SUIT - SHORT CAUSE CIVIL SUIT
Tejaswini@tejashree Anil ShirkeVsPratiksha Narayan Rawle +4 more
CNR MHCC01002268202064-COURT 64 AD-HOC ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE
City Civil Court, Mumbai
Mumbai · Maharashtra (MH)
PENDING
TrustJury record updated 27 Sept 2026
Case Overview
- Registration Number
- 101184/2020
- Registration Date
- 23 Oct 2020
- Next Hearing Date
- 09 Oct 2026
- Case Stage
- RECORDING EVIDENCE P.H.
Advocates
1For Petitioner
For Respondent
Not available
Parties
6Acts & Sections
1CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE · Sec 9
Case History / Proceedings
Case History
Date: 23-11-2020
Business: Plaintiff not present.
Adv. Prakash Sutar for plaintiff present and submitted affidavit of service.
Defendant no. 1, 2 and 4 present.
Defendant no. 3 and 5 absent though served.
Heard both sides. The defendants no. 1, 2 and 4 submitted that they want time to engage an advocate. Time granted.
On oral request of the defendants, Matter stands Adj for filing WS by defendant no. 1, 2 and 4 orders against defendant no. 3 and 5 to 04.12.2020.
Next Purpose: WRITTEN STATEMENT
Next Hearing Date: 04-12-2020
Date: 04-12-2020
Business: Adv. Pratap Sutar for plaintiff present and submitted that as per the bailiff report and affidavit of service filed on record the deft. No. 1 to 4 have been served through deft. No. 2 and deft. No. 5 has been separately served but the deft. No. 3 and 5 are absent hence, Exparte order may be passed against them.
Adv. Vaibhav Kamble on behalf of Adv. Mahadik for Deft No. 1, 2 and 4 present and filed VP. He also submitted an application for seeking time to file written statement pointing out that the name of deft.No. 2 has been wrongly mentioned as Deepak Narayan Rawle. It is Babaji Narayan Rawle. Therefore, he submitted that plaintiff may be directed to carry out necessary amendments in the plaint in this regard. Ld. counsel for the plaintiff has no objection to make the necessary correction by amending the plaint. He seeks time for taking out necessary CHS in that regard. Time granted.
Ld. counsel for the Defts. No. 1,2 and 4 submitted that he is likely to get instructions for appearing also on behalf of Deft No. 3 and 5, therefore, Exparte order may not be passed against them today.
In view of the above submissions, 4 weeks time granted for filing WS on behalf of Deft. No. 1, 2 and 4. He is also granted time for appearance of Deft No. 3 and 5 by next date.
Matter stands Adj for Written Statement of Deft No. 1, 2 and 4 and appearance of Deft. No. 3 and 5 to 21.01.2021
Next Purpose: WRITTEN STATEMENT
Next Hearing Date: 21-01-2021
Date: 21-01-2021
Business: Advocate Prakash Sutar for plaintiff present and tendered draft chamber summons along with affidavit in support. T.O.R. Leave is granted to register Chamber Summons.
None for defendant.
The case is adjourned to 25.02.2021 for Ch/s reply.
Next Purpose: C/S REPLY
Next Hearing Date: 25-02-2021
Date: 25-02-2021
Business: Advocate Prakash Sutar for plaintiff present and tendered registered Chamber Summons No.314/21 along with affidavit in support of Chamber Summons. T.O.R.
Copy served on advocate for defendants 1 and 2.
Advocate Rahul Mahadik for defendants no. 1 and 2 present.
The case is adjourned to 09.04.2021 for Ch/s reply.
Next Purpose: C/S REPLY
Next Hearing Date: 09-04-2021
Date: 09-04-2021
Reason For Adjournment: Adjourned due to Covid-19
Next Purpose: C/S REPLY
Next Hearing Date: 29-06-2021
Date: 29-06-2021
Business: In view of office order No. 100/2021 dtd. 04.06.2021 of Hon''ble Principal Judge, City Civil and Sessions Court, Mumbai, pursuant to circular dtd. 16.04.2021 issued by Hon''ble Bombay High Court prescribing Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) in the wake of sharp surge in COVID-19 cases and the views of stakeholders, the matter is adjourned.
