Skip to main content
SUIT - SHORT CAUSE CIVIL SUIT

Ronak Domnic WorlikarVsMCGM

CNR MHCC0100228620196-COURT 06 ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE
City Civil Court, Mumbai
Mumbai · Maharashtra (MH)
CASE DISPOSED
Uncontested--OTHER
Decision Date: 15th March 2019

TrustJury record updated 19 Sept 2026

Case Overview

Registration Number
100644/2019
Registration Date
11 Mar 2019

Advocates

1

For Petitioner

For Respondent

    Not available

    Parties

    2

    Petitioner

    1. 1Ronak Domnic Worlikar

    Respondent

    1. 1MCGM

    Acts & Sections

    2
    Hindu Marriage Act · Sec 34and38
    Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act · Sec orderXXXIX

    Case History / Proceedings

    Case History
    Date: 15-03-2019
Business: By precipe.
Advocate Mr. Sarogi for plaintiff present and filed draft NM.
Advocate Mr. Kumawat for deft./MMC present with officer Shri Prakash Sonawane (JE, G/south).
Heard both the sides on draft NM.
Perused the plaint and draft NM. Plaintiff sought permission from the court to carry tenantable repairs. However, as per section 342 no such permission is necessary to carry the tenantable repairs. The defendant corporation is at liberty to take action against the suit premises in case of violation of any provision of MMC Act. In view of this suit and draft NM are disposed of. Draft NM be registered for statistic purpose. Proceeding is closed.
Nature Of Disposal: OTHER
Disposal Date: 15-03-2019

    Additional Case Details

    Additional Case Details
    Filing Number: 102465/2019
Filing Date: 27-02-2019
First Hearing Date: 15th March 2019
Decision Date: 15th March 2019
Court Number And Judge: 6-COURT 06  ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE

    Orders

    1
    Final Order 1
    15 Mar 2019
    Order Details: Other
Pdf Text: IN THE COURT OF :COURT 6 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE
Case No. :SUIT/0100644/2019
Ronak Domnic Worlikar Vs MCGM
Date : 15-03-2019
Business : By precipe. Advocate Mr. Sarogi for plaintiff present and
filed draft NM. Advocate Mr. Kumawat for deft./MMC
present with officer Shri Prakash Sonawane (JE, G/south).
Heard both the sides on draft NM. Perused the plaint and
draft NM. Plaintiff sought permission from the court to
carry tenantable repairs. However, as per section 342 no
such permission is necessary to carry the tenantable repairs.
The defendant corporation is at liberty to take action
against the suit premises in case of violation of any
provision of MMC Act. In view of this suit and draft NM
are disposed of. Draft NM be registered for statistic
purpose. Proceeding is closed.
Nature of Disposal : OTHER
Disposal Date : 15-03-2019
COURT 6 ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE
-- 1 of 1 --

    TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.