Nature Of Disposal: OTHERWISE
Disposal Date: 28-08-2025

    Additional Case Details

    Additional Case Details
    Filing Number: 102484/2020
Filing Date: 24-02-2020
First Hearing Date: 28th August 2025
Decision Date: 28th August 2025
Court Number And Judge: 6-COURT 06  ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE

    Orders

    1
    Final Order 1
    28 Aug 2025
    Order Details: Other
Pdf Text: Daily Status
IN THE COURT OF :COURT 06 ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE
Case No. :SUIT/0102030/2025
Prakash Pandurang Alim Vs Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai Through its Municipal Commissioner
Date : 28-08-2025
Business : Plaintiff and his advocate both are absent since long. The
plaintiff has not taken any effective steps for the removal of
office objection. Hence, suit is dismissed for want of
compliance of office objection. Pending applications if any, be
disposed as became infractuos. The suit be registered and
disposed of for statistical purpose.
Nature of Disposal : OTHERWISE
Disposal Date : 28-08-2025
COURT 06 ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE
-- 1 of 1 --

    TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.