Date: 15-02-2018
Business: Adv. Sushil Shukla for applicant present.
Applicant to file affidavit of service.
Adjd. to 22/02/2018 for service.
Next Purpose: SERVICE
Next Hearing Date: 22-02-2018
Date: 22-02-2018
Business: Applicant present.
Adv. Harsh Dwivedi for respondent present.
He files reply. Copy supplied to other side.
Adjd. to 14/03/2018 for hearing.
Next Purpose: HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 14-03-2018
Date: 14-03-2018
Business: Applicant present.
None present for respondents.
At the request of applicant, adjd. to 23/03/2018 for hearing.
Next Purpose: HEARING
Next Hearing Date: 23-03-2018
Date: 23-03-2018
Business: Adv. Sushil Shukla for applicant present.
Adv. Divya Shah for respondent present.
Heard both sides.
Adjd. to 03/04/2018 for order.
Next Purpose: ORDER
Next Hearing Date: 03-04-2018
Date: 03-04-2018
Business: Plaintiff in person present.
Adv. Lapasiya for defendants present.
Adjd to 19/04/2018 for R/E (P.H.)
Note - Court is on leave today.
Next Purpose: ORDER
Next Hearing Date: 05-04-2018
Date: 05-04-2018
Business: None present for applicant.
Adv. Sayyed Bukhari for respondent present.
Kept back.
Later on.
Same appearances.
The applicant sought bringing all the six suits in one Court in order to avoid inconsistent findings pertaining to the right, title and interest of the parties with respect to the suit property. I have perused the application, reply and considered the submissions of both the parties.
At the outset, the suit with same subject matter and parties i.e. suit No.2374/11, 55/16 and 342/09 are already in C.R.No.3.
While suit No.66/07 in which the applicant in not the party and therefore no question of transferring the same.
Suit No.1178/08 is filed by the applicant against the MCGM. As the parties and the cause of action is not similar and therefore no question of transferring the same from the Corporation Court.
Nature Of Disposal: ALLOWED
Disposal Date: 05-04-2018