Next Purpose: C/S REPLY
Next Hearing Date: 03-09-2021
Date: 03-09-2021
Business: Matter called out at 4.00 p.m.
Adv. Prakash V. Sutar for plaintiff present.
None for defendant.
Plaintiff filed CS 314/21 for correction in the name of defendant no. 2. I have perused CS as well as application dated 04.12.2020 filed by defendant no. 1,2 and 4 wherein they have informed that correct name of defendant no. 2 is Babaji Narayan Rawale and not Deepak Narayan Rawale. In my view, the amendment is of formal in nature. Same needs to be allowed. Hence, CS is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a). Pliantiff is allowed to carry out necessary amendment in the title clause of plaint as well as body of suit wherever it is required. In terms of the above, CS disposed of.
Matter stands adjourned to 28.10.2021 for WS.
Next Purpose: WRITTEN STATEMENT
Next Hearing Date: 11-10-2021
Date: 11-10-2021
Business: Matter mentioned at 2.57 p.m.
NOBTOB
Moved by praecipe.
O-Allowed
Adv. Prakash Sutar for plaintiff present.
He tendered application for granting permission to carry out amendment. Exh.5
O-Allowed.
Matter already stands adjourned to 28.10.2021
Next Purpose: COMPLIANCE
Next Hearing Date: 28-10-2021
Date: 28-10-2021
Business: Matter mentioned at 1.36 p.m.
Adv. Prakash U. Sutar for plaintiff present.
Adv. Vaibhav Kamble I/b Rahul Mahadik for Deft. No.1 to 4 present.
He tendered VP. TOR. Exh.6.
He also filed WS. TOR. Exh.7.
Copy supplied to the other sides.
Matter stands adjourned to 20.01.2022 for Issues.
Next Purpose: FRAMING ISSUES
Next Hearing Date: 20-01-2022
Date: 20-01-2022
Reason For Adjournment: Adjourned due to Covid-19
Next Purpose: FRAMING ISSUES
Next Hearing Date: 21-03-2022
Date: 21-03-2022
Business: Adv. P. V. Sutar for plaintiff present.
Issue not framed.
Matter stands adjourned to 09.06.2022 for Issues.
Next Purpose: FRAMING ISSUES
Next Hearing Date: 09-06-2022
Date: 09-06-2022
Business: Adv. Prakash Sutar for plaintiff present.
None present for defendant.
Issues framed below Exh.8.
ISSUES
1. Whether the plaintiff is entitled for 1/3rd share in the suit premises ?
2. Whether the plaintiff is entitled to receive an amount of Rs.40,00,000/- in alternatively ?
3. Is the plaintiff entitled for reliefs sought ?
4. What order and decree ?
Plaintiff to file list of witness, evidence on affidavit alongwith documents as per list with advance copy to the other side on or before next date.
Matter stands adjourned to 08.08.2022 for Evidence.
Next Purpose: RECORDING EVIDENCE
Next Hearing Date: 08-08-2022
Date: 08-08-2022
Business: Adv. Prakash Sutar for plaintiff present. He is seeking time to file evidence. Time granted.
Adv. Rahul Mahadik for defendant present.
Matter stands adjourned to 12.10.2022 for evidence.
Next Purpose: RECORDING EVIDENCE
Next Hearing Date: 12-10-2022
Date: 12-10-2022
Business: Adv. Prashant Sutar for plaintiff present. He is seeking time. Time granted.
None present for defendant.
Matter stands adjourned to 22.12.2022 for evidence.
Next Purpose: RECORDING EVIDENCE
Next Hearing Date: 22-12-2022
Date: 22-12-2022
Business: None present.
