Skip to main content
EXECUTION APPLN

SUNKAPPA G. JADHAVVsVINOD ANANT KONDKAR

CNR MHCC010023242018966-IC REGISTRAR CITY CIVIL COURT MUMBAI
City Civil Court, Mumbai
Mumbai · Maharashtra (MH)
CASE DISPOSED
Uncontested--ALLOWED
Decision Date: 13th December 2018

TrustJury record updated 09 Sept 2026

Case Overview

Registration Number
100050/2018
Registration Date
13 Feb 2018

Advocates

1

For Petitioner

For Respondent

    Not available

    Parties

    2

    Petitioner

    1. 1SUNKAPPA G. JADHAV

    Respondent

    1. 1VINOD ANANT KONDKAR

    Acts & Sections

    1
    Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Land (Vidarbha Region and Kutch Area) Act · Sec warrant

    Case History / Proceedings

    Case History
    Date: 08-03-2018
Business: Mr. Ramesh Jain, Advocate for Plaintiff, present. Shri Sunkappa G. Jadhav, Plaintiff, present.  Shri Jain prays for issue of warrant u/o. XXI R 48 of CPC without notice as the Decree is within two years.  Issue warrant u/o XXI R 48 returnable on 11/06/2018.
Next Purpose: FOR___________________
Next Hearing Date: 11-06-2018

Date: 11-06-2018
Business: Mr. Ramesh Jain, Advocate for Plaintiff, present. On request of Mr. Jain adjd to 17/07/2018.
Next Purpose: FOR___________________
Next Hearing Date: 17-07-2018

Date: 17-07-2018
Business: Parties and Advocate absent, adjd to 11/09/2018.
Next Purpose: FOR___________________
Next Hearing Date: 11-09-2018

Date: 11-09-2018
Business: Parties and Advocate absent, adjd to 01/12/2018.
Next Purpose: FOR___________________
Next Hearing Date: 01-12-2018

Date: 01-12-2018
Business: Parties and Advocate absent. Since, Court is on leave, board discharged and adjd to 03/12/2018.
Next Purpose: FOR___________________
Next Hearing Date: 03-12-2018

Date: 03-12-2018
Business: Shri Ramesh Jain, Advocate for Plaintiff present. On request of Shri Jain, adjourned to 13/12/2018.
Next Purpose: FOR___________________
Next Hearing Date: 13-12-2018

Date: 13-12-2018
Business: Shri Ramesh Jain, Advocate for plaintiff present.  Shri Jain states that as the warrant u/o.XXI Rule 48 in the matter has been issued on 28/03/2018, appropriate orders may be passed. In view of this present Execution Application stands disposed off. It is made clear that though the Exe.Application is marked as disposed off, warrant issued in the matter will remain alive and the employer of the defendant to comply with the warrant till full satisfaction of Decree subject to provisions of Section 60 of CPC. Plaintiff will be at liberty to apply for Registrars Certificate and Payment Order from time to time till full satisfaction of Decree. Office of Sheriff of Mumbai to furnish certificate/report in respect of warrant of attachment every six months. Plaintiff is at liberty to take out Garnishee Proceedings, if necessary. Plaintiff is also at liberty to file fresh Exe.Application for the residual amount, if Decree is not satisfied within 12 years. Plaintiff shall apply for marking the Decree as fully satisfied upon receipt of entire decretal amount. Office of the Sheriff of Mumbai to act on the certified copy of this Order.
Nature Of Disposal: ALLOWED
Disposal Date: 13-12-2018

    Additional Case Details

    Additional Case Details
    Filing Number: 102280/2018
Filing Date: 13-02-2018
First Hearing Date: 08th March 2018
Decision Date: 13th December 2018
Court Number And Judge: 966-IC REGISTRAR CITY CIVIL COURT MUMBAI

    Orders

    0

    No order text is available in this record.

    TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.