Matter stands adjourned to 13.03.2023 for evidence.
Later on at 11.26 p.m.
Adv. Prakash Sutar for plaitnff present.
Already adjourned to 13.03.2023.
Later on at 12.49 p.m.
Adv. Rahul Mahadik for defendants present.
Already adjourned to 13.03.2023.
Next Purpose: RECORDING EVIDENCE
Next Hearing Date: 13-03-2023
Date: 13-03-2023
Business: Plaintiff a/w Adv. Sutar present. He is seeking time. Time granted.
None present for defendant.
Matter stands adjourned on 21.06.2023 for recording evidence.
Next Purpose: RECORDING EVIDENCE
Next Hearing Date: 21-06-2023
Date: 21-06-2023
Business: Adv Prakash Sutar for Plaintiff present.
Adv Kamble for defendant present.
Suit is pending for evidence since 08.08.20022. Plaintiff failed to adduce evidence hence, put for dismissal order.
Matter stands adjourned on 04-09-2023 for dismissal order.
Next Purpose: DISMISSAL
Next Hearing Date: 04-09-2023
Date: 04-09-2023
Business: Plaintiff a/w Adv P.U. Sutar present and filed affidavit of evidence of PW.1 TOR.Exh.9 and List of document. TOR. Exh.10.
Examination in chief of PW.1 is commenced and completed.
Matter stands adjourned on 22-11-2023 for cross-examination.
Next Purpose: RECORDING EVIDENCE P.H.
Next Hearing Date: 22-11-2023
Date: 22-11-2023
Business: None present for Plaintiff.
Advocate Vaibhav Kamble present for Defendants and filed reply on document Exhibit 10.
Defendant nos. 2 and 3 in person present.
Later on at 11.51 am.
Advocate Sutar a/w Plaintiff present.
Matter stands adjourned on 09-02-2024 for admission and denial.
Next Purpose: ADMISSION DENIAL
Next Hearing Date: 09-02-2024
Date: 09-02-2024
Business: IN THE COURT OF H.H.J. S. B. JOSHI JUDGE CITY CIVIL COURT C.R. NO. 61
This court newly formed on 02.01.2024.
Matter transferred from CRNo.
Adv.Prakash Sutar for plaintiff.
Adv. Vaibhav Kamble for defendant present and submitted that consdering the objection taken to the documents filed by the plaintiff.
Heard advocate for the plaintiff on Exh.10.
Matter adjourned for order on documents (Exh.10) to 30-03-2024.
Next Purpose: ORDER
Next Hearing Date: 30-03-2024
Date: 30-03-2024
Business: Court is on leave
Next Purpose: ORDER
Next Hearing Date: 10-04-2024
Date: 10-04-2024
Business: The P.O. is on Leave
Next Purpose: ORDER
Next Hearing Date: 21-06-2024
Date: 21-06-2024
Business: The Court is on Leave.
Next Purpose: ORDER
Next Hearing Date: 26-07-2024
Date: 26-07-2024
Business: IN THE COURT OF H.H.J. R. D. DESHPANDE JUDGE CITY CIVIL COURT C.R. NO. 61
None for plaintiff.
Adv. Vaibhav Kambale for all the defendants is present.
Matter adjourned for hearing on Exh.10 to 01.10.2024
Next Purpose: HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 01-10-2024
Date: 01-10-2024
Business: IN THE COURT OF H.H.J. R. D. DESHPANDE JUDGE CITY CIVIL COURT C.R. NO. 61
Adv. Prakash Sutar for plaintiff is present.
Adv. Vaibhav Kamble for defendants No. 1 to 3 is present.
None for other defendants.
KB for hearing on documents.
LO at 2.00 pm.
Court time is over in recording evidence in 2 matters ie. Suits No.2167/13 and 1662/15.
Matter adjourned for hearing on documents to 24-10-2024.
Next Purpose: ADMISSION DENIAL
Next Hearing Date: 24-10-2024
Date: 24-10-2024
Business: IN THE COURT OF H.H.J. R. D. DESHPANDE JUDGE CITY CIVIL COURT C.R. NO. 61
Plaintiff alongwith her Adv. Prakash Sutar is present.
Adv. Vaibhav Kamble for defendant is present.
KB for hearing on documents at Exh.10.
LO at 1.22 pm.
Plaintiff alongwith her Adv. Prakash Sutar is present.
None for defendant.
Heard arguments of advocate Prakash Sutar for plaintiff on documents at Exh.10.
The document at Sr. No.1 is the death certificate. It is directly goes in evidence. TOR and marked as Exh.
The documents at Sr. No.2 to 4 are copies of the Complaints and NC lodged by mother of plaintiff. Those bear stamp of the police station. Those are TOR and marked as Exhibit.
The will at Exh.05 has to be proved by plaintiff as per the provisions of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872.
The documents at Sr. No.6 and 7 are copies of letters and RTI application. Those are referred by the plaintiff in her evidence affidavit. TOR and marked as Exhibit.
Plaintiff is not the author of the document at Sr. No.8. Hence it is not exhibited.
Order below on documents ar Exh.10.
ORDER
01. The document at Sr. No.1 is the death certificate. It is directly goes in evidence. TOR and marked as Exh.11.
02. The document at Sr. No. 2 is the NC and Complaint dt. 05-03-2008 lodged by mother of plaintiff. It bear stamp of the police station. Hence it is marked as Exh.12.
03. The document at Sr. No. 3 is the NCs dt. 05-03-2008 and 04-03-2008 lodged by mother of plaintiff. It bear stamp of the police station. Hence it is collectively marked as Exh.13 colly.
04. The document at Sr. No. 4 is the NC Complaint dt. 11-04-2007 lodged by mother of plaintiff. It bear stamp of the police station. Hence it is marked as Exh.14.
05. The document at Sr. No. 6 is the is copies of letter dt.25-03-2019, 21-06-2019 and 31-07-2019 which are referred by the plaintiff in her evidence affidavit. Hence it is marked as Exh.15 Colly.
06. The document at Sr. No. 7 is the is copy of RTI application. which is referred by the plaintiff in her evidence affidavit. Hence it is marked as Exh.16.
Matter adjourned for cross-examination of PW-1 to 20-01-2025.
Next Purpose: RECORDING EVIDENCE
Next Hearing Date: 20-01-2025
Date: 20-01-2025
Business: IN THE COURT OF H.H.J. R. D. DESHPANDE JUDGE CITY CIVIL COURT C.R. NO. 61
Plaintiff a/w her Adv. Prakash Sutar is present.
Adv. Vaibhav Kamble for defendants No.1, 2 and 4 is present. He seeks time. Other side has no objection.
Matter adjourned for cross-examination of plaintiff as a last chance to 28.02.2025.
Next Purpose: RECORDING EVIDENCE P.H.
Next Hearing Date: 28-02-2025
Date: 28-02-2025
Business: Plaintiff is present.
None for defendant.
K.B.
Later on at 12.02 p.m.
Plaintiff is present.
Adv. Vaibhav Kamble for defendants No.1, 2 and 4 is present.
K.B.
Later on at 12.42 p.m.
Plaintiff is present. She submits that her advocate is held up in another Court. She seeks time.
Adv. Vaibhav Kamble for defendants No.1, 2 and 4 is present.
Matter adjourned for cross-examination of plaintiff to 02.05.2025.
Next Purpose: RECORDING EVIDENCE P.H.
Next Hearing Date: 02-05-2025
Date: 02-05-2025
Business: None for plaintiff.
Adv. Vaibhav Kambale for defendants No.1, 2 and 4 is present.
None for other defendants.
Matter adjourned for cross-examination of plaintiff to 25.06.2025.
Later on at 12.07 p.m.
Plaintiff a/w her Adv. Prakash Sutar is present.
Matter adjourned for cross-examination of plaintiff to 25.06.2025.
Next Purpose: RECORDING EVIDENCE P.H.
Next Hearing Date: 25-06-2025
Date: 25-06-2025
Business: The Court is on leave.
Next Purpose: RECORDING EVIDENCE P.H.
Next Hearing Date: 12-08-2025
Date: 12-08-2025
Business: Plaintiff a/w Adv. Prakash Sutar is present.
Adv. Vaibhav Kamble for defendants No.1, 2 and 4 is present and has requested for adjourned the matter as counsel is unable to attend. O- Granted as last chance with direction that no further time shall granted on any count.
Matter adjourned for cross-examination of PW-01 to 09.09.2025.
Next Purpose: RECORDING EVIDENCE P.H.
Next Hearing Date: 09-09-2025
Date: 09-09-2025
Business: Plaintiff a/w Adv. Prakash Sutar is present.
Adv. Vaibhav Kamble for defendants No.1, 2 and 4 is present and filed adjournment application. TOR. Marked as Exh-17. O- Granted as last chance with directions that no further time is granted at any cost.
Matter adjourned for recording evidence P.H. to 31.10.2025.
Next Purpose: RECORDING EVIDENCE P.H.
Next Hearing Date: 31-10-2025
Date: 31-10-2025
Business: The P.O. is on training.
Next Purpose: RECORDING EVIDENCE P.H.
Next Hearing Date: 18-12-2025
Date: 18-12-2025
Business: IN THE COURT OF H.H.J. A. C. DAGA JUDGE CITY CIVIL COURT C.R. NO. 61
Adv. Prakash Sutar for plaintiff is present.
None for defendant.
K.B.
Later on at 12.44 p.m.
Adv. Prakash Sutar for plaintiff is present.
Adv. Rahul Mahadik for defendant No.1 to 4 is present.
Matter adjourned for cross of PW-01 to 06.02.2026.
Judge
Next Purpose: RECORDING EVIDENCE P.H.
Next Hearing Date: 06-02-2026
Date: 06-02-2026
Business: IN THE COURT OF H.H.J. V. G. RAGHUWANSHI JUDGE CITY CIVIL COURT C.R. NO. 61
Plaintiff is present.
None for defendant.
Matter adjourned for cross of PW-01 to 10.06.2026.
Judge
Next Purpose: RECORDING EVIDENCE P.H.
Next Hearing Date: 10-06-2026
Date: 10-06-2026
Business: IN THE COURT OF H.H.J. SHRI. R. V. BHAKTA JUDGE CITY CIVIL COURT C.R. NO. 61
Plaintiff is present.
Adv. Vaibhav Kamble for defendants No.1, 2 and 4 is present.
Matter adjourned for cross of PW-01 to 07.08.2026.
Judge
Next Purpose: RECORDING EVIDENCE P.H.
Next Hearing Date: 07-08-2026
Date: 07-08-2026
Business: P.O. is on official training.
Next Purpose: RECORDING EVIDENCE P.H.
Next Hearing Date: 07-09-2026
Date: 07-09-2026
Business: CORAM- H.H.J.Ad HOC SHRI. S.K.FOKMARE (CR NO.64).
Matter received from Court No.61.
Adv. Prakash Sutar for plaintiff present.
Adv. Vaibhav Kamble h/f Adv. Rahul Mahdik for defendant
No.1, 2 and 4 present.
Matter is old one. Defendant is not seen interested in Cross-examination of plaintiff. Last adjournment granted.
Matter is adjd. to 09.10.2026 for Cross-examination.
Next Purpose: RECORDING EVIDENCE P.H.
Next Hearing Date: 09-10-2026Additional Case Details
Additional Case Details
Filing Number: 102457/2020 Filing Date: 21-02-2020 First Hearing Date: 23rd November 2020 Court Number And Judge: 64-COURT 64 AD-HOC ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE
Orders
0No order text is available in this record.
TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.